On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 06:58:35PM +0200, Jaromír Dole?ek wrote:
> Perhaps it would make sense to commit the unfinished work anyway, in
> case somebody else wants to pick it up? It will be a while before I'd
> be able to get back to it.
Yes, please!
Martin
2018-05-11 18:41 GMT+02:00 Martin Husemann :
> Having ENA would still be good, as it should perform much better.
> Given that it is split in two parts and the "common" ones should
> only need cosmetical changes (like include paths and a few ifdefs
> for NetBSD), the main work should not be that bad
On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 06:29:32PM +0200, Jaromír Dole?ek wrote:
> ENA is the new virtual networking interface. There is a FreeBSD port
> of the Linux driver for this. I've had a stab to port it over. It's
> not very easy since the kernel networking interfaces differ quite a
> lot between FreeBSD a
Following up on slightly older thread ...
> On Nov 8, 10:15pm, ka...@el.net (el kalin) wrote:
>> So some things are in flux:
>>
>> https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/11/09/aws_deletes_new_hypervisor_kvm/
>>
>> It seems that NetBSD does not boot anymore because the XEN configuration
>> at AWS to no
