On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:27:41PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:24:20PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've started using the classless-static-route option in dhcpd(8). This
> > was not as painless as possible because I missed some important
> > informati
On Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 02:10:09PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 01:31:20PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > On 08/06/18(Fri) 18:06, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > > Testing at the alternate DHCP lab (the one that serves beer) I find
> > > that
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 02:15:09PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 02:10:09PM +0200, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 01:31:20PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > > On 08/06/18(Fri) 18:06, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > >
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 03:12:52PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2009, Thordur I. Bjornsson wrote:
>
> > viq wrote on Fri 26.Jun'09 at 14:45:04 +0200
> >
> > > Since the user created during installation is somewhat marketed as "root
> > > replacement", shouldn't he be added to
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 04:44:45AM +1100, leon zadorin wrote:
> Man page for mount_vnd states:
> "
> The `c' partition of a vnd image should not be used. When a superblock
> becomes damaged, fsck_ffs(8) needs information contained in the disklabel
> to determine the location of alternate
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:11:21AM +1000, leon zadorin wrote:
> On 7/27/09, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 04:44:45AM +1100, leon zadorin wrote:
> >> Man page for mount_vnd states:
> >> "
> >> The `c' partition of a vn
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 11:01:24PM +0900, Christophe Prevotaux wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My machine is Running OpenBSD/amd64 4.6 (snapshot 02 Oct 2009)
>
>
> The kernel crashed on AHCI detection.
>
> ahci0 at pci0 dev 18 function 0 "ATI SB600 SATA" rev 0x00: apic 2 int 22 (irq
> 11), AHCI 1.1
> scsibus
I put the diff below together to add NO_CCB handling to ciss(4).
It has been beat on with on some new HP systems and no regressions
reported so far.
This diff removes the reservation of a couple of ccb's for bioctl
and sensor i/o's and let's the NO_CCB backpressure mechanism handle
the situations
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 11:37:08AM +, Steffen Beyer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one of our embedded systems, booting from ro-flash, refused to reboot.
> Analyzing the problem, I stumbled upon these lines:
>
> # set hostname, turn on network
> echo 'starting network'
> ifconfig -g carp carpdemote 128
>
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:45:29PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> This diff uses nitems in various places in sys/dev/pci.
> If this is wanted I'll do more sometime. No md5 changes.
>
> Ok?
ok krw@
Ken
>
> Index: adv_pci.c
> ==
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 05:29:19PM -0700, Bob Beck wrote:
> I'm not 100% disagreeing. .but you're still making kitty scared. I
> like mg being small and fast.
>
> All you need to do is look at vim to see how a small editor can be
> turned into a monster with extensions.
Because their extension ar
It may be a bit late to consider this for 4.7.
Ken
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 04:10:05PM +0300, ? ??? wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> could you please include to new release this patch to dhclient,
> based on FreeBSD dhclient's patch.
> The patch adds support of RFC 3442 (The Classless Static Rou
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 08:36:56PM -0800, bruce wrote:
> I've been trying to get OpenBSD working with a new Dell Inspiron
> Zino, and I've run into what I think may be a bug in mii_physubr.c.
>
> First, the symptoms:
>
> (1) /bsd.rd works just fine. I can use the BCM57780 GigE
> netwo
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 02:36:00PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 8:29 AM, Giuseppe Magnotta
> wrote:
> > Currently, the mbr will not check it there are many bootable partition
> > in the partition table. It simply start the first active partition it
> > found.
> >
> > I've ma
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 06:44:41PM -0700, Tobias Weingartner wrote:
> On Saturday, February 20, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> >
> > I vote with Ted. Booting, even the wrong partition, seems better to me
> > than not booting anything.
>
> The MBR is not really supposed
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:32:15PM -0400, Anders Langworthy wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 09:05:01PM -0400, Anders Langworthy wrote:
> >>
> >> Here is an updated diff with that in mind:
> >>
> >> Index: fdisk.8
> >>
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 08:08:32PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2010/03/26 17:47, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 01:35:28PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > > >
&
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 07:11:07PM +0200, Sebastian Rother wrote:
> This diff removes nic.mil because the US military does not provide
> whois informations anymore for serval years.
>
> Except this it adds the functionality to lookup IPv6 adresses
> using "whois %IP_v6%" which was not possible bef
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:51:28PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while playing with Nick Bender's auto-install stuff, I hit a problem:
>
>
> In src/distrib/i386/common/install.md, I see this code:
>
>
>
> NCPU=$(sysctl -n hw.ncpufound)
>
> ((NCPU > 1)) && { DEFAULTSETS="bs
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 10:42:08AM +0200, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
> Sometimes I'm reading code from the source tree and then stumble upon
> various things that I'm wondering if it's worth "fixing". These are
> not real bugs, which is the numero uno priority, but I'm wondering if
> anyone care about th
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:44:35PM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> It looks like adw(4) has never correctly supported >12 byte SCSI
> requests. It wants to copy from 12 bytes past the start of the CDB,
> but &xs->cmd[12] is actually 192 bytes past (and pointing at who knows
> what).
>
> However,
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 04:02:16PM +0200, Philipp Schafft wrote:
> reflum,
>
> On Mon, 2010-06-21 at 12:44 -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> > It looks like adw(4) has never correctly supported >12 byte SCSI
> > requests. It wants to copy from 12 bytes past the start of the CDB,
> > but &xs->cmd[12
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 04:45:24PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> Is anyone actually using pkg_info -l ?
>
> It's an annoying flag that's not even implemented consistently,
> and I would like to actually kill it.
>
I don't even know what it is. So, I'm a no.
Ken
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 01:55:30PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> New drives have much more sophisticated IO queueing algorithms and
> posses much more information about the physical limitations of drive
> platters (or lack thereof) than an OS can ever hope to have. So switch
> SCSI (and SATA) dr
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 01:36:34PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:45:08 +0200
> > From: Claudio Jeker
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 09:48:03AM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> > > Anyone still using ioprbs(4)? If so, please test the diff below and
> > > report back to
There is a problem with pms/pmsi mice vs suspend/resume. On my
eeepc 1000HE for instance.
The diff below is the latest and possibly last attempt before 4.8
is locked to get this working without adversely affecting existing
performance.
If this doesn't get tested enough, all recent changes to get
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:25:10AM +0200, Thomas de Grivel wrote:
> For the record, i met a couple problems with the snapshot install
>
> - when selecting custom layout of an existing OpenBSD partition,
> the disklabel utility had kept the mount points from the auto
> layout, and refused that i s
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 09:53:15AM -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> The diff below gets rid of the useless "struct dkdriver" field and its
> many "notyet" fields.
>
> I sent this diff out shortly before the release and got one or two
> oks, but didn't want to conflict with some of the changes jsing
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 07:43:18AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> returning here without calling usb_transfer_complete() can cause
> the usbtask thread to sleep forever, which breaks all usb devices
> that use usb_tasks.
>
> --
> jake...@sdf.lonestar.org
> SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 08:51:50PM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 12:34:19AM +1000, Jonathan Gray wrote:
> > Currently rarpd can only listen on all or one interface, the
> > following lets multiple interfaces be specified like dhcpd.
>
> previous diff missed usage as pointed
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 09:34:30AM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Thordur I Bjornsson
> wrote:
> > +/* Global vfs data structures for cd9660. */
> > +struct vops cd9660_vops = {
> > + .vop_default= eopnotsupp,
> > + .vop_lookup = cd9660_lookup,
> >
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 07:07:03PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> Kenneth R Westerback writes:
>
> > Man, another reason to get my vax up to -current. Sigh. :-)
>
> More idle curiosity than anything else (although I occasionally get
> that question myself), how lo
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 10:26:14PM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
> this diff is largely a mechanical change.
>
> firstly, it makes struct bufq a member of the softc for devices
> that use it, rather than it being a pointer to something that needs
> to be allocated at attach. since all these devices n
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 09:35:17AM +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 23:31:25 +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > The Xorg xserver runs a scary amount of code in a signal handler.
> > It's supposed to make your mouse cursor move more smoothly, but I
> > can't spot the difference when
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 12:39:52PM +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 06:30:05 -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 09:35:17AM +0200, LEVAI Daniel wrote:
> [...]
> > > However, using this option, after starting firefox everything
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 08:09:48AM +0059, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> from a recent commit from j...@freebsd. any chess heads want to yay or
> nay it?
>
> i'll add the whole fortune after the diff for convenience.
>
> jmc
http://www.xs4all.nl/~timkr/records/records.htm, 'Shortest Game' link.
Some s
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 12:24:41PM +0059, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 06:55:11AM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 08:09:48AM +0059, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > > from a recent commit from j...@freebsd. any chess heads want to y
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 12:24:41PM +0059, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 06:55:11AM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 08:09:48AM +0059, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > > from a recent commit from j...@freebsd. any chess heads want to y
On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 07:58:42PM +0159, Han Boetes wrote:
> Jason McIntyre wrote:
> > I would say maybe not to stick the url in. otherwise fine by me.
>
> I second that.
>
>
>
> # Han
I committed it w/o the link.
Ken
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 01:09:39AM -0500, Philip Guenther wrote:
> The amd64 pmap keeps track of which cpu(s) a given pmap is in use on, so
> that when the pmap's page tables are modified it can send IPIs to the
> neccessary processors to have them invalidate those pages in their caches.
> Unfo
canacar@ came up with this just before release, so it didn't go in
at that time. So here it is again. Fixes filtering based on subnets,
and it works for me (tm). i.e.
tcpdump -pflog0 -n -vv net 192.197.205.0/24
will now show packets for 192.197.205.0/24, when before it did not.
ok?
Ken
In
More specifically, make handling of resid consistant and at least
superficially correct. Triggered by the hack I had to commit to fix
a problem with a large un-tar from my ahci DAT drive.
A cookie for those who can show any semantic change I made outside
of the calculation and usage of resid's.
A
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 04:37:39PM +0200, Reyk Floeter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> landry@ sees many log messages 'DHCPINFORM from xx but ciaddr yy is
> not consistent with actual address' in a setup where dhcpd runs behind
> dhcrelay.
>
> The code in dhcpd's dhcpinform() seems wrong - it assumes that ciadd
The OpenBSD Foundation is happy to announce that Microsoft has made
a significant financial donation to the Foundation. This donation
is in recognition of the role of the Foundation in supporting the
OpenSSH project. This donation makes Microsoft the first Gold level
contributor in the OpenBSD Foun
The diff below is a first cut at making softraid usable on today's
larger and larger disks which use 4096-byte sectors.
It allows building softraid volumes with such devices, and even
building volumes that mix 'classic' 512-byte sector devices with
'avante garde' 4k-sector devices.
Unlikely to be
2014 was the most successful year to date for the OpenBSD Foundation.
Both in the amount of money we raised and in the support we provided
for the OpenBSD and related projects. We are extremely grateful for
the support shown by our contributers large and small.
A detailed summary of the Foundation
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:58:51PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> In order to define a proper API for our routine table, I'd like to turn
> the "struct rt_addrinfo" into a private type (ie: only used in route.c
> and rtsock.c).
>
> This type is used by a lost of code in our network stack to add o
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 01:54:34PM +0200, Mike Belopuhov wrote:
> On 27 August 2013 13:39, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > I think that's the right approach but the current code generating
> > interfaces indexes is too clever from my point of view, it tries
> > to reuse the last index if possible. Thi
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 03:38:49PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> So I started to play with the routine table and I'm slowly trying to
> unify the various code paths to add and delete route entries. The
> diff below is a first step, it splits rtinit() into rt_add() and
> rt_delete() there should
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 02:54:11PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
> Updated diff, with small tweaks from Andres Perera,
> * int -> size_t, signedness issue, even if it can't be >INT_MAX
> * NULL -> NUL
>
>
> Index: exec_elf.c
> ===
>
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 08:44:26PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
> On 08/28/13 16:30, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 02:54:11PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
> >> Updated diff, with small tweaks from Andres Perera,
> >> * int -> size_t, sign
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 09:43:24PM +0200, Maxime Villard wrote:
> On 08/28/13 20:57, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Maxime Villard wrote:
> >> + /* Ensure interp is a valid, NUL-terminated string
> >> */
> >> + for (n = 0; n
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 06:23:25AM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> Assuming we want to make this a non-fatal error the following should
> do.
>
> - todd
>
> Index: usr.sbin/user/user.c
> ===
> RCS file: /home/cvs/openbsd/src/usr.sbin
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 12:43:51PM +0200, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Diff below is just a small refactoring of two similar code chunks to
> inform user processes that something changed regarding a route.
>
> I'd like to get this in because it removes one use of rt_addrinfo in
> netinet6.
>
> There'
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:53:50PM +0300, Valentin Zagura wrote:
> I don't think I'm more paranoid than the average considering that Debian
> has a way to do this (http://www.debian.org/CD/verify), fedora has a way to
> do this (https://fedoraproject.org/verify), even Freebsd has a way to do
> this
t easely show his security
> >assessor that it has the right images using some "industry standard" ways,
> >or someone living in a country that has an oppressive government and would
> >download the image through tor could have some problems if the exit node is
> >malic
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 07:52:22PM +0300, Valentin Zagura wrote:
> > There is no entity
> > that owns or can be held responsible for the code, or is capable
> > of providing a solid evidentuary path from commit to your hands.
>
> I thought if we buy the CDs we WILL get "a solid evidentuary path fr
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:13:36AM +0300, Valentin Zagura wrote:
> Security itself is not the primary issue here. The issue is to easily prove
> an assessor "without reasonable doubt" that you are running the right thing.
> They will not worry about governments trying to break in with MITM signed
>
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 03:24:25PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The error return codes for the enc interface seem quite inconsistent.
> Always return the appropriate errno.
>
> ok?
>
> bluhm
>
> Index: net/if_enc.c
> ===
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 06:56:04PM +0200, Alexander Bluhm wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 12:00:40PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > I'm not sure what the 'rule' is regarding ENOMEM and ENOBUFS, but
> > ENOMEN seems more appropriate to me.
>
> ma
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:32:30PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Some re(4) variants now use msi. Unfortunately the interrupt handler
> isn't careful enough, and we might miss an interrupt. The diff below
> seems to fix that by disabling the interrupts while processing an
> interrupt. This is wh
On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 09:32:30PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> Some re(4) variants now use msi. Unfortunately the interrupt handler
> isn't careful enough, and we might miss an interrupt. The diff below
> seems to fix that by disabling the interrupts while processing an
> interrupt. This is wh
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 03:22:36PM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 22:34:26 -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
>
> > > @@ -552,11 +552,16 @@ ELFNAME2(exec,makecmds)(struct proc *p,
> > >
> > > for (i = 0, pp = ph; i < eh->e_phn
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 10:51:43PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
> LLVM errors out on the i2o code with the following warning..
>
> ../../../../dev/i2o/iop.c:2399:42: error: comparison of unsigned expression <
> 0 is always false [-Werror,-Wtautological-compare]
> pt->pt_nbufs < 0 || pt->p
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 02:24:22AM +1000, David Gwynne wrote:
>
> On 5 Nov 2013, at 12:40 am, Kenneth R Westerback
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 10:51:43PM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
> >> LLVM errors out on the i2o code with the following warning..
> >
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 08:36:23PM +0100, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> Without this driver, it's impossible to upgrade my PowerMac7,3 without
> hearing a fan symphony.
>
> ok?
As long as all the media still fit this is ok krw@. I don't think
there are many in macppc.
Ken
>
> Index: conf/RAM
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:28:56AM +, Alexey E. Suslikov wrote:
> Martin Pieuchot nolizard.org> writes:
>
> > - case IFT_FDDI:
> > - case IFT_ATM:
> > case IFT_IEEE1394:
>
> any plans for FireWire? :)
>
Nope. :-)
Ken
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 04:50:17PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> bad form, i think, to have a local variable shadow a global.
I like it. ok krw@
Ken
>
> Index: kern_clock.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/kern/kern_clock.c,v
> re
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 04:15:10PM -0800, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> The patch below extends dhclient to mimic this logic from ISC DHCP's
> linux script:
>
> if [ "x$new_subnet_mask" = "x255.255.255.255" ] ; then
> route add -host $router dev $interface
> fi
> route
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:57:41AM -0800, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:48:05PM -0500, Kenneth Westerback wrote:
> > Rfc 3442 is what I referred to.
>
> I don't think RFC 3442 discusses what to do with /32 IP address
> assignments though?
No, that was my point. i.e. don't av
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 12:47:19PM -0800, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 02:10:21PM -0500, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > No, that was my point. i.e. don't avoid adding the route when given
> > a /32 address just because class static routes are also present
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 07:24:19PM -0500, Adam Jensen wrote:
> I recently (last night) installed OpenBSD-5.4-amd64 on an
> HP-Proliant ML370-G4 that has a Smart Array 6404 controller card in
> a 64-bit, 133-MHz PCI-X slot. It has two Ultra320 SCSI channels and
> 192MB of RAM cache. One SCSI channel
This seems to fix growfs on 4k-sector drives by doing the test write
to the last sector rather than the last 512-byte block, which can't be
accessed directly on 4k-sector drives.
Any other growfs users out there want to test on 'normal' drives?
Ken
Index: growfs.c
==
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:47:37AM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 07:01:04PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > Works on my crypto volume. People with other volume types would be nice
> > to hear from.
> >
> > Ken
>
>
We never allocate >253 scb's, and thus tag collisions should not
be possible if they are correctly initialized. This diff just rips
out the existing collision code. I haven't yet determined if we
need to initialize tags differently.
It is a prerequisite for iopoolification and testing on any ahd
h
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 06:19:32PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> so i wanna change the world order a bit again.
> basically, no part of the tree should bother with setting tcp and udp
> checksums. when they are needed, the stack just sets these flags, and
> ip_output / ip6_output do the checksum t
On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 03:19:00PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Peter Hessler wrote:
> > I use silent ping very often (especially in scripts and cronjobs), and it
> > pisses me off that I need to redirect to /dev/null. I'm scratching an
> > itch, here.
>
> Sorry, I
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:08:05AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I got little feedeback on this diff posed in a rather long thread, so
> I am posting it again.
>
> Please test this, it makes fsck_ffs much faster (especially with -p)
> and less memory hungry in a lot of cases.
>
> Note th
This has been posted a few times with no feedback I can remember. This is
a last chance to test before you become involuntary testers! It will be
committed very soon, with c2k11 on the horizon to deal with any fallout.
Ken
Index: ic/cac.c
As with cac(4). You can test now or can break later.
Ken
Index: ic/gdt_common.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/ic/gdt_common.c,v
retrieving revision 1.55
diff -u -p -r1.55 gdt_common.c
--- ic/gdt_common.c 12 Oct 2010 00:53:3
Classful routing is no longer widely used. Our current support
for DHCP option 33 (DHO_STATIC_ROUTES) does not treat the provided
information as classful routes but as host routes.
Is this deliberate or accidental on our part?
If accidental I would recommend the diff below, removing the handling
No need to copy bugs@, tech@ and misc@. One is enough. I pick tech@.
There a few size_t vs ssize_t inconsistencies but this looks very
good for a start. I would suggest that as we are changing strtol and
atoi calls that we take the opportunity to replace them with strtonum
calls.
Ken
On Sat
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 11:20:09AM -0400, Steven R. Gerber wrote:
> Hi folks.
> Current rdist will timeout with files >2GB, log as finished, but will
> not die.
> The bug (system/6586) was originally noted by IBM (AIX) in 2006:
> https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg1IY85396
> I
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 03:21:40PM -0400, Steven R. Gerber wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 4/9/2011 1:04 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > When you print and off_t, for portability you should use:
> >
> > "%lld", (long long)offt
> >
> >
> >
I'm a bit confused b
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 09:19:12PM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> Hi!
>
> wskbd_holdscreen() is not needed and can be removed. ok?
>
> --
> Alexandr Shadchin
ok krw@
Ken
>
> Index: wskbd.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:35:18AM +0600, Alexandr Shadchin wrote:
> Updating state LED only when necessary. ok?
>
> --
> Alexandr Shadchin
>
> Index: wskbd.c
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/dev/wscons/wskbd.c,v
> retrieving revision
If we are trying to create a faux fstab for a disk, it should include
any swap partitions on the disk. Other than general aesthetic appeal,
this will help the install script.
Anybody know of reasons not to included the swap partitions in -F|-f
output?
Ken
Index: editor.c
===
On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 05:48:03PM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 12:11:19PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > If we are trying to create a faux fstab for a disk, it should include
> > any swap partitions on the disk. Other than general aesthetic appeal
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 07:26:28AM +0100, Jason McIntyre wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 07:29:27PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> >
> > My suggested man page tweaks are below.
> >
> > Ken
> >
r1.18 of rdist/docmd.c changed
while ((len = read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) != (size_t)-1)
to
while ((len = read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf))) > 0)
when fixing PR#5009. Which allowed detection of a return value of 0,
i.e. end of file. However len is size_t and thus does not grok -1
and th
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 01:15:11AM +0200, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> Hi Matthew and Joachim,
>
> Matthew Dempsky wrote on Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:34:50AM -0700:
>
> > The issue here (if any) is that we over-specify the *successful*
> > return value as precisely 0, rather than generally non-negative.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 12:21:57PM +0200, Peter Hessler wrote:
> When I'm installing over a serial line, I would expect to use that as my
> console in the future. This diff sets the default console to the one we
> are currently using, so it's just another [enter]. (The style is based
> on the xdm
gdt(4) man page says 'transparent raw SCSI mode' is unsupported.
The code just returns errors to any attempts to submit i/o. I'm
pretty sure nobody is going to add support so eliminate the framework
for it.
Shrinks the iopool diff.
Any dissenting voices?
Ken
Index: share/man/man4/gdt.4
==
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:52:46PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> Little feedback on this,
>
> If you have good reasons to keep the ability to convert and/or check
> (very) old ffs on-disk formats, speak up now.
>
> -Otto
Let the old crap molder in the grave and not disturb us. If you want
OPENDEV_PART means "try tacking a 'c' onto the end of the
provided device name when opening the device". The tape devices
opened by mt and chio don't have 'c' partitions so it's
kinda useless to try opening them before just trying the
'bare' provided device.
The curious can examine lib/libutil/ope
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:12:40AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:13:47PM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >
> > Second version of diff. This is a conservative one, i.e. it does not
> > change randomization in any way. The diff achieves a speedup by:
> >
> > - Move from l
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:58:16AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2011/05/04 16:11, Martin Pieuchot wrote:
> > >
> > > Looks good! Unfortunately the G4 mini (which has the MPC7447A)
> > > doesn't support this.
> >
> > Can you send me your device-tree dump? If it's really a MPC7447A (not a
>
And by using opendev(3) tunefs can accept disk UID's.
Any actual tunefs(8) guru's out there who can explain what this
might break?
Inspired by oga@'s work on atactl.
This is the last use of opendisk(3) in the tree. Any reason to
keep it if this goes in? ports?
Ken
Index: tunefs.c
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:51:22AM +0100, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:59:52PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > And by using opendev(3) tunefs can accept disk UID's.
> >
> > Any actual tunefs(8) guru's out there who can ex
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 08:09:16AM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:51:22AM +0100, Owain Ainsworth wrote:
> > On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 11:59:52PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
> > > And by using opendev(3) tunefs can accept disk UID's.
1 - 100 of 318 matches
Mail list logo
