m...@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus) writes:
>Hello
>Is there a reason why we do not translate wedges devices to their name?
>I mean, df and mount report about /dev/dkN, which is not very helpful
>since it can change quickly. Reporting about NAME= seems a better idea.
>In order to do it, we need a reverse getfsspecname(), and use it everywhere
>reasonable: df mount swapctl raidctl ... other ideas?
It's not necessarily a good idea to hide the dk devices, so that probably
needs to be an optional output. Also because there are people parsing
such output and expect a device path.
--
--
Michael van Elst
Internet: mlel...@serpens.de
"A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
