I'm willing to help out, but as soon as school starts in the fall I
spend the next 9 months just trying to keep my head above water.
Anything we can get done between now and August 12th, count me in for.
Todd
On Jul 8, 2005, at 5:12 AM, Hugo Palma wrote:
Your right, it's not so much, but it
.
Br,
Norbi
- Original Message - From: "Hugo Palma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tapestry users"
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: proposal: central component repository workgroup
Your right, it's not so much, but it's enough to get the pro
Palma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tapestry users"
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2005 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: proposal: central component repository workgroup
Your right, it's not so much, but it's enough to get the project
started. I'm guessing as soon as the project is create
ok, i post...
ציטוט Hugo Palma:
Your right, it's not so much, but it's enough to get the project
started. I'm guessing as soon as the project is created and an
announcement is made more people will join in. But still i'd like to
hear from Tapestry developers, what's their opinion on this ? Ar
ay, July 08, 2005 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: proposal: central component repository workgroup
Your right, it's not so much, but it's enough to get the project
started. I'm guessing as soon as the project is created and an
announcement is made more people will join in. But still i'd like
Your right, it's not so much, but it's enough to get the project
started. I'm guessing as soon as the project is created and an
announcement is made more people will join in. But still i'd like to
hear from Tapestry developers, what's their opinion on this ? Are they
willing to give some suppor
I would say 3 Developers to brainstorm is not so much :-/
What happend to all the enthusiast posters to the thread above?
ציטוט Ron Piterman:
Hi all,
There were many idees and proposals on that subjects in the long thread
above.
I would like to sugest the following:
To ground a work-group c
IL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tapestry users"
Sent: Wednesday, 6 July 2005 11:16 p.m.
Subject: Re: proposal: central component repository workgroup
> I was wondering about a swing/awt port.
> Has anyone ever made an attempt at recreating all those desktop standard
> components i
Count me in too..
On 7/6/05, Hugo Palma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I totally agree with the described process.
> Work on this should be started asap, i think it would be great to have
> something to show by the time 4.0 is final.
> I think i'll manage some spare time to help build this project,
How about this for a desktop:
http://robin.sourceforge.net/
(I've seen others, but googling didn't help much.)
We already have some great components for Tapestry.
It would be good to see them brought together into the same stable,
with standard docs, online demos and painless out-of-box usage.
T
I think that's actually part of the idea behind Wicket.
Todd
On Jul 6, 2005, at 10:16 AM, Ivano wrote:
I was wondering about a swing/awt port.
Has anyone ever made an attempt at recreating all those desktop
standard components in a web-application component library?
Is it not interesting eno
I was wondering about a swing/awt port.
Has anyone ever made an attempt at recreating all those desktop standard
components in a web-application component library?
Is it not interesting enough to be able to port all the UI
functionalities of an application from desktop to web and back?
Are there
Make sure you post that to the new "Tapestry Component Repository?"
project mailing list. When it's created of course :o)
Cheers
Hugo
Dov Rosenberg wrote:
You guys should check out Project Wonder from the WebObjects guru's. It
contains a lot of cool components that encompass some great b
You guys should check out Project Wonder from the WebObjects guru's. It
contains a lot of cool components that encompass some great best practices
and has become the basis for a lot of successful projects.
http://wonder.sourceforge.net/
HTH
Good Luck
Dov Rosenberg
Conviveon/Inquira Corporation
I totally agree with the described process.
Work on this should be started asap, i think it would be great to have
something to show by the time 4.0 is final.
I think i'll manage some spare time to help build this project, so count
me in.
Cheers
Hugo
Ron Piterman wrote:
Hi all,
There were
15 matches
Mail list logo
