On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 03:53:09PM +0200, Benny Lofgren wrote:
> On 2015-07-17 08:57, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > The phrase "No label changes." was selected because it is true
> > (there is nothing to save). I don't see what "further" adds to make
> > this more accurate or understandable.
>
> Perha
On 2015-07-17 08:57, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> The phrase "No label changes." was selected because it is true
> (there is nothing to save). I don't see what "further" adds to
> make this more accurate or understandable.
I would even argue that adding "further" makes it more INaccurate and
also adds
>This is another trivial patch, but I've always found the disklabel
>message "No label changes" confusing. For example, if you print (p), add
>a label (a), write (w), print to check your changes (p), and then quit
>(q), it seems odd to be told "No label changes".
>
>
>
>Index: sbin/disklabel/edito
> This is another trivial patch, but I've always found the disklabel
> message "No label changes" confusing. For example, if you print (p), add
> a label (a), write (w), print to check your changes (p), and then quit
> (q), it seems odd to be told "No label changes".
Well, the current message mak
