Thanks Telsa and Caitlyn! I hope that
wasn't too obvious a question, because
I spent over an hour perusing redhat's site
and rpm.org attempting to find the answer,
but they didn't seem to be mentioned, but
that could just mean my search skills are
worthless... hrrm..
:-)
Thanks again,
Walt
-~
Walt wrote:
>
> I'm having some difficulty when attempting
> to install the (I think) latest glibc rpm from
> RedHat's site. It says:
>
> only packages with major numbers <= 3 are supported by this version of RPM
> error: glibc-2.1.92-14.i686.rpm cannot be installed
>
Hi, Walt,
Newer RPMs from
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 12:46:01PM -0400 or thereabouts, Walt wrote:
> I'm having some difficulty when attempting
> to install the (I think) latest glibc rpm from
> RedHat's site. It says:
>
> only packages with major numbers <= 3 are supported by this version of RPM
> error: glibc-2.1.92-14.i686
I'm having some difficulty when attempting
to install the (I think) latest glibc rpm from
RedHat's site. It says:
only packages with major numbers <= 3 are supported by this version of RPM
error: glibc-2.1.92-14.i686.rpm cannot be installed
Any suggestions? I've tried updating RPM to
rpm-3.0.4-0
On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 06:35:27PM -0400, Angela Nash wrote:
> Been there. Done that. :)
>
> Just go get v3 and do a forced downgrade. Your database should come back
> fine...mine did.
To solve the version number problem, got to www.rpm.org and then from the
snapshot page, download the version
Been there. Done that. :)
Just go get v3 and do a forced downgrade. Your database should come back
fine...mine did.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Samantha Atkins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 11:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [techtalk] rpm hell
PROTECTED]
Subject: [techtalk] rpm hell
I think I just did a very stupid thing or at least tripped over a
landmine in Linux. I ran into a rpm package (emacs-20.7...) that would
not install with my standard rpm v3.0.4. It complained that it could
not handle major versions greater than 3 so I assumed
I think I just did a very stupid thing or at least tripped over a
landmine in Linux. I ran into a rpm package (emacs-20.7...) that would
not install with my standard rpm v3.0.4. It complained that it could
not handle major versions greater than 3 so I assumed the message was
about rpm and the ve
What program are you trying to install?
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Lilly S. wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I downloaded a package, and I think i didn't uninstall it properly. I want
> to reinstall it now, but for some reason whenever I try to use rpm, I'm
> told that the package is installed. But when I do
On Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 08:22:54PM -0400, Lilly S. wrote:
> I downloaded a package, and I think i didn't uninstall it properly. I want
> to reinstall it now, but for some reason whenever I try to use rpm, I'm
> told that the package is installed. But when I do a rpm -q, it says it's
> not installe
Hello all,
I downloaded a package, and I think i didn't uninstall it properly. I want
to reinstall it now, but for some reason whenever I try to use rpm, I'm
told that the package is installed. But when I do a rpm -q, it says it's
not installed.
huh? I'm confused.
Can someone shed some light o
11 matches
Mail list logo
