I was wondering about a swing/awt port.
Has anyone ever made an attempt at recreating all those desktop standard
components in a web-application component library?
Is it not interesting enough to be able to port all the UI
functionalities of an application from desktop to web and back?
Are there any issue requiring so much trouble to manage that no one
thought it worth the pain?
Is the java desktop library so poor that it's not interesting as a
starting point for a web-based library?
I was thinking in general terms, and not only specifically pointing at
the tapestry framework.
Anyone has an answer?
Bye
Ivano Pagano.
Dov Rosenberg wrote:
You guys should check out Project Wonder from the WebObjects guru's. It
contains a lot of cool components that encompass some great best practices
and has become the basis for a lot of successful projects.
http://wonder.sourceforge.net/
HTH
Good Luck
Dov Rosenberg
Conviveon/Inquira Corporation
On 7/6/05 8:03 AM, "Hugo Palma" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I totally agree with the described process.
Work on this should be started asap, i think it would be great to have
something to show by the time 4.0 is final.
I think i'll manage some spare time to help build this project, so count
me in.
Cheers
Hugo
Ron Piterman wrote:
Hi all,
There were many idees and proposals on that subjects in the long
thread above.
I would like to sugest the following:
To ground a work-group consisted of members of the tapestry community,
which will follow the idee and realize it.
I guess we have to make some kind of specification.
1)First define our goal,
2)then make a detailed technical specification as of how this would be
realized.
The Tapestry official developers would be encouraged to help, review
aso, specially, but not only, in milesstones, like before something is
being agreed upon.
After that, we can get to work and code and code and code...
I thing for specification definition a sourceforge project can give
the needed logistics of cvs, mailing lists, forum and so.
gmane.org offers mailing lists binding, and I would suggest naming the
lists in gmane under the official tapestry name
(gmane.comp.java.tapestry.component-repository ?) but that should
depend on the approval of howard.
Cheers,
Ron
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
