[techtalk] Re: [grrltalk] I am a lucky man!

2001-06-13 Thread sara ruohotie
> I'M ENGAGED congrats, it's a big thing =) > Which brings me to the next thing...if anyone's got advice on planning a > wedding real quick-like, please let me know. Neither of us is too you've got a couple of months still time, which about the same amount we had. first of all, there's

Re: [techtalk] uptimes ... ;)

2001-05-28 Thread sara ruohotie
> actually, nowadays SUNs are bootable without loosing uptime. it's > really weird, but i guess that's a nice feature, but it requires some > kind of magic before booting. err, something made me hit 'send' before finishing the email. in our tech-section we have this joke about booting suns w

Re: [techtalk] uptimes ... ;)

2001-05-28 Thread sara ruohotie
> To answer your question. > There is no way to upgrade a kernel without rebooting the machine. actually, nowadays SUNs are bootable without loosing uptime. it's really weird, but i guess that's a nice feature, but it requires some kind of magic before booting. sara

Re: [techtalk] Oddness

2001-03-25 Thread sara ruohotie
> It's so nice to have sysadmin friends. It's like having a doctor in > the family. not to mention having sysadmin husband! the best part about it is that when i really need help, i can whine about it, and even tho if he wouldn't want to bother himiself on thinking about the subject right no

Re: [techtalk] mutt again

2000-12-04 Thread sara ruohotie
> Don't know if it's the Right and Proper way, but I have 'set > record="=sent-mail-`date +%Y-%m`"' and it works very well :) thanks magni, saved me again =) sara ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/te

[techtalk] mutt again

2000-12-04 Thread sara ruohotie
anyone know the Right and Proper way of saving all sent mail into one folder, f.ex. sent-mail in mutt? sara ___ techtalk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/techtalk

Re: [techtalk] OpenBSD vs. Debian 2.2

2000-11-02 Thread sara ruohotie
> "Yes, OpenBSD will run on your multiprocessor machine, but it will only > use one processor. There currently is no support for SMP". just to let you know: freebsd utilizes multiprocessors very fluently. i don't have one, but my husband has and he says he's been very satisfied and pleased on

[techtalk] Re: [grrltalk] girly t-shirts

2000-10-24 Thread sara ruohotie
> and whatnot printed on them. did anythinghappen with that?? i'm really > interested in getting some shirts like that if they are available...let me afaik nothing has happened, but i was just wondering whether there is a shop, where one can go and buy geek-stuff. a shop in nyc or boston or

Re: [techtalk] Re: mutt?

2000-10-16 Thread sara ruohotie
> # set markers=yes > # > # Name: markers > # Type: boolean > # Default: yes ok, no recompiling, this did the trick: set markers=no set smart_wrap=yes (hmm, this is obsolete actually, it's this way by default) it wasn't that hard at all. just took the moment to through th

Re: [techtalk] Re: mutt?

2000-10-16 Thread sara ruohotie
> # Controls the display of wrapped lines in the internal pager. If set, a > # `+'' marker is displayed at the beginning of wrapped lines. Also see > # the `smart_wrap'' variable. uhgrr. why isn't this made easy like in irc-script? set continued_line=+ or something and then you can change it to

Re: [techtalk] Re: mutt?

2000-10-16 Thread sara ruohotie
> Congrats on changing :) Once you get the hang of Mutt I'm sure > you'll like it better. yeah, well, i've liked it very much, the only problem with me is that i'm the kind of person, who likes something and never wants to try something new and if still tries, there's always 'something wrong'

[techtalk] mutt?

2000-10-15 Thread sara ruohotie
okay, so i was brave enough to change from the old, comfy, easy pine, which i knew like my own pockets into scary, strange, weird mutt (but they say it's better!). so, is anyone like real familiar with mutt? my problem is that i'm using mutt on several machines and on my own puter (freebsd 4

Re: [techtalk] Distribution problems

2000-10-10 Thread sara ruohotie
> FreeBSD > > Can anyone here recommend a good distribution which will allow me to get a agreed. i'm using freebsd at the moment as a mailserver and yeah, it was pretty simple and absolutely totally functional. no recompiling either os or kernel. sara

Re: [techtalk] UNIX Autoresponder and email aliasing help needed

2000-10-09 Thread sara ruohotie
hi, > I want to set up email autoresponses for email on a SunOS 4.x box. I would i'm not very sure about this, but you'll have to get some program fex vacation, activate it and make a file called .vacation (or something) where you write your autoresponse. but i think that you can't exclude m

Re: [techtalk] Multiple virtual host question/Apache

2000-10-06 Thread sara ruohotie
> Is there a reasonable limit to the amount of virtual hosts one should > run on a server? For example, we're up to 5 virtual hosts on one web well, we use apache on our isp's server and provide virtual hosting for our clients and yes, there are quite an amount of virtual hosts running at the

Re: [techtalk] Linux and UNIX

2000-10-06 Thread sara ruohotie
> Is Linux close enough to UNIX that I could ask some UNIX questions? imho it is. but you have to remember, that linux *isn't* unix, it's minix actually, it doesn't go with the unix standards. and depending on the question you have, you might even get an answer which is correct :> > Thanks,

Re: [techtalk] Firewalls

2000-09-25 Thread sara ruohotie
> Hi, > I am looking a bit at firewalls today. I am trying to find a firewall > product) that > - is easy to set up > - requires very little maintenance > - has filters/interpretors to detect attacks easily and reliable > - has some automatic update procedures [for software on the box, not > fw-r

Re: [techtalk] *nix comparisons?

2000-08-15 Thread sara ruohotie
> > comfortable in either environment, but Linux *is* a bit more user friendly > > and easier to teach, and I think, as a result, it has a better future. > offered for FreeBSD. Personally, I don't feel that Linux will have a > 'better' future, however, I do think that both Linux and FreeBSD will

Re: [techtalk] *nix comparisons?

2000-08-07 Thread sara ruohotie
hmm, first of all, i'm sorry to flood the lists, but i just came back from the states, i was spending my honeymoon there and i was very much apart from any internet access. so i'm reading these ~600 now and answering a bit late to those i feel i have something to say to. and about the subject.

Re: [techtalk] Netscape

2000-06-26 Thread sara ruohotie
On Mon, 26 Jun 2000, Carolyn Jarie Getter wrote: > In Netscape, when I go to certain pages, it (Netscape) goes *poof* (shuts > down). I don't begin to know where to look to figure out why. All my my netscape does that when i go to heavily javaed paged (gosh my english sucks!). i mean many ja