Re: recent changes to pthread_fork.c:fork() cause static linking to fail if the app provides its own malloc()

Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > On 14.07.2020 06:28, Martin Husemann wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 02:49:00AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > >> Replacing malloc is just as invalid from a strict standard compliance > >> perspective, so *shrug* > > > > Why is that? > > > > We have e.g. shells/s

re: recent changes to pthread_fork.c:fork() cause static linking to fail if the app provides its own malloc()

Martin Husemann writes: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 02:49:00AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > > Replacing malloc is just as invalid from a strict standard compliance > > perspective, so *shrug* > > Why is that? > > We have e.g. shells/standalone-tcsh that does it. Is it broken now? it was, yes

Re: recent changes to pthread_fork.c:fork() cause static linking to fail if the app provides its own malloc()

On 14.07.2020 06:28, Martin Husemann wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 02:49:00AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: >> Replacing malloc is just as invalid from a strict standard compliance >> perspective, so *shrug* > > Why is that? > > We have e.g. shells/standalone-tcsh that does it. Is it broken