If it's over 200? 250? You must put a value on the donation receipt.
Nearly every donation I've made has that, including goods to goodwill
or the Salvation Army.
Matthew
(sent from my mobile)
> On Dec 24, 2015, at 6:20 PM, Starchy Grant wrote:
>
> It looks like I was mistaken anyway - we do no
es w/ card holder data are the more important ones. I suspect your
commerce servers are the ones that are more likely to need to be on time and
online, since you’ve probably got actual datacenter & UPS. Corporate is
normally less important, and might even be out of scope...
Matthew Barr
mb...@mbarr.net
c: (646) 727-0535
___
Tech mailing list
Tech@lists.lopsa.org
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
http://lopsa.org/
This is a bit odd, but I wanted to sanity check things w/ ya’ll.
We have an interesting environment, where nearly everything is statically
linked. We also have a fairly extensive set of code to compile, from base
components & libraries all the way up to the final applications. Many of them
ha
You can do it with VPC peering. Default VPC is a convince, but not
hard to replicate. The new one won't be the default, but it'll be ok.
Or, you could use subnets inside 172.31, within issue, I believe.
Haven't tried that, but peering was easy and simple.
Sent from my iPad
> On Dec 10, 2014,
he same
thing as using the shell to configure your systems.
— and consider using a template engine (erb, etc) to process the cloud
formation stack when you hit your pain point….
(Why yes, I’ve been working in AWS for the past year. Heavily.)
Matthew Barr
mb...@mbarr.net
_
2.51.
>
> After manually applying the update from http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1769,
> the vulnerability goes away, and I'm at 3.2.53.
They haven’t pushed it via Software Update, as far as I know.
It does require 10.9.5 to be applied on 10.9, however.
Matthew
Matthew Barr
mb...@
It's going to be every region over the next few days. Pretty much every
hypervisor is getting a security patch, including RDS & Elasticcache system
hosts.
We had over 65 nodes over 4 regions for one small account.
Sent from my iPad
On Sep 28, 2014, at 9:58 AM, Derek Balling wrote:
You're awar
On Fri, 16 May 2014, Edward Ned Harvey (lopser) wrote:
> Have you looked into who's behind creating DMARC? AOL, Google,
> Microsoft, Yahoo, Facebook, Comcast, and others.
Something to consider is that it was *also* created by Paypal & banks, which
are frequently spoofed/phished. Not to mentio
On Apr 22, 2013, at 7:17 PM, Skylar Thompson wrote:
> Oooh, does this mean they're getting rid of Satellite? As a current Satellite
> user, I can't say I'm surprised. We've been wanting to get off Satellite for
> years, but the amount of time and money we waste on keeping it running have
> so
.
Well, RH is starting to focus on Puppet, to integrate w/ their Satellite
replacement. They're integrating Foreman into Katello, which is the upstream
of CloudForms.
It'll be interesting to see how this all shakes out.
Matthew Barr
mb...@mbarr.net
c: (646) 727-0535
__
teresting- may have to try that in the near future.)
Matthew Barr
mb...@mbarr.net
c: (646) 727-0535
___
Tech mailing list
Tech@lists.lopsa.org
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators
http://lopsa.org/
a bunch of scripts in various places, and did require fixing.
Matthew
Matthew Barr
mb...@mbarr.net
c: (646) 727-0535
___
Tech mailing list
Tech@lists.lopsa.org
https://lists.lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tech
This list provided by the League of P
On Oct 2, 2012, at 3:40 PM, da...@lang.hm wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Oct 2012, Aaron Hall wrote:
>
>> We're considering ways to provide redundant DHCP to maintain service
>> should our (physical) server go down suddenly. We're using isc-dhcpd on
>> RHEL. One server handles all of campus, and it's not br
>From what I remember, they added RHEL 6 in 4.1 or so. It might have
been added in 4.0.1, though...
Sent from my iPad
On Jun 28, 2012, at 12:06 PM, Mathew Snyder wrote:
> Our virtual platform is currently hosted with a company that strangely still
> uses ESXi 4.0. We have the ability to insta
You may want to look at Ovirt, which helps with management of the VM's - it's
the upstream of RHEV.
It currently works well w/ Fedora as the host, but I'm planning to use it for
Centos & RHEL guests.
On May 19, 2012, at 2:11 PM, Andrew Hume wrote:
> any recommendations for/against any pa
I'm researching a new build of my mailserver. I'd like to figure out what's
the best option for dealing w/ Antispam / AV, as well as the other processes..
I know of 2 major choices- do it your self, or outsource. I'm not
looking to outsource the entire thing, though.. just AV/AS.
1. Out
16 matches
Mail list logo
