2018-05-11 18:41 GMT+02:00 Martin Husemann <mar...@duskware.de>: > Having ENA would still be good, as it should perform much better. > Given that it is split in two parts and the "common" ones should > only need cosmetical changes (like include paths and a few ifdefs > for NetBSD), the main work should not be that bad.
Indeed - I've actually got the common part to compile, using just tweaks in ena_plat.h. I've got some way through ena.c (to actual ifp/if_*() code) before I suspended the efford. Perhaps it would make sense to commit the unfinished work anyway, in case somebody else wants to pick it up? It will be a while before I'd be able to get back to it. Jaromir
