Kamil Rytarowski wrote:

> On 14.07.2020 06:28, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 02:49:00AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> >> Replacing malloc is just as invalid from a strict standard compliance
> >> perspective, so *shrug*
> > 
> > Why is that?
> > 
> > We have e.g. shells/standalone-tcsh that does it. Is it broken now?
> > 
> > Martin
> > 
>
> There are many malloc wrappers or replacements for introspection, so
> this should be operational.
>
> We also deliver gnumalloc in base..

I suspect this also doesn't play well with devel/dmalloc then?

Cheers,
Simon.

Reply via email to