On Sat, 11 Jun 2016, Paul Goyette wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016, Robert Elz wrote:
...
If you were also to add
{ "-newerat", N_ASINCE, c_asince, 1 }, /* gnu find
compat */
{ "-newerct", N_CSINCE, c_csince, 1 },
{ "-newermt", N_SINCE,c_since,1 },
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:18:16 +0800 (PHT)
Paul Goyette wrote:
> I'd like to suggest adding new primitives
>
> -asince "timestamp"
> -csince "timestamp"
I'd just like to suggest that, instead of adding new primitives, allow
the existing primitives to take a parsable string. Rules:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016, Robert Elz wrote:
You added -since but documented -msince in the man page.
I think I just fixed that in my local copy. wiz@ pointed it out.
If you were also to add
{ "-newerat", N_ASINCE, c_asince, 1 },/* gnu
find compat */
{ "-
You added -since but documented -msince in the man page.
If you were also to add
{ "-newerat", N_ASINCE, c_asince, 1 },/* gnu find
compat */
{ "-newerct", N_CSINCE, c_csince, 1 },
{ "-newermt", N_SINCE, c_since,1 },/* ung */
in the ap
Anyway, I don't really care one way or the other. I'll make my changes
locally, and I'll get what I want. If others want to use findutils, they
know where to get it; if others want my changes, ask for them.
I just won't commit them without some sort of indication of consent. (Just
like my c
Date:Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:03:35 +0800 (PHT)
From:Paul Goyette
Message-ID:
| Does anyone have suggestions and web-sites for a couple of linux
| distros? I'm not going to check them all... :)
I'd assume they all use the find that's in the gnu findutils which is
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:03:35 +0800 (PHT)
From:Paul Goyette
Message-ID:
| Does anyone have suggestions and web-sites for a couple of linux
| distros? I'm not going to check them all... :)
I'd assume they all use the find t
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:06:42 +0800 (PHT)
From:Paul Goyette
Message-ID:
| > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 02:18:16PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
| >> I'd like to suggest adding new primitives
| >>
| >> -asince "timestamp"
| >
Date:Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:06:42 +0800 (PHT)
From:Paul Goyette
Message-ID:
| > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 02:18:16PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
| >> I'd like to suggest adding new primitives
| >>
| >> -asince "timestamp"
| >> -csince "timestamp"
| I'll get
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Roy Marples wrote:
On 10/06/2016 10:03, Paul Goyette wrote:
Does anyone have suggestions and web-sites for a couple of linux
distros? I'm not going to check them all... :)
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/find.1.html
Quite a few time related options.
Yup - includ
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Simon Burge wrote:
Paul Goyette wrote:
I often find myself (no pun intended!) wanting to determine which files
were accessed before/since a particular timestamp. There currently
exist the -{a,c}{newer,min,time} primitives, but none of these allow me
to say "since today at
Paul Goyette wrote:
> I often find myself (no pun intended!) wanting to determine which files
> were accessed before/since a particular timestamp. There currently
> exist the -{a,c}{newer,min,time} primitives, but none of these allow me
> to say "since today at 5 AM".
>
> I'd like to suggest
On 10/06/2016 10:03, Paul Goyette wrote:
> Does anyone have suggestions and web-sites for a couple of linux
> distros? I'm not going to check them all... :)
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/find.1.html
Quite a few time related options.
Roy
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Thomas Klausner wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 02:18:16PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
I often find myself (no pun intended!) wanting to determine which files were
accessed before/since a particular timestamp. There currently exist the
-{a,c}{newer,min,time} primitives, but
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 02:18:16PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
> I often find myself (no pun intended!) wanting to determine which files were
> accessed before/since a particular timestamp. There currently exist the
> -{a,c}{newer,min,time} primitives, but none of these allow me to say "since
> tod
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 02:18:16PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
I'd like to suggest adding new primitives
-asince "timestamp"
-csince "timestamp"
where the timestamp argument would be converted to an actual time using
parsedate(3).
Do
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 02:18:16PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
> I'd like to suggest adding new primitives
>
> -asince "timestamp"
> -csince "timestamp"
>
> where the timestamp argument would be converted to an actual time using
> parsedate(3).
>
> Does anyone else think this is a go
I often find myself (no pun intended!) wanting to determine which files
were accessed before/since a particular timestamp. There currently
exist the -{a,c}{newer,min,time} primitives, but none of these allow me
to say "since today at 5 AM".
I'd like to suggest adding new primitives
-
18 matches
Mail list logo
