Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 51, Issue 27

Hi OpenSeaMap! I want to support what Pieren is saying Having started to tag lakes and harbors all around Switzerland, I realized that: 1. The OpenSeaMap tags and OSM tags do not match. 2. Most of the tags are not rendered. This situation is a pity. I do not want to live in two different wor

[Tagging] How to map holiday flats? New tag "tourism=holiday_flat" or extend existing "tourism=chalet"

Dear all, Mapping holiday flats is interesting, since if I look for a holiday flat at a location that interests me, I can spot available flats e.g. close to the beach or the village etc. and access directly to the contact information. Or, currently there are tags for all kind of accommodation:

Re: [Tagging] How to map holiday flats? New tag "tourism=holiday_flat" or extend existing "tourism=chalet"

Dear Dave, Steve, Philip Thank you very much for your replies. If I understand correctly, you all advocate to use "apartment" instead of "flat". As being non-native English, I can not really judge on this (I just learned "flat" in school, so ... at may age :-) ), so no problem for me to change

[Tagging] feature Proposal - RFC 2 - tourism = apartment

, nounours77 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - All You Can Eat

If you really think the information about the pricing scheme is relevant (which I don't), why not make a general tag: Pricing_scheme=all_you_can_eat Pricing_scheme=daily_menu greetings, nounours77 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org

[Tagging] Architectural Monuments - ideas?

it's very likely to be among the architectural_monuments There is as well "man_made" ... but I do not think this fits into a city. Thank you for your thoughts! nounours77 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.o

Re: [Tagging] Architectural Monuments - ideas?

ably already there), and then set the wikipedia tag to the building? But would that no remove information, since there are so many wikipedia-tags, how can I get a map of all architectural monuments in a city? nounours77 [1] http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wildt’sches_Haus [2] http://de.wikipedia.org/

[Tagging] Proposal: tourism=apartment: voting started

The number of apartments present in the building can be specified with the tag "number", default being 1. So therefore I opened the proposal https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/apartment for voting. Thanks in advance for participating. greetings, nounours77 _

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - amenity=boat_sharing

Dear all, In analogy to "amenity=car_sharing", I would like to suggest a tag for the growing (sail)boat-sharing community. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boat_sharing Many thanks for your comments! nounours77 _

Re: [Tagging] Hot springs

on OSM, so I can go and jump in if I happen to drive by, it is so relaxing!!! cheers, nounours77 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - amenity=boat_sharing

r_rental, which is well accepted. Any opinions? thanks, nounours77 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - amenity=Boat_sharing

Dear all, the proposal is now open for voting. https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boat_sharing The idea is to create a tag for boat sharing communities, just in analogy of the existing and well accepted tag "amenity=car_sharing". Thank you very much for voting.

[Tagging] Feature proposal: tourism=apartment: approved

Dear all, the proposal reached the end of the voting period. There were 10 Yes and 0 No. I consider therefore the proposal to be accepted. Thank you all for your comments and the support for the proposal Nounours77 ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - amenity=Boat_sharing

Dear André, >> >> the proposal is now open for voting. >> >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boat_sharing > BTW, slightly off topic, I still have no clean solution for > fr:covoiturage, which is translated to en:car_sharing by Nominatim. Agree, car_sharing is not a good

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting Extended - amenity=boat_sharing

same structure for boats as for cars. To indicate where you can pick up a shared boat you reserved. I expect that service providers will mostly deliver this information, but we should agree on the format. Thanks for voting. Nounours77 ___ Tagging

[Tagging] What is OSM: a base layer for individual maps, or a fully featured geobased information system?

Thanks for your comments, and yes, I reopened the boat_sharing proposal for voting, just in case somebody wants to support me!!! Have a nice week-end, Nounours77 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boat_sharing https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_feature

[Tagging] Post-voting-clean-up: help needed.

, since both of them seem not to be maintained by hand. But it does not. I used the templates etc. and tried to do as the other pages - but they are listed and mine not. I search a lot, but could not find a clue??? Am I overseeing something obvious??? Thanks for help! nou

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Wikidata

Very interesting and important discussion. Are you all aware of that one of the main subjects of the next wikimedia hackthon in May in Zurich is about this? Maybe it is interesting to discuss this subject in Zurich? Like send the worked proposal to the people there or something?? nounours77

[Tagging] Voting ended: amenity=boat_sharing

I will work together with André and others interested on this. Thanks again and have an nice evening. nounours77 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/boat_sharing https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/generic_service_object_model

Re: [Tagging] Offices of Bike Sharing services

would specifiy the "action-tags": sharing, renting, selling, and the sub-tags: no sub-tag = physical location/pick-up place ... sub-tag: office: location of the sharing agency etc.). What do you think? nounours77 ___ Tagging mail

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] boules=petanque vs. type=petanque

> >> Much better to standardise on the "chaining" approach i.e. "boules=*" > > > > this was also discussed on talk-it (and I think talk-de) in the past: > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2013-October/038240.html > > the wiki advocates for boules=* on the tag page: > http://w

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] boules=petanque vs. type=petanque

Am 15.05.2014 um 14:00 schrieb tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org: > Indeed this is what you can also find reflected in the current usage: > 6 291 > *sport* > *bowls* > boules=bowls -> 0 So should w

Re: [Tagging] Bitcoin ATM (amenity=atm | currency:XBT=yes)

Janko wrote: > We only have to insist on the tag cash_out=no, and then tell renderers to > not render amenity=atm+cash_out=no. Sorry Janko, this is pure no-sense. Should we tag flat areas as "natural=peak" "ele=0" and then tell the renderer not to render it as a mountain? Should we tag deserts

Re: [Tagging] man_made=pipeline - is onewayness implied?

Dear Bryan, > Better use an own tag like flow_direction=forward/backward/both/none or > similar. This way we will cover all three cases mentioned below. +1 Making "oneway=yes" as a default and make it automatically into the direction of flow is not a good solution: * someone might not know the

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Port and terminals

Dear Stefano, > Accepting the tag landuse=port would improve the detailed tagging of port > areas, for example to tell apart container terminals (easily > distinguishable from satellite imagery) from passenger terminals and so on. Thank you very much for your good strucutured and very detailed