On Mon, 21 Feb 2000 15:39:58 -0800 (PST)
Raven Damask <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The O'Reilly intro series are too basic (I was
> pretty disappointed in their book on learning Debian,
> which is a first for me and O'Reilly), and "Running
> Linux" is too in-depth for this class, and presumes
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000 06:29:40 +1100
"Jenn V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> J B wrote:
> >
> > If you are going to buy a new monitor, go ahead and shell out the small
> > extra amount to go up to a 21"...you can find good ones at good
> > prices...look through the archives, we had a discussion on p
On Sat, 08 Jan 2000 18:52:29 +1100
"Jenn V." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Laurel Fan wrote:
> >
>
> > If the asker does know how to do all of this, and is insulted, I'm
> > sorry, but I'm glad you're insulted because you just wasted my time.
>
> Actually, you didn't waste your time - I d
On Sun, 2 Jan 2000 17:12:06 -0600
Aaron Malone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 02, 2000 at 11:10:53AM -0500, Jeff Dike wrote:
> > > Because I screwed up my linux install, and had to start over yesterday
> > > :-)
> >
> > BTW, what did you do? I'm having trouble thinking of anything s
Well, as usual, I've got problems. Machine B (the no modem, not working
ethernet, Mandrake 6.1 running, S3 ViRGE and Cyrix based system) is
pulling more stupid X tricks. Remember how it stopped letting my
personal account access the CDROM drive? Well, it also gradually cut off
my access to WindowM
Remember my machine A and machine B problems of a couple weeks ago? I've
got more *g*. Lots more. I'm sleepy, and there are a lot of problems so
if something seems confused, ask. If nothing else, looking at the
problems again with an eye to providing useful details would help me
learn what to look
On Thu, 16 Dec 1999 18:12:44 +
Telsa Gwynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you know that you can IRC (ircii) and browse the web (lynx) over
> a 9600 baud link with 55% packet loss? :) Email would come through,
> too, but we used to use UUCP for some other stuff and for a small
> local news
DVD video support is in the 2.3 kernels. See http://www.linux.org.uk/diary/
or http://roadrunner.swansea.linux.org.uk/~hobbit/diary.html for first
hand details . If you want stable support, wait for the
2.4 kernels. Since I am a broke college student, the whole point is moot
for me...
Emily, whos
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999 13:20:09 -0500 (EST)
Laurel Fan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks like you want to show the updates to both Linux machines, correct?
Ideally yes, cause XFree86 is rather out of date with respect to at
least one of the video cards, and probably both. And Machine B is the
one
Ok, this is a case of "I know what I want to do, so what is the best way
to do it?". I'm up to two machines that run linux at least some of the
time. Neither can do 'net access under Linux at the moment, but one can
do it under Win95. I have a nice long list of things that need to be
updated, and
On Mon, 29 Nov 1999 17:57:41 -0600
"Conrad Golightly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> real world. Also, please do not forget that this is a Linux list. If this
> were a Windows NT/98/95 list, HTML email might very well be acceptable.
Actually... Most mailing list servers I know of barf when handed
Here's some nice hard data on the other big error.
If the install manages to get to the point where you select the type of
system and the packages you want, a nice little error comes up. Error
cannot unpack base system archive. If I head over to the virtual console
with the error log, it indicat
I have a nice little TurboLinux 4.0 CD, so I'm attempting to put it on
my machine. I'm using a floppy with the boot image and the extra
hardware floppy, as my machine refuses to boot from CD-ROM.
My system is a Cyrix-233 with 64 MB of RAM, a 1 gig hard drive, a
Hitachi CDR-7730 CD-ROM drive, a So
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999 10:53:33 -0400 (EDT)
"Jennifer M. Woodard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there called glare screens. A good one runs about 60 bucks. One of my best
> investments, Its really good for those that work in cubicle hell and have
> to deal with florecents. (however thats spelled) M
At 04:36 PM 10/15/99 +0100, you wrote:
>I actually proof-read this before sending. Now I get it back I
>see this:
>> Netscape's code for Navigator and Communicator was proprietary.
>> In 1988 they made lots of the code for Navigator 4.0 openly available.
>
>That would be 1998, of course, since t
15 matches
Mail list logo
