Re: Useless programs in base.tgz - bpm, ekermit...

2016-06-24 Thread coypu
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:27:01AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: > I added kermit (gkermit, which was later replaced with ekermit). I added > it because it is: > > A) Tiny > B) Essential for recovering damaged systems with only serial > console access. > > It's repeatedl

Re: Useless programs in base.tgz - bpm, ekermit...

2016-06-24 Thread Martin Husemann
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 04:45:27PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > Moving ATF infrastructure and RUMP into the test set: I have no strong > opinion on this. It doesn't cost enough space in my tmpfs chroots > compared to many other factors. Note that rump and compat are hacked^Wspecial treated w

Re: Useless programs in base.tgz - bpm, ekermit...

2016-06-24 Thread Joerg Sonnenberger
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 01:34:52PM +, co...@sdf.org wrote: > Hi, > > There's a lot of programs sticking around since a long time, and are > less useful today. at the very least, they do not need to be in > base.tgz, which means they take up space even in minimal installs. > > Examples: > eker

Re: Useless programs in base.tgz - bpm, ekermit...

2016-06-24 Thread Thor Lancelot Simon
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 01:34:52PM +, co...@sdf.org wrote: > Hi, > > There's a lot of programs sticking around since a long time, and are > less useful today. at the very least, they do not need to be in > base.tgz, which means they take up space even in minimal installs. > > Examples: > eker

Useless programs in base.tgz - bpm, ekermit...

2016-06-24 Thread coypu
Hi, There's a lot of programs sticking around since a long time, and are less useful today. at the very least, they do not need to be in base.tgz, which means they take up space even in minimal installs. Examples: ekermit in rescue, base.tgz bpm in base.tgz atf tests utilities in base.tgz I want

Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX

2016-06-24 Thread Christos Zoulas
In article , Charles Cui wrote: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >I tried to implement the unit test proposed by Christos, but needs more >clarifications. >Let me first describe my understanding of your test. >First created a thread with low priority, and let it grab the mutex. After >this step, you expect the thr

Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX

2016-06-24 Thread Charles Cui
I tried to implement the unit test proposed by Christos, but needs more clarifications. Let me first describe my understanding of your test. First created a thread with low priority, and let it grab the mutex. After this step, you expect the thread with low priority will increase. Then, created a t