I don't know what your problem was, but when I installed linux on my machine
(with win95/NT on it) the swap partition shifted the partition numbers and I
got something like that : "Windows NT could not start because the following
file is missing or corrupt: \system32\ntoskrnl.exe Please
reinstall
What was the problem with NT partition?
It holds a Microsoft product...and only a Microsoft product...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
[EMAIL
When I tried to get back into NT, it gave me an error msg, something about the
paritition information. I don't remember exactly what it was now...
I tried to recover, while maintaining my linux stuff, but I ended up having to
do a reinstall OVER the existing NT and that's work, and since i wou
Title: RE: [techtalk] dual boot NT/linux
>I haven't found a reliable way of getting NT to boot using
>lilo without bootpart (keeping in mind that I only have one
>hard drive to work with, so they are sharing, and a number
>of my installs have been NT/Linux/Win...
> then added linux...it screwed up my NT partitions EVERYTIME...and believe
What was the problem with NT partition?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
then perhaps i only thought about it, and never actually did it..
and btw...you're taking away my memory excuse!! i never had a good one
until i hit 30
kristin
> I haven't found a reliable way of getting NT to boot using lilo without
> bootpart (keeping in mind that I only have one hard dr
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Kristin Ziel wrote:
> hm...i think this may have been my problem...i did read a lot of articles
> that mentioned using it, but i ended up trying something without..
>
> or, perhaps i misstated in my earlier (just mailed) mail that i thot about
> using lilo instead of NT's loa
hm...i think this may have been my problem...i did read a lot of articles
that mentioned using it, but i ended up trying something without..
or, perhaps i misstated in my earlier (just mailed) mail that i thot about
using lilo instead of NT's loader, but never actually did...
ARG!! i turn 30 an
Well...yes and no. initially, no. i'd tried to use NT's loader like i
had previously done during the 95/NT/linux phase. but that *repeatedly*
didn't work..and I tried various things, like having a data partition in
there,so that it wouldn't be directly "next to" the OS partition.
Since that n
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Kristin Ziel wrote:
> When I decided to clean some house and get rid of 95, and go with NT, and
> then added linux...it screwed up my NT partitions EVERYTIME...and believe
> me..I was not a happy woman at this point. This turned out well, as it
> was my final straw with windo
Were you using a boot loader from the distro? (lilo, etc)?
Kristin Ziel wrote:
> Hi all--
>
> question about the NT/Linux dual boot...at one point, I had 95, NT and
> linux installed, and booting just fine from one harddrive. They were
> installed in that order also.
>
> When I decided to cle
Hi, Kristen,
> When I decided to clean some house and get rid of 95, and go with NT, and
> then added linux...it screwed up my NT partitions EVERYTIME...and believe
> me..I was not a happy woman at this point.
>
> I have heard that it doesn't work but is there a technical explanation
> that I co
Hi all--
question about the NT/Linux dual boot...at one point, I had 95, NT and
linux installed, and booting just fine from one harddrive. They were
installed in that order also.
When I decided to clean some house and get rid of 95, and go with NT, and
then added linux...it screwed up my NT pa
13 matches
Mail list logo
