From: Conor Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 10:38:20PM -0500 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
> Julie thought:
> > Not to be the mistress of understatement, but I found a big
> > difference between double-digit nets (16Mb token ring) and
> > triple digit nets (220Mb glass).
> >
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 10:38:20PM -0500 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Julie thought:
> From: Mary Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 08:49:20PM +0100, Conor Daly wrote:
> > > Interesting something comes to mind there... What will it cost me to
> put
> > > /home on an NF
From: Mary Gardiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 08:49:20PM +0100, Conor Daly wrote:
> > Interesting something comes to mind there... What will it cost me to
put
> > /home on an NFS volume over a 4-box 10Mbit network? It's gotta be
slower
> > than local disk but you get to carry
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 08:49:20PM +0100, Conor Daly wrote:
> Interesting something comes to mind there... What will it cost me to put
> /home on an NFS volume over a 4-box 10Mbit network? It's gotta be slower
> than local disk but you get to carry your settings across boxes. Not that
> anyone
Well, I think this used to be the case. I remember having problems with
RAID on older (6.0 maybe?) RHL installs because of this problem. Bear in
mind, your fstab file USED to read something like
/var/dev/hda5
So if hda or hdb switch around, that fstab won't work. However,
On Sat, 19 May 2001, Conor Daly wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 01:04:09AM +1000 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
> Mary Gardiner thought:
> > On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 09:00:13AM -0400, coldfire wrote:
> > > > I tend to go for spreading both OSs out over both drives. It's supposed
> > > > to be a
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 01:04:09AM +1000 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Mary Gardiner thought:
> On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 09:00:13AM -0400, coldfire wrote:
> > > I tend to go for spreading both OSs out over both drives. It's supposed
> > > to be a performance thing where /usr is on one disk whi
At 5/19/01 06:00 AM , coldfire wrote:
> > I tend to go for spreading both OSs out over both drives. It's supposed
> > to be a performance thing where /usr is on one disk while /home is on
> > another and similarly for Windows. I don't know how much gain I get on a
> > home box (probably not much
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 09:00:13AM -0400, coldfire wrote:
> > I tend to go for spreading both OSs out over both drives. It's supposed
> > to be a performance thing where /usr is on one disk while /home is on
> > another and similarly for Windows. I don't know how much gain I get on a
> > home bo
> I tend to go for spreading both OSs out over both drives. It's supposed
> to be a performance thing where /usr is on one disk while /home is on
> another and similarly for Windows. I don't know how much gain I get on a
> home box (probably not much) but I did it anyhow...
never knew it was a
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 09:44:03PM -0500 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
Julie thought:
> From: Wendy Galovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Hi Keith,
> > If you have only one IDE connection to use, but want to have the
> > two OSes installed on separate drives, you could try this: get one
> > swappab
On Fri, May 18, 2001 at 04:51:13PM -0400 or so it is rumoured hereabouts,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] thought:
>
> I have been cautioned to back up all of my data just in case, but why
> could I not unplug the IDE cable to the Win98 HD and do the install on
> the Linux HD? Would I be opening a can of wor
Hi, Keith,
> Working on the basis that there really aren't any stupid questions, here
> I go again...
I don't agree that there are no stupid questions. Still... I don't see you
asking any :)
>
> From the earlier queries on installing my copy of Caldera Open Linux
> eDesktop 2.4, putting the wh
From: Wendy Galovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi Keith,
> If you have only one IDE connection to use, but want to have the
> two OSes installed on separate drives, you could try this: get one
> swappable drive rack and two trays to mount the hard drives in. Then you
> can swap them as often as you ne
> LILO needs to write to the MBR of the first drive. Bad thing to confuse it
> by swapping one drive in and out, IMO at least (I don't have first hand
> experience with it, just making a guess).
LILO doesn't have to be installed to the MBR .. as a matter of fact, this
is the less recommended ins
On Fri, 18 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 16:51:13 -0400
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [techtalk] Yet Another Installation Question
>
> Hi again, Keith here in the Depths of the Great Bergen Swamp
>
> Working on the
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 4:51 PM
Subject: [techtalk] Yet Another Installation Question
> Hi again, Keith here in the Depths of the Great Bergen Swamp
>
> Working on the basis that there really aren't any stupid questions, here
> I go again...
>
> >From the earlier qu
Hi again, Keith here in the Depths of the Great Bergen Swamp
Working on the basis that there really aren't any stupid questions, here
I go again...
>From the earlier queries on installing my copy of Caldera Open Linux
eDesktop 2.4, putting the whole package on a separate drive seems the way
to g
18 matches
Mail list logo
