On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 03:53:09PM +0200, Benny Lofgren wrote: > On 2015-07-17 08:57, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > The phrase "No label changes." was selected because it is true > > (there is nothing to save). I don't see what "further" adds to make > > this more accurate or understandable. > > Perhaps phrasing the message "No unsaved label changes" instead would > make both camps happy? > > In my mind that wording clearly explains what just went on, while also > taking into account what might likely have been done earlier in the > edit session.
Good call. I wasn't really happy with the phrasing I suggested either - yours sounds much better. I should probably cut out my bikeshedding, though.
