Samantha Atkins wrote:
> Kelly Lynn Martin wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 21 Feb 2000 16:58:14 +1100, "Jenn V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >
> > >Correct me if I'm wrong, but 'you don't know of any Lisp
> > >documentation besides what's in the Emacs distribution'? Are those
> > >the missing adjectives
Kelly Lynn Martin wrote:
>
> On Mon, 21 Feb 2000 16:58:14 +1100, "Jenn V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >Correct me if I'm wrong, but 'you don't know of any Lisp
> >documentation besides what's in the Emacs distribution'? Are those
> >the missing adjectives?
>
> There are _lots_ of good books
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000 16:58:14 +1100, "Jenn V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Correct me if I'm wrong, but 'you don't know of any Lisp
>documentation besides what's in the Emacs distribution'? Are those
>the missing adjectives?
There are _lots_ of good books on LISP out there. The Little LISPer
is a
"Jenn V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but 'you don't know of any Lisp documentation
> besides what's in the Emacs distribution'? Are those the missing
> adjectives?
We were talking about the VM mail client specifically. That's the
distribution I was referring to. I k
Robert Kiesling wrote:
> It's not one of my favorite languages either. I'm afraid I don't know
> of any documentation besides what's in the distribution. I guess the
> usual advice from the Emacs gurus would be "use the source."
Correct me if I'm wrong, but 'you don't know of any Lisp docume
