Hi Giorgio,
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 2:10 PM, Giorgio Limonta <
giorgio.limont...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I checked again, I hope it's better now .
>
> Many thanks again for your help!!
>
It seems fine to me now! :-)
Bye,
Andrea
___
Talk-it mailing list
T
Hi Andrea,
2018-02-22 14:41 GMT+01:00 Andrea Musuruane :
> It's likely because one of the two building parts must be a multi polygon.
>
>>
> It is better but I still see some issues:
> * A bell tower has one tag "man_made:part=tower" which is not documented.
> You should use two building:part tag
Hi Giorgio,
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Giorgio Limonta <
giorgio.limont...@gmail.com> wrote:
> * A bell tower has one tag "man_made:part=tower" which is not documented.
>> You should use two building:part tags.
>
> * You should also add building=yes to bell towers.
>
>
> done thanks
>
You
Hi Andrea,
* A bell tower has one tag "man_made:part=tower" which is not documented.
> You should use two building:part tags.
* You should also add building=yes to bell towers.
done thanks
* There is one building with only one building:part=residential tag (there
> should be more than one).
>
Hi!
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:57 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 22. Feb 2018, at 14:41, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> >
> > * You should also add building=yes to bell towers.
>
>
> I would suggest building=bell_tower
>
>
Actually in the wiki there is written to add
sent from a phone
> On 22. Feb 2018, at 14:41, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>
> * You should also add building=yes to bell towers.
I would suggest building=bell_tower
Cheers,
Martin
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.op
Hi Giorgio,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 3:44 PM, Giorgio Limonta <
giorgio.limont...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why did you avoid "not residential" buildings?
>
> For example, the following building is still not correctly mapped (and it
>> is not the only one):
>> https://postimg.org/image/p3b4wmsgz/
>
>
>
Hi Andrea,
There is still an historic=monument.
Sorry, done.
If I'm not mistaken, the proposal is to map an "oratorio" in the following
> way:
> amenity=community_centre
> community_centre=parish_hall
> denomination=catholic
> religion=christian
Ok I fixed
The problem is that without a tag
Hi Giorgio,
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 6:13 PM, Giorgio Limonta <
giorgio.limont...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You wrongly tagged history=memorial features as historic=monument.
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:historic%3Dmonument
>>
>
There is still an historic=monument.
> Please look at this
Hi Alessandro,
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 7:25 PM, Alessandro wrote:
> Il 11/02/2018 20:34, Andrea Musuruane ha scritto:
>
> ..
>> BTW, no church has got a name tag. Will you add them? When?
>>
>>
>>
> Hi,
> sorry, but I really don't see the point in not having the churches named.
> Is it
Il 11/02/2018 20:34, Andrea Musuruane ha scritto:
..
BTW, no church has got a name tag. Will you add them? When?
Hi,
sorry, but I really don't see the point in not having the churches
named. Is it mandatory in a import procedure?
It's ok going into all the details, but sometimes I
Hi Andrea,
> Hi Giorgio,
> I fixed some more spelling errors and other mistakes on the wiki page.
> Please review them.
Many thanks
Summarizing, OSM is authorized to derive works from the "Carta Tecnica
> Comunale" and to distribute them under the ODbL but you can't distribute
> the source
Hi Giorgio,
I fixed some more spelling errors and other mistakes on the wiki page.
Please review them.
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:04 PM, Giorgio Limonta <
giorgio.limont...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am waiting clarification but I belive this doesn't stop the import (I
> hope)
>
Summarizing, OSM
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:49 PM, Andrea Musuruane
wrote:
Hi Andrea,
I understand this is your first import (and I definitely hope it's not your
> last!). It's really difficult to get things right the first time. Imports
> are not easy tasks - there are so much things to pay attention to.
> I fin
14 matches
Mail list logo
