Re: On-the-fly UI construction

2006-03-31 Thread Paul Russell
On 31 Mar 2006, at 10:31, Pedro Abelleira Seco wrote: I would be interested in that code. Actually what I'm thinking about is to being able to package my application in modules and be able to have them integrate in the main application (adding menú entries, etc) simply by dropping the jars i

Re: On-the-fly UI construction

2006-03-31 Thread Aslak Gronflaten
I'm also interested. I posted a question about this earlier, and was basically told it was not doable out of the box (can't contribute libraries via hivemind), but if you succeed, please post! Thanks, Aslak On 3/31/06, Pedro Abelleira Seco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would be interested in t

Re: On-the-fly UI construction

2006-03-31 Thread Pedro Abelleira Seco
I would be interested in that code. Actually what I'm thinking about is to being able to package my application in modules and be able to have them integrate in the main application (adding menú entries, etc) simply by dropping the jars in the classpath. Have anyone done this? Regards Pedro El

Re: On-the-fly UI construction

2006-03-30 Thread Paul Russell
On 30 Mar 2006, at 22:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paul, I would love to see the resulting code [for auto-inclusion of libraries]. Thanks for offering. Cheers, - Mike No problems at all. It'll probably be early next week before I get a chance to tidy up the approach a bit (it's currentl

Re: On-the-fly UI construction

2006-03-30 Thread Mike . Barber
Paul, I would love to see the resulting code. Thanks for offering. Cheers, - Mike Paul Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/30/2006 11:18 AM Please respond to "Tapestry users" To "Tapestry users" cc Subject Re: On-the-fly UI construction On 30 Mar 2006

RE: On-the-fly UI construction

2006-03-30 Thread Raphaël Jean
a look at your code when your get a chance. Thanks, Raphael Jean EntropySoft > -Original Message- > From: Paul Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: jeudi 30 mars 2006 21:19 > To: Tapestry users > Subject: Re: On-the-fly UI construction > > On 30 Mar 2006, at

RE: On-the-fly UI construction

2006-03-30 Thread Mark Stang
'Tapestry users' Subject: RE: On-the-fly UI construction That he does, but it still seems hacky to me. Are you doing the PageRenderListener stuff so that your components can be "set up" by the enclosing page? What I did for that sort of situation is put a "decorator pipe

RE: On-the-fly UI construction

2006-03-30 Thread James Carman
riginal Message- From: Mark Stang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 2:24 PM To: Tapestry users; Tapestry users Subject: RE: On-the-fly UI construction Yeah, looked at it and also at something someone else had created called "Dynamic Block" or something like that.

RE: On-the-fly UI construction

2006-03-30 Thread Mark Stang
e he wrote. I could be wrong, but he seemed to have an idea about how this whole Tapestry thing works. -Original Message- From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/30/2006 11:33 AM To: 'Tapestry users' Subject: RE: On-the-fly UI construction That seems somewhat (

Re: On-the-fly UI construction

2006-03-30 Thread Paul Russell
On 30 Mar 2006, at 19:20, Mike Henderson wrote: Hi, I'd be interested in seeing if a T4 version of DynamicBlock helps: http://www.behindthesite.com/blog/C1931765677/E20060309215538/ index.html It's a complete rewrite from the T3 version and should address Howard's concerns. It actually

RE: On-the-fly UI construction

2006-03-30 Thread James Carman
stry users; Tapestry users Subject: RE: On-the-fly UI construction Where we have a Finite State Machine ("the Tasklet") which has states. The State Name is what we use to look up the component. So, as we progress through the state machine the states change and so does the component rende

RE: On-the-fly UI construction

2006-03-30 Thread Mark Stang
component.render(writer, cycle); } } regards, Mark -Original Message- From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/30/2006 11:11 AM To: 'Tapestry users' Subject: RE: On-the-fly UI construction We do something similar in Trails already. It seems like somew

RE: On-the-fly UI construction

2006-03-30 Thread Mike Henderson
Hi, I'd be interested in seeing if a T4 version of DynamicBlock helps: http://www.behindthesite.com/blog/C1931765677/E20060309215538/index.html It's a complete rewrite from the T3 version and should address Howard's concerns. It actually generates the page containing the requested compon

RE: On-the-fly UI construction

2006-03-30 Thread James Carman
look them up by name (page name and idPath actually). Is this what you're doing? -Original Message- From: Mark Stang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 1:04 PM To: Tapestry users; Tapestry users Subject: RE: On-the-fly UI construction Our entire application is

RE: On-the-fly UI construction

2006-03-30 Thread Mark Stang
what to display and then renders it. So, at any point in time any component we want to draw is available. regards, Mark -Original Message- From: Paul Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu 3/30/2006 12:32 AM To: Tapestry users Subject: Re: On-the-fly UI construction On 30 M

Re: On-the-fly UI construction

2006-03-30 Thread Mike . Barber
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/29/2006 11:32 PM Please respond to "Tapestry users" To "Tapestry users" cc Subject Re: On-the-fly UI construction On 30 Mar 2006, at 01:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Here is a posting by Robert Zeigler from Decemeber that says it all

Re: On-the-fly UI construction

2006-03-29 Thread Paul Russell
On 30 Mar 2006, at 01:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is a posting by Robert Zeigler from Decemeber that says it all (I hope it's considered polite to quote at length). It's seems Tap3- centric, but probably applies to Tap4 as well. Ah ha! (and thanks for bending the rules and 'quoting at

Re: On-the-fly UI construction

2006-03-29 Thread Kris Rasmussen
, March 29, 2006 4:35:51 PM Subject: Re: On-the-fly UI construction This topic has been discussed many times here, although I think you are taking it to a deeper level--especially if you implement your own Page Loader. Here is a posting by Robert Zeigler from Decemeber that says it all (I hope

Re: On-the-fly UI construction

2006-03-29 Thread Mike . Barber
ey serve only as component holders. Voila. Static structures, but dynamic content, and no if's required. Robert Paul Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 03/29/2006 03:35 PM Please respond to "Tapestry users" To Tapestry users cc Subject On-the-fly UI construction Hi

Re: On-the-fly UI construction

2006-03-29 Thread Scott Russell
Hi Paul, I briefly looked into page loading a few weeks ago when I looked into creating a 'hot' page loader (one that would reload the page only if it detected that the template or xml file timestamp had changed) to provide JSP style reloading in a live webapp, without the performance penalty o

On-the-fly UI construction

2006-03-29 Thread Paul Russell
Hi Guys, I've been a silent user of Tapestry off and on since version 4.0 was late-alpha/early-beta. That doesn't sound long, but it's been long enough for me to learn a fair bit about the framework, and to be very impressed with it. The reason I got /into/ tapestry in the first place was