On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 02:18:16PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote: > I'd like to suggest adding new primitives > > -asince "timestamp" > -csince "timestamp" > > where the timestamp argument would be converted to an actual time using > parsedate(3). > > Does anyone else think this is a good idea? Is there anyone who would > object to adding these primitives?
Yes, that looks good (I use "touch -d ... /tmp/mark" quite often for this, avoiding the temporary file would be great). Martin
