[Tagging] Suggestions for the correct tagging of Field borders

2014-06-13 Thread Simon Wüllhorst
smaller seperations of farmland-areas (an own farmland-area for every farmland and not a farmland-area for a whole region). In my opinion the inroduciton of a Filed Border tag would support these idea, too. Greetings from Germany (sorry for my bad english) descilla/Simon Wüllhorst

Re: [Tagging] Suggestions for the correct tagging of Field borders

2014-06-29 Thread Simon Wüllhorst
; * how to handle tracks between fields ? There are some tracks which move > from year to year > > All together I think the field margin can be tagged already using > landcover=*, but if you want to tag it explicit you could think about a > complete new tag like field_margin=yes or far

Re: [Tagging] Suggestions for the correct tagging of Field borders

2014-07-05 Thread Simon Wüllhorst
, the user should be free to decide the best option by himself. So what is the next step for me? How can I announce this value? Is a proposal-page in the wiki needed? Greetings Simon/descilla 2014-06-29 21:30 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > > > Il giorno 29/giu/2014, alle ore

Re: [Tagging] Suggestions for the correct tagging of Field borders

2014-07-12 Thread Simon Wüllhorst
-07-05 19:00 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > > > Am 05/lug/2014 um 11:08 schrieb Simon Wüllhorst < > m...@simon-wuellhorst.de>: > > > > Is a proposal-page in the wiki needed? > > > > It is Not strictly needed (you can use the tag straight away),

Re: [Tagging] About new landuses and superiority of cascading tag schemes

2014-07-26 Thread Simon Wüllhorst
I propose to reduce inventing new landuses and start making subcategories whenewer possible. Recently I encountered landuse=plant_nursery, landuse=salt_pond, landuse=greenhouse_horticulture and landuse=mine. I think that all of them are overly specific and should be tagged as subcategories of mo