On Fri, 27 Sep 2024, tlaro...@kergis.com wrote:
I will finally learn english some day ;-)
Wait until we native English speakers can learn at least some
of it! :-)
+-+--+--+
| Paul Goyette (.sig) | PGP Key fingerprint: | E
zilla-rootcerts package?
++--+------+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses:|
| (Retired) | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | p...@whooppee.com|
| Software Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoy
r done anything (at least, not
deliberately) with certificates; reading and writing Email just works,
as does most browsing.
Will I need to do anything new (or differently) as a result of these
recent changes?
++--+------+
| Paul Goyette
On Sat, 29 Apr 2023, ?? wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 11:25:03PM +, RVP wrote:
On Fri, 28 Apr 2023, Paul Goyette wrote:
I propose the attached enhancement to chown/chgrp to avoid setting
a new user/group value if the desired values are already set. The
change is pretty simple.
I
Should I commit?
++--+------+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses:|
| (Retired) | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | p...@whooppee.com|
| Software Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoye...@netbsd.org |
| &am
t the extern
declaration in a .h file shared by the .c file defining it and the .c
files using it.
Pretty simple. Any objections?
Long overdue IMHO.
Go for it.
++--+--+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addr
t should be workable.
++--+------+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses:|
| (Retired) | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | p...@whooppee.com|
| Software Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoye...@netbsd.org |
| & Network Engineer | | pgoyett...@gmail.com |
++--+--+
On Mon, 14 Mar 2022, Taylor R Campbell wrote:
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2022 08:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Paul Goyette
On Tue, 15 Mar 2022, Simon Burge wrote:
Do we have any valid need to have non-critical local filesystems?
Well, I have a dedicated filesystem for builds, separate from my
OS. The
running (and receiving mail).
So, yeah, I think non-critical local filesystems are meaningful.
FWIW, I cannot spell zfs! :)
++--+--+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses:|
| (Retired) | FA29
or "__mcount_backend" or something like
that. Having both _mcount and __mcount is terrible, especially when
their roles are exchanged on ~half the ports we have.
Yeah, this really is begging for a clean-up.
++------+---+
| Paul
ment.
PLEASE! Go for it! :)
++--+-------+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired) | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | p...@whooppee.com |
| Software Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoye...@netbsd.org |
++--+---+
mised...
++--+---+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired) | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | p...@whooppee.com |
| Software Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoye...@netbsd.org |
++--+---+
as to invalidate existing
configurations could possibly be considered unintrusive.
Changing the syntax is indeed extremely intrusive.
++--+---+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired) |
t;not yet two decades old" ?
++--+-------+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired) | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | p...@whooppee.com |
| Software Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoye...@netbsd.org |
++--+---+
;
}
...etc
++--+---+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired) | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | p...@whooppee.com |
| Software Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoye
other statement" is frequently "add a
debug_printf()" and many is the time i've broken an if statement by
adding debug code.
++------+---+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
|
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020, Kimmo Suominen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:29:10AM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
Also note that when using ``cal -r'' it still displays 5 lines of
output, even though only 3 (or 4) lines contain any day-numbers.
This results in somewhat excessive vertical whi
26 27 28 29 30 31
#
-uwe
!DSPAM:5efa336781460411656!
++------+---+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired) | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | p...@whooppee.com |
| Software Developer
t can certainly be "disabled", but
why not override? Just like any other super-user thing, there's
no reason not to enable shoot-my-random-foot mode.
++--+-------+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail address
DHCP serving
on OpenBSD at least.
Is this to generic and we should have a _dhcpcd user or is _dhcp
satisfactory?
Separate dedicated user.
+1
++--+---+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Re
upport one or the other _np() variation.
There is no pressure for a change to do it now, soon or for NetBSD 9.0
and waiting some weeks/months is fine. If it will land NetBSD 10.0,
there will be no harm.
!DSPAM:5d4da392153981598017751!
++------+-
PAM:5ca863ca52041784745129!
++--+-------+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired) | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | p...@whooppee.com |
| Software Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoye...@netbsd.org |
++--+---+
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Paul Goyette wrote:
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Michael van Elst wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 08:39:24AM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
Hmmm. On my amd64 8.99.35 system, I get
# wsmuxctl -f /dev/wsmux1 -l
wskbd0
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Someone added a WSMUX_BELL
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Michael van Elst wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 08:39:24AM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
Hmmm. On my amd64 8.99.35 system, I get
# wsmuxctl -f /dev/wsmux1 -l
wskbd0
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
Someone added a WSMUX_BELL device but forgot to support it in wsmuxctl
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Paul Goyette wrote:
Hmmm. On my amd64 8.99.35 system, I get
# wsmuxctl -f /dev/wsmux1 -l
wskbd0
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
According to my dmesg, I should also have
wsbell0 at spkr0 mux 1
listed for mux1...
# gdb /usr/sbin/wsmuxctl
...
Reading symbols from
"A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
!DSPAM:5c9d63cc207191150611282!
++----------+---+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired) | FA29 0E3B 35AF
h red-green protanopic (?) color-blindness, we have
a deficiency in "red cones" which reduces the ability to distinguish red
from black. Red text would disappear on a black background.
+--+--+----+
| Paul Goyette | PGP
t or right!
+--+--+----+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired)| FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee dot com |
| Kernel Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at netbsd dot org |
+--+--++
he biggest attention-getter
for me, and often requires changing text from black to white to increase
contrast (especially important for red or purple backgrounds).
+--+--+----+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail
It's been solved already - it's in pkgsrc.
I am not objecting to implementing colorls (in whatever form), just
requesting that the default is, and will remain, OFF.
+--+--+--------+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerpri
or:" usually works for me. :)
+--+--+--------+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired)| FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee dot com |
| Kernel Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at netbsd dot org |
+--+--++
ustry standard and increase readability
"increase readability"? Not for me, sorry.
As another color-blind person, I agree with Chris - colorized ls
presents a reduction in readability, especially for red-on-black.
+--+--+-
twork gear out there that doesn't have a
built-in pseudo-browser-for-device-management.
On second thought, I think I'd prefer telnet over http anyway, even if
the device _did_ have a pseudo-browser. :)
+--+--+----+
| Pa
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
On 07.08.2018 00:30, Paul Goyette wrote:
While looking at some other stuff, I noticed that the operations
described in bitstring(3) and implement as macros in include/bitstring.h
can have a multiple-evaluation problem if the macro arguments have side
this, both in the man page and in
the code?
+--+--+----+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired)| FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee dot com |
| Kernel Developer |
uses.
Comments?
+--+--+----+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired)| FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee dot com |
| Kernel Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgo
On Thu, 1 Mar 2018, Simon Burge wrote:
Paul Goyette wrote:
In my case, I have a shell alias for
alias diff "diff -u"
'cuz most of the time I want a -u output. But once in a blue moon (or perhaps
once in a blue+super moon) I want a -y (side-by-side) output; it's
. But once in a blue moon (or perhaps
once in a blue+super moon) I want a -y (side-by-side) output; it's a real pain
to have to bypass the alias by specifying a complete path to /usr/bin/diff
:)
+--+--+--------+
| Paul Goyette
veral formats. The idea is also from
FreeBSD.
Trivial patch to the man page is not included.
Any objections or comments?
Sounds like a useful option. Go for it.
+--+--+----+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addr
On Mon, 19 Jun 2017, Paul Goyette wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jun 2017, Abhinav Upadhyay wrote:
I have just committed this:
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2017/06/18/msg085477.html
Could you give it a go and let me know how is it now :)
(you will have to rebuild the database with
y tomorrow.
+--+--+----+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired)| FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee dot com |
| Kernel Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Terry Moore wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jun 017, Paul Goyette wrote:
PG> Don't get me wrong, I love apropos(1). But...
PG> I'm continually bitten by the "stemming" that occurs. [...]
So am I. I completely switched over from "man -k" to an a
Martin
!DSPAM:59397143206401043911127!
+--+--++
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired)| FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee dot com |
| Kernel Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at netbsd dot org |
+--+--++
their
associated context! The vast majority of those entries are really for
"lf" (in either upper- or lower-case), and have no relation to lfs the
file system!
Would it be unreasonable to add a no-stem option to apropos(1)?
+--+------+-
t to stop doing that?
example output: http://i.imgur.com/AqTm9mq.png
I'm building kernel with 'scan-build make -j20'
Thanks.
Does disabling the diagnostics in the kernel help?
+--+------++
| Paul
foo" was not previously selected. I think we
should be consistent. So, rather than using a new keyword 'cno', just
change the current error into a warning.
+--+--++
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016, David Holland wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 05:19:54PM +, David Holland wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 08:10:27PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
> > In my opinion, the -user and -group primaries should work strictly with
> > _names_, and _never_ fall
s should work strictly with
_names_, and _never_ fallback to {u,g}id values; we could easily add
new primaries -uid and -gid to search for the numeric values. However,
this would make find(1) incompatible with existing versions.
Comments?
+--+------+--
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016, Paul Goyette wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016, Robert Elz wrote:
...
If you were also to add
{ "-newerat", N_ASINCE, c_asince, 1 }, /* gnu find
compat */
{ "-newerct", N_CSINCE, c_csince, 1 },
{ "-newermt", N_S
which
only use facilities actually implemented here, would work.
Would that really be such an evil thing?
For me, yes. I will not implement the ugly gnu stuff, neither in its
entirety nor partially.
+--+--+----+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key
sent. (Just
like my changes re resurrecting the ksem module, discussed last year...)
If anyone wants them, the diffs are attached.
+--+--+----+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired)
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:03:35 +0800 (PHT)
From:Paul Goyette
Message-ID:
| Does anyone have suggestions and web-sites for a couple of linux
| distros? I'm not going to check them all... :)
I'd assume they all us
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:06:42 +0800 (PHT)
From:Paul Goyette
Message-ID:
| > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 02:18:16PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
| >> I'd like to suggest adding new primitives
| >>
| >&
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Roy Marples wrote:
On 10/06/2016 10:03, Paul Goyette wrote:
Does anyone have suggestions and web-sites for a couple of linux
distros? I'm not going to check them all... :)
http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man1/find.1.html
Quite a few time related options.
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Simon Burge wrote:
Paul Goyette wrote:
I often find myself (no pun intended!) wanting to determine which files
were accessed before/since a particular timestamp. There currently
exist the -{a,c}{newer,min,time} primitives, but none of these allow me
to say "since
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Thomas Klausner wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 02:18:16PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
I often find myself (no pun intended!) wanting to determine which files were
accessed before/since a particular timestamp. There currently exist the
-{a,c}{newer,min,time} primitives, but
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 02:18:16PM +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
I'd like to suggest adding new primitives
-asince "timestamp"
-csince "timestamp"
where the timestamp argument would be converted to an actu
object to adding these primitives?
+--+--+----+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired)| FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee.com |
| Kernel Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at netbsd.org |
+--+--++
l at times, and at other times, not so much ...
+--+--+--------+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired)| FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 | paul at whooppee.com |
| Kernel Developer | 0786 F75
ave a sysctl knob to enable
it (with default of Disabled)? That way, you could get the needed
functionality, but only with an explicit action to acknowledge that you
are breaking all the contracts...
+--+--+----+
| Paul Goyette
; to regenerate the tools for the new
kernel version? Or USETOOLS=NO if it is something quick and dirty...
Or just add '-T /path/to/netbsd-6-tools' ??
+--+--+--------+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail add
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Paul Goyette wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Abhinav Upadhyay wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Paul Goyette wrote:
With bin/51062, makemandb(8) can index non-numeric sections and also
apropos(1) can now accept non-numeric sections for querying. That
means you do
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016, Abhinav Upadhyay wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 3:20 AM, Paul Goyette wrote:
With bin/51062, makemandb(8) can index non-numeric sections and also
apropos(1) can now accept non-numeric sections for querying. That
means you do queries like
apropos -s 9lua systm
apropos -s
Lua kernel bindings, ...
Note that the output says "intro (9)" - shouldn't it say "intro (9lua)"?
+--+--+--------+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired)| FA29 0
're in the vanguard of correctness,
and perhaps our efforts might be used by others to justify adopting the
updated standard.
:)
+--+--++
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired)
is run.
So I suggest that rc.d/envsys should get an additional
# BEFORE: powerd
line.
!DSPAM:56c5a2fa16832088018165!
+--+--+--------+
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired)| FA29 0
#dbcool_set_temp_limits).
It is unlikely that user-specified values will survive a reboot, unless
the chip has NVRAM. :) Otherwise, the chip will reset, and then the
BIOS gets its own chance to set start-up values.
+--+--++
| Paul Goyette | PGP
er)
logger -p warning "${0}: ($1) dropped below critical limit [${3}]" >&1
exit 0
;;
+------+--++
| Paul Goyette | PGP Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| (Retired)| FA29
68 matches
Mail list logo
