On 16.08.2023 06:33, Kashish via Tagging wrote:
1. width:start=*/width:end=*, optionally with width=* for the minimum width of
the street, and with a word of warning about the results of editors splitting
ways.
Would you require in these cases that the road width is changing exactly
linearly
Hi everyone.
There’s an on-going discussion in the Norway category on how to tag car
barriers. We request your input on the subject. A detailed explanation
of the issue and the discussion so far is here:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/request-for-help-in-determining-how-to-tag-car-barr
Generally speaking, how do we reconcile these two?
bicycle=yes
highway=steps
What is a data consumer supposed to infer from this as opposed to just
highway=steps? As long as foot=designated, aren't cyclists always
allowed to get off the bike and push/carry it? And wouldn't they have to
when t
1) true, but wouldn't that by default be all steps unless otherwise
noted? I guess in this case it's assumed that the steps inherit their
implicit access from bridleway, so that might be different from the
general case...?
2) a noble cause, but again I would think that excluding bicycle=no from
I would re-iterate Martin's assertion.
In Norway, we tag bicycle=designated/foot=designated when there is a
traffic sign for cycleway/footway/combined. Implicit in this logic is
that the consequence of the traffic sign is a different legal status
compared to an unsigned road. A route sign is n
Hi.
In Norway, roads are owned by the state, a county, a municipality, or a
private entity. Ownership of the road implies general responsibility for
maintenance and authority over signage and usage. I assume most
countries divide road ownership and authority in a similar way.
As an example o
09:04, Jens Glad Balchen via Tagging
wrote:
I couldn't find an official way to capture this information in OSM.
Is there one?
you could use the operator tag (although it doesn’t relate to ownership, it is
about the entity in charge of maintenance, and there could be several different
ent
13 at 08:58 +0200, Jens Glad Balchen via Tagging wrote:
The status quo for "car" roads in Norway seems to be that state roads
are highway=motorway or highway=trunk, county roads are
highway=primary
or highway=secondary, and municipal roads are highway=tertiary and so
on.
For cycleways and
On 13 Apr 2023, at 09:04, Jens Glad Balchen via Tagging
wrote:
I couldn't find an official way to capture this information in OSM.
Is there one?
you could use the operator tag (although it doesn’t relate to
ownership, it is about the entity in charge of maintenance, and
there could be s
ator at some point in the future again diverges from the
owner (like with the county roads), we can put that in operator.
Sound good?
Jens
On 13.04.2023 12:42, Greg Troxel wrote:
Jens Glad Balchen via Tagging writes:
That does seem to capture it when used on roads. I see it's mostly
u
On 14.04.2023 00:30, stevea wrote:
A search might be able to discern "in which" jurisdiction(s) a road is
found, much like a geocoder works with a minimal amount of data
"scattered around" (geographically) enough to determine "close enough
to a node to be associated with it" (as a place, for ex
On 14.04.2023 09:13, Peter Neale wrote:
Well, to me, "type of ownership" suggests values such as "freehold";
"leasehold"; "rented", which I _don't_ think is what is intended.
I agree that "type of" is ambiguous, but the same applies to
"ownership". Neither is fully understood by just reading
On 14.04.2023 10:13, Volker Schmidt wrote:
Ownership is not relevant if you think in terms of fixmystreet..
Just two extreme examples.
* The Italian Motorway network is owned by the Italian via a
state-majority public company, and operated by several different
private or state-owned co
On 16.04.2023 16:55, Greg Troxel wrote:
If we look at this from a data perspective, the most important
information for us to capture /today/ is which public entity type owns
the road and put this in the ownership tag. The specific entity can be
derived geographically with probably 100% accuracy.
On 16.04.2023 21:40, stevea wrote:
Isn't it a general assumption for everything that the owner is the operator by default?
I'm not saying "isn't it always true", but isn't that generally the assumption
if no other information is presented?
An obviously dangerous slope to slip down here and may
15 matches
Mail list logo
