2010/12/16 Pieren :
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:54 PM, Simone Saviolo
> wrote:
>
> Why "landuse=depot" ? I don't like to use amenity for "everything" but it's
> very closed to the already existing amenity=parking which is not
> "landuse=par
2010/12/17 Pieren :
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Simone Saviolo
> wrote:
>>
>> We proposed the use of "landuse" because it really seems that simple:
>> "what is the land used for?" "to deposit things, such as vehicles or
>> goods, an
2011/1/6 Steve Bennett
> Putting in place a serious process for tag migration will be difficult. I
> suggest that a first step will be definition of an actual schema, with
> version number. For example, define an actual list of several hundred tags,
> with semantics, that correspond to "OSM core
2011/1/6 Ralf Kleineisel
> On 01/06/2011 06:00 PM, Peter Wendorff wrote:
>
> > What beside of this - I fear, stupid - "certification" is the benefit
> > for a hiking map in supporting e.g. maxspeed of motorways as part of the
> > OSM core being the decision basis to get the certification?
> >
> >
2011/1/6 Ralf Kleineisel
> Remember, the goal of OSM is a FREE map, not one with a lot of rules and
> restrictions. There are enough restricted maps out there.
>
Let me express another comment on this. OSM's map is FREE in the sense that
it is FREELY USABLE and DISTRIBUTABLE. You can do what you
2011/1/6 Peter Wendorff
> Hi Simone.
> I agree that some definition of "core features" would be useful.
> I think I wrote that in my last mail here, too.
>
> I simply don't see the benefit of a certificate on application side.
>
It's not an advantage "on the application side" in itself; it's mo
2011/1/6 Ulf Lamping
> Am 06.01.2011 23:06, schrieb Simone Saviolo:
>
>> ... but in fact the map is not reliably usable.
>>
>
> Fine, if you think OSM is working unreliably - just go on and start your
> own reliable project :-)
>
> If you set up something l
2011/1/21 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> By looking at the wiki and taginfo, as well as some data as Cardiff /
> Wales, it doesn't seem clear which way capitals should be tagged / are
> currently tagged.
> There is proposals to use capital=yes together with admin_level on a
> node, there is the idea to ta
2011/1/21
> I was a little surprised by this, until I looked up the definition of
> capital given in Wikipedia (primary city, as opposed to seat of government).
> In American usage, the capital of a nation or sub-national region is its
> seat of government, whether or not that is the primary ci
2011/2/16 Nathan Edgars II
> On 2/15/2011 10:22 PM, Andrew Errington wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have noticed inconsistencies and discrepancies in motorway names here in
>> Korea. I can fix this because I have photographed the roadsigns which
>> give
>> the correct names, however, the motorway ways
2011/2/17 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> > A slight OT: is there some agreed decision on how to solve conflicts in
> tags
> > between a relation and its elements?
>
> Yes, correct the wrong one with local knowledge ;-).
>
Ja, denn die Welt ist perfekt ;-)
I mean, if the relation says "name=Foo" and the
2011/2/21 Richard Welty
> On 2/21/11 9:10 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>> On 02/20/2011 08:57 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/20/11 8:51 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>>
On 02/19/2011 08:08 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> Don't we want to break existing consumers if they might route peop
2011/3/17 Peter Wendorff
> Hi.
> I'm from Germany, and therefore not argumenting with the English language,
> but "footway" is a more general term as distinct ways for people moving by
> foot are "footways", too.
> Ways along or part of a street with main purpose of often motorized
> vehicles - a
2011/3/25 David Paleino
> No, it's up to YOU, as a developer, to support basic OSM things.
> "Relations" are an OSM primitive, and to be considered the official editor,
> since you're being hosted on osm.org, you MUST implement them. That's
> IMHO,
> obviously.
I remember the mob yelling the l
2011/3/25 Richard Fairhurst
> David Paleino wrote:
> > No, it's up to YOU, as a developer, to support basic OSM things.
> > "Relations" are an OSM primitive, and to be considered the official
> > editor, since you're being hosted on osm.org, you MUST implement them.
> > That's IMHO, obviously.
>
2011/4/8 Jo
> In Ghent (Belgium) I find the following in the name tags:
>
> Henri Farmanstraat ((Luchthavenpionier, 1874-1958))
> Vincent Evrardlaan ((Oud burgemeester van Gentbrugge, 1896-1995))
> Guido Gezelle straat ((Dichter, 1830-1899))
>
> Interesting information, but technically not really
2011/4/28 Richard Welty
> On 4/27/11 8:47 PM, John Smith wrote:
>
>>
>> If people can tag trees, surely things of historical significants
>> deserve to be allowed in OSM as well.
>>
> identifiable, physical objects that exist today, sure.
>
> the phase maps i want to do for the battle of antietam
201 - 217 of 217 matches
Mail list logo
