Re: [techtalk] html editors: Amaya

2000-03-22 Thread dez
> > in my search for The-Perfect-Browser-That-Doesn't-Exist-Yet... > ..Have you tried Opera ??? it is alpha ( maybe even beta by now ) for linux...and although I didnt like the way everything was in one window ( you could often accidentaly close the damn thing in the middle

authentication (Was: Re: [techtalk] html editors)

2000-03-22 Thread Laurel Fan
Excerpts from linuxchix: 22-Mar-100 Re: [techtalk] html editors by Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] > But isn't there a time and place for authentication? > Seems a little OTT for a 'public' mailing list. Why? Authentication is no less important in a public forum. It prevents so

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread dez
Steve quipped:>>> . I REALLY > > > don't like having my attachments folder fill up with Untitled, > > > Untitled 1, Untitled 2, etc. > > > > > ***Funnyon mine all of your messages (jeff) are coming thru as 2 attachments.. no actual message in the main which means I have to open the attachment

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Jeff
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 09:29:36PM +, Steve Howes wrote: > Jeff wrote: > > Um, no. I use it to identify myself in my email. I personally believe > > that we all should be using encryption in email, so we can have some > > form of authentication. You can get PGPi or GPG (which I will be > >

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Steve Howes
Jeff wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 08:38:30AM -0500, Julia Frizzell wrote: > > At 11:44 PM -0800 3/21/00, Jeff wrote: > > >On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 03:27:12PM +0800, dez wrote: > > > > thanx ..jeff..BTW all yours are cpoming thru as an attachment which i > > > > thought was odd... > > >

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Jeff
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 08:38:30AM -0500, Julia Frizzell wrote: > At 11:44 PM -0800 3/21/00, Jeff wrote: > >On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 03:27:12PM +0800, dez wrote: > > > thanx ..jeff..BTW all yours are cpoming thru as an attachment which i > > > thought was odd... > > > >Yeah, mine does that on

Re: [techtalk] html editors: Amaya

2000-03-22 Thread Margaret Leber
Jeff wrote: > Has anyone suggested Amaya yet? Now, admittedly, I haven't used it, but > in my search for The-Perfect-Browser-That-Doesn't-Exist-Yet... I've used Amaya. It's halfway decent, although there are the occasional odd IU idioms you have to use to do what seem like perfectly ordinary th

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if Julia Frizzell > > yes, however, ANY attachment is bad form on a mailing list. I REALLY > don't like having my attachments folder fill up with Untitled, > Untitled 1, Untitled 2, etc. Um, then get a less brain-dead mail client. Rik ___ techtal

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if dez > thanx ..jeff..BTW all yours are cpoming thru as an attachment which i > thought was odd... Well to be picky, the first text part of Jeff's messages should have 'Content-Disposition: inline' in the envelope, to tell the MUA that this part should be viewed automatically. In practice,

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Rik Hemsley
#if dez > Can anyone suggest a great ( note not good but great *grin*) > html editor..for those with win experiance I'd like something akin to > hotdog pro.. I suggest doing layout by hand, to ensure correct rendering in graphical, text and speech browsers. I also suggest using style sheets for

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Julia Frizzell
At 11:44 PM -0800 3/21/00, Jeff wrote: >On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 03:27:12PM +0800, dez wrote: > > thanx ..jeff..BTW all yours are cpoming thru as an attachment which i > > thought was odd... > >Yeah, mine does that on purpose, except it isn't html; it is a PGP >signature. yes, however, ANY at

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Caitlyn M. Martin
dez wrote: > So I take it that you have no suggestions of a similar HTML editor for linux > like Hotdog ??? > Hi, Well... I've never used Hotdog, so I can't compare, but I've found three I can use and like reasonably well. The simplest, and IMHO, the best, especially if you basically do raw co

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Telsa Gwynne
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 03:02:27AM -0500 or thereabouts, Laurel Fan wrote: > > Emacs psgml mode is great! Commands to insert an element and the > required sub-elements, complete a tag name, automatically insert > the correct end tag, insert an attribute, etc. I use it to do DocBook, > and have

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Tami Friedman
s the correct end tag, insert an attribute, etc. I use it to do DocBook, ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Eito Katagiri
Hi dez, [Also, hi to everybody since this is my first post.] Have you tried Bluefish? If not, check out: http://bluefish.linuxbox.com/ (You need Gtk+ library and Imlib. I assume that you are using GNOME on Linux, so you should be able to install binary package and run it.) :eito On Wed,

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread dez
Thanx.. I didnt know they made one!!! ill check it out ( tho..i must admit I did try it a long time ago for windows and wasnt to impressed BUT that was then and this is NOW !!) cheerz dez > Coffeecup for Linux (www.coffeecup.com) is pretty good, and doesn't add > excessive code that isn't needed

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-22 Thread Laurel Fan
Excerpts from linuxchix: 22-Mar-100 Re: [techtalk] html editors by Mari [EMAIL PROTECTED] > No, sorry... Writing HTML from scratch using emacs has filled all my > needs so far :-) Emacs psgml mode is great! Commands to insert an element and the required sub-elements, complete a ta

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-21 Thread Jeff
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 03:27:12PM +0800, dez wrote: > thanx ..jeff..BTW all yours are cpoming thru as an attachment which i > thought was odd... Yeah, mine does that on purpose, except it isn't html; it is a PGP signature. > i guess ive been spoilt being able to code/design and make graphi

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-21 Thread Shaun
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 03:27:12PM +0800, dez wrote: > im not into wsiwyg coz a lot of code gets stuffed up...but ill have a look > at it... remember that amaya is written by w3c, it is unlikely to produce crap code shaun ___ techtalk mailing list [

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-21 Thread dez
gt; To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 3:09 PM Subject: Re: [techtalk] html editors ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-21 Thread Jeff
On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 03:02:56PM +0800, dez wrote: > sorry . > iIdidnt know i was...it should all be plain text..I just checked > the settings of this confounded outlook express and it is set to plain text > so I dont know how it is being sent in html. It sent the html as an

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-21 Thread Mari Wang
> I just checked the settings of this confounded outlook express and it > is set to plain text so I dont know how it is being sent in html. Use emacs for email? Anyway, it seems outlook is happily sending plain text now :) > BUT Let's face itNotepad does not always cut the mustard... Umm

Re: [techtalk] html editors

2000-03-21 Thread dez
dez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 2:40 PM Subject: Re: [techtalk] html editors > > Hello from a fellow plug'er in Perth... :) > > Could you please refrain from posting HTML to mailing lists? :-) > > Mari, who writes her HTML code fro scratch :) &

[techtalk] html editors

2000-03-21 Thread dez
hiyas peoples   Can anyone suggest a great ( note not good but great *grin*) html editor..for those with win experiance I'd like something akin to hotdog pro.. ive been looking at tucows and a few other places but i dont seem to be able to get anything beyond gnotepad etc ( which is good but