Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > On 14.07.2020 06:28, Martin Husemann wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 02:49:00AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > >> Replacing malloc is just as invalid from a strict standard compliance > >> perspective, so *shrug* > > > > Why is that? > > > > We have e.g. shells/standalone-tcsh that does it. Is it broken now? > > > > Martin > > > > There are many malloc wrappers or replacements for introspection, so > this should be operational. > > We also deliver gnumalloc in base..
I suspect this also doesn't play well with devel/dmalloc then? Cheers, Simon.