From: BiOFH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hehehe ...to avoid those uncomfortable moments months later when they
> say "OK, now we want to add X and put this baby live on the
> Internet"? And the programmers reply "Uhh... couldn't you have told
> us this 'before' we did it all with UDP instead of TCP"?
re all pretty amazed that an old-timer would adopt XP so vigorously).
Anyway, just a few thoughts.
Jen
- Original Message -
From: "BiOFH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2001 8:53 PM
Subject: [techtalk] More XP vs UML
___
techtalk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk
Many thanks to all the valuable postings regarding this topic. It's interesting to
hear the other war stories and approaches.
I think I just have to take a more involved approach with the team members, get
everyone deep into it at all levels. This really *isn't* a hierarchy here, I think
it
Hehehe ...to avoid those uncomfortable moments months later when they
say "OK, now we want to add X and put this baby live on the
Internet"? And the programmers reply "Uhh... couldn't you have told
us this 'before' we did it all with UDP instead of TCP"?
;)
maggie
>Jenn V said:
>Then TALK WITH
Shari wrote:
> I have to say, the team aspect of development/programming is what I
like best about it.
> That's what is the most appealing aspect of XP to me. Stronger
involvement with all members.
> With UML, here anyway, it seems to happen like this:
That sounds like a formal nigh
