Re: [Talk-it] "CC-BY" and "CC-BY-IT" licences

BTW: the use of the cc-by 2.5 Italian version was a common behaviour in Italy between 2010 and 2011 The version 2.5 doesn't mention the "sui generis rights" (aka database rights) This opened also a discussion more or less on the same reason for the passage in OpenStreeMap to cc-by-sa to odbl. Nobod

Re: [Talk-it] "CC-BY" and "CC-BY-IT" licences

On 01/09/2017 16:11, Andrea Musuruane wrote: They pointed to a summary of the CC-BY 2.5 license written in Italian. AFAIK this doesn't mean anything. The original English CC-BY 2.5 written in English still applies. Thanks everyone - that helps a lot. Best Regards, Andy ___

Re: [Talk-it] "CC-BY" and "CC-BY-IT" licences

Hi, On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Andy Townsend wrote: > Hello Italian mappers, > > The DWG has recently been asked about some data imported into OSM under a > "CC-BY-IT" licence. The relevant changeset discussion, where "CC-BY-IT" > was first mentioned, is http://www.openstreetmap.org/chang

Re: [Talk-it] "CC-BY" and "CC-BY-IT" licences

Il 01/09/2017 15:02, Maurizio Napolitano ha scritto: I'm complete agree with the observation made by Stefano. I think that the "mapper" confused the IODL 2.0 with the CC-BY The IODL 2.0 sounds like the CC-BY with a short attention to the "sui generis right" (only be

Re: [Talk-it] "CC-BY" and "CC-BY-IT" licences

I'm complete agree with the observation made by Stefano. I think that the "mapper" confused the IODL 2.0 with the CC-BY The IODL 2.0 sounds like the CC-BY with a short attention to the "sui generis right" (only because, in the text, you can read "database" instead "work") The restrictions are: - i

Re: [Talk-it] "CC-BY" and "CC-BY-IT" licences

AFAIK "CC-BY-IT" does not exists, many italian open data are licensed with IODL ( http://www.formez.it/iodl/ ) which explicitly permits import in ODBL databases. By the way in the url linked in the import ( https://geoportale.comune.milano.it/ATOM/SIT/Fontanelle/Fontanelle_Dataset_1.xml ) states