someone from the technical board please action on the results of
the elections?
Deactivate:
- Dimitri John Ledkov ~xnox
- Iain Lane ~laney
- Stéphane Graber ~stgraber
Extend expiration by two years for:
- Brian Murray ~brian-murray
- Micah Gersten ~micahg
Add with a two year expiration:
- Robie
Hello,
I would like to self-nominate for the Technical Board.
--
Regards,
Dimitri.
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
As part of the collaboration between Canonical and OEMs public OEM
archives exist that ship additional open-source patches, fixes and
hardware-specific documentation. These archives are used by default on
the Ubuntu pre-installed SKUs as sold by OEMs. The updates in those
repositories are sensitive
I have added this to the next Techboard Meeting on the 8th of October
20:00 London time.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TechnicalBoardAgenda
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 at 15:23, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>
> As part of the collaboration between Canonical and OEMs public OEM
> archives exist
We have had IRC meeting, and then a few private meetings since then.
The current focus is on 20.04 LTS release only.
The current focus is to enable out of the box OEM Certified experience
using the default Ubuntu Desktop installation media.
Allow a secure opt-in upgrade path from vanilla Ubuntu to
I would like to request the following updates to the UbuntuSeededSnaps
Policy https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuSeededSnaps
7. Bases
Seeded snaps which use a base, must use "base: core18" or higher.
Existing snaps are grandfathered, but are encouraged to update to
"base: core18" or higher.
8. Contact
Currently https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuSeededSnaps does not specify
anything about tracks.
Currently the status quo is to seed the default-track of the snap, aka "latest".
Recently we have been approached by LXD upstream to use a different
"LTS" track of the seeded lxd snap which has longer supp
Hi ~ubuntu-archive admins & techboard,
I would like to apply for ~ubuntu-archive team membership. Initially
scoped to exclusively working on & reviewing existing kernel related
packages. Many tasks to publish regular kernel updates require
privileges above of ~ubuntu-core-dev since binary packages
, modulo the
> separate discussion point Seb brings up.]
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 04:29:14PM +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > Hi ~ubuntu-archive admins & techboard,
>
> > I would like to apply for ~ubuntu-archive team membership. Initially
> > scoped to exclusively
Hi all,
Are expiry dates listed on
https://launchpad.net/~developer-membership-board/+members correct?
And does it mean that even without expiry of any current members
through inactivity, we will be having a full election of all DMB
members in May?
If that is the case, is there any need to run an
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 4:19 PM Dimitri John Ledkov
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 8:29 PM Steve Langasek
> wrote:
> >
> > [The ordinary membership of the ubuntu-archive team is handled internally by
> > the archive team, and directly by the lau
Hi,
Can techboard please action the following request for Noble distro series
https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/709163 ?
It is acked by the apt repository format maintainer.
--
Dimitri
Sent from Ubuntu Pro
https://ubuntu.com/pro
--
technical-board mailing list
technical-board@
Hi,
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 at 15:22, Robie Basak wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 09:56:05AM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > Can techboard please action the following request for Noble distro series
> > https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/709163 ?
> >
&g
Dear Technical Board members,
During the last meeting, Developer Membership Board has agreed to
create a new packageset "Packages providing the virtualisation
technologies Xen, QEMU and libvirt."
Please create new packageset "virt" (or some other appropriate name)
with owner set to ~developer-me
On 27 November 2014 at 09:01, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
> On 27/11/14 00:05, Kees Cook wrote:
>>
>> I think we should have the same policy for PPAs, and it should follow the
>> same timeline. Additionally, we should have LP reject uploading weak keys,
>> which could happens early in the transition
On 28 November 2014 at 11:54, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Dimitri John Ledkov [2014-11-28 10:45 +]:
>> My concern with ECC algorithms is smaller key sizes to match
>> equivalent RSA security (e.g. 224 bit ECC key ~= 2048 bit RSA key).
>> Which leads to requiring less quantum com
Subject: Re: Please retire extras.ubuntu.com
To: Dimitri John Ledkov
Cc: Ubuntu Developers
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 06:26:54PM +, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> At the moment do-release-upgrade -d from utopic -> vivid is failing
> because extras.ubuntu.com repository does not exist for vi
Hello Till,
I believe a long time ago techboard has delegate upload rights
management to the Developer Membership Board.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard
As such, I believe your request below should be addressed to the devel
permissions mailing list, rather than tech board, for a
In the past said nomenclature had some external meanings w.r.t. split
mirroring, native builders, commercial support.
However over the years all of these things have been externalised - split
mirroring is defined elsewhere; builder technology has moved to fully
private cloud; and commercial suppor
19 matches
Mail list logo
