Re: wedge device to name

2019-09-18 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article , Michael van Elst wrote: >m...@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus) writes: > >>But since almost all commands do the NAME=label to /dev/device translation, >>you can take NAME=label as a device path. > >Only some NetBSD commands do. Most are old-fashioned and want file paths >to deal with, an

Re: wedge device to name

2019-09-18 Thread Michael van Elst
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 01:24:24PM -0700, John Nemeth wrote: > We just need the device path to be the name, which it already > is for LVMs. This is something that a devfs could do easily. :-> > More seriously, I do believe that a devfs would be a good thing. Ah, a can of worms, open too. :

Re: wedge device to name

2019-09-18 Thread John Nemeth
On Sep 18, 2:57pm, Michael van Elst wrote: } } >Is there a reason why we do not translate wedges devices to their name? } >I mean, df and mount report about /dev/dkN, which is not very helpful } >since it can change quickly. Reporting about NAME= seems a better idea. } } >In order to do it, we n

Re: wedge device to name

2019-09-18 Thread Michael van Elst
m...@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus) writes: >But since almost all commands do the NAME=label to /dev/device translation, >you can take NAME=label as a device path. Only some NetBSD commands do. Most are old-fashioned and want file paths to deal with, and that's where the current mount output may c

Re: wedge device to name

2019-09-18 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 02:57:39PM -, Michael van Elst wrote: > It's not necessarily a good idea to hide the dk devices, so that probably > needs to be an optional output. Also because there are people parsing > such output and expect a device path. But since almost all commands do the NAME=la

Re: wedge device to name

2019-09-18 Thread Michael van Elst
m...@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus) writes: >Hello >Is there a reason why we do not translate wedges devices to their name? >I mean, df and mount report about /dev/dkN, which is not very helpful >since it can change quickly. Reporting about NAME= seems a better idea. >In order to do it, we need a

wedge device to name

2019-09-18 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
Hello Is there a reason why we do not translate wedges devices to their name? I mean, df and mount report about /dev/dkN, which is not very helpful since it can change quickly. Reporting about NAME= seems a better idea. In order to do it, we need a reverse getfsspecname(), and use it everywhere r