[Tagging] shop for baby strollers only

Should I tag a shop, where I can buy a baby strollers (and only strollers, nothing more) as shop=baby_goods ? Or is it better to use shop=stroller ? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop%3Dbaby_goods ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap

Re: [Tagging] shop for baby strollers only

consumers that don't know > about stroller shops. > > -- Matthijs > > On 4 Apr 2014 10:50, "André Riedel" wrote: >> >> Should I tag a shop, where I can buy a baby strollers (and only >> strollers, nothing more) a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - entrance=*

2011/10/13 Erik Johansson : > Further I would like to propose railway=subway_entrance => > entrance=public_transport, since it's probably interesting to have on > bus/boat/rail terminals as well, now this is a bit more tricky since > it already renders. As the creator of the proposal I do not like

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - entrance=*

2011/10/14 Erik Johansson : > If can't even tag *entrances* to a subway with this tag I see little > use for it. Could either of you perhaps expand a bit  about what you > mean. You can tag the entrance of a train or subway station as entrance=yes/main BUT only together with a correspondending bui

[Tagging] difference between park and garden

I have a question according to the garden proposal . What is the difference between a public garden and a park? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garden http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Park Ciao André ___

Re: [Tagging] What is this called?

See the talk page of new barriers: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/New_barrier_types#other_new_values espacially: http://www.maydencroftrural.com/project-details/59/101/12417/Services/Access-control/Horse-hops-horse-stiles.htm (UK) I would prefer "barrier=horse_stiles".

Re: [Tagging] What is this called?

2010/6/10 Steve Bennett : >> I would prefer "barrier=horse_stiles". > > I think singular: "barrier=horse_stile". There's definitely very > little google support for "horse hops". > > All in favour of barrier=horse_stile? +1 2010/6/9 John Smith : > http://townandcountryfences.com.au/uploads/images/

Re: [Tagging] Zone 30 (maxspeed)

2010/7/6 Sebastian Klein : > -- --- > 944    zone:maxspeed=DE:30 > 631    zone:traffic=DE:30 > 516    source:maxspeed=traffic_zone > 433    source:maxspeed=DE:zone30 > 152    zone:speed=30 > 140    maxspeed:zone=yes >  40    source:maxspeed=zone30 2182 maxspeed:note=* 29maxspeed:reason=zone

Re: [Tagging] Proposal: Energy generator power types

2010/8/16 Tom Chance : > Basically I have deprecated "power_type=photovoltaic" and > "power_type=solar-thermal", which combine two bits of information (source of > energy, and type of energy generated). This also allows for adequate tagging > of generators that produce more than one type of energy

Re: [Tagging] Proposal: Energy generator power types

2010/8/17 Tom Chance : > Just to help summarise, with these proposals we end up with: > > power=generator (the starting point) Please do not mix the "power"-tag for generating electricity with other sources of energy like steam, vacuum, heat and so on. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:power

Re: [Tagging] Dancing school

2010/8/18 Vincent Pottier : > On 18/08/2010 01:17, John Smith wrote: >> >> On 18 August 2010 08:25, Andreas Labres  wrote: >> >>> >>> I can't follow your argument here. A dancing school (or is ist called >>> dance >>> school? in which part of the English world?) is an amenity, is it not? >>> >> >>

Re: [Tagging] Another classification needed for minor urban/suburban collectors?

On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, Nathan Edgars II wrote: > Making the former secondary would seemingly overload the map with > secondaries. But as it is, there are two distinct classes of road > marked as tertiary, and it's not always clear which connect between > neighborhoods and which serve as main roads in

Re: [Tagging] Another classification needed for minor urban/suburban collectors?

2010/8/23 Nathan Edgars II : > highway=unclassified in my experience is essentially > highway=residential outside a residential area. Not exactly. An 'unclassified' is a road to connect some neighborhoods or towns. It should be a connection between roads of a higher class (tertiary, secondary) but

Re: [Tagging] Another classification needed for minor urban/suburban collectors?

2010/8/23 Pieren : > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Nathan Edgars II > wrote: >> >> If that's so, why do we have residential at all? Why not just use >> unclassified? > > 'residential' was originaly created for residential areas only. But many > contributors use it extensively for all minor urb

Re: [Tagging] craft= Proposal

2010/8/24 Peter Körner : > Why does the list of proposed values for craft= then contain butcher and > bakery? I don't see them as a craft but I hesitate to remove them just > because of a feeling that's not based on a well formed definition. Probably because some bakeries or butchers work and sell

Re: [Tagging] RFC: generator:* (for power=generator features)

2010/8/26 Tom Chance : > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/generator_rationalisation > The aim is to provide a flexible framework to encompass: > > This should allow us to distinguish between a solar photovoltaic panel > producing electricity and a solar thermal panel producing h

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

2010/9/3 Tom Chance : > Please vote on my proposal: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/generator_rationalisation > > It has gone through several weeks of discussion on this list and on the > wiki. I have made significant changes to the proposal to make it as flexible > as seem

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Homeless Shelter

See too: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Residential_home http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dnursing_home http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/social_facility 2010/9/4 John Smith : > I'll try to dig up the thread, however someone had come up with

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

2010/9/6 Tom Chance : > On 4 September 2010 15:11, André Riedel wrote: >> >> There are still some mismatches between source and method. >> >> e.g. generator:source=nuclear, generator:methode=fission >> A nuclear fission do not creates electricity it only crea

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

2010/9/6 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer : > 2010/9/6 André Riedel : >> Fission power plants could use 'clean' uranium 238 or (with a special >> license) a plutonium uranium mixture (MOX) or Thorium MOX. > > does this on the other hand suggest I don't need a special licens

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

2010/9/6 Tom Chance : > If you can do so without requiring that mappers happy with > generator:method=gasification be forced to instead enter a more complicated > mixture of tags to describe those precise processes, then I wouldn't argue > against your proposal. It wouldn't interest me, but it also

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - power generator rationalisation

2010/9/8 Tom Chance : >> But all these values of 'generator:method' works only very well for >> these combustion or fission generators. :-( All water based generators >> include their method in its 'generator:source'. > > They aren't included in the generator:source. I have considered them to be >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - rental

2010/9/16 Ulf Lamping : > Am 16.09.2010 15:19, schrieb Jonas Stein: >> >> Are there tags missing? >> Any other issues? >> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/rental > > Yes, it's simply a bad idea. > > E.g. a car rental station is very different from a ski rental station. It > l

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - rental

2010/9/16 Ulf Lamping : > Well, Sixt will very rarely sell you a car, but a ski rental station very > often will also sell you ski if you like. > > I'm not saying that the rental tag is generally a bad idea (I've recently > added this to JOSM presets to indicate rental services for shop=motorcycle)

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - rental

2010/9/17 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer : > 2010/9/17 Ulf Lamping : >>> I won't use shop or rental with yes/no because it is against the >>> convention. >> >> I don't know which convention you are talking about, as there is none today >> in that regard. > > > there is the convention for shop: > shop= > > yes

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - rental

2010/9/17 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer : > 2010/9/17 John F. Eldredge : >> At a guess, the combination of amenity=fuel and shop=yes means that there is >> a retail shop in addition to fuel sales.  This most likely is what Americans >> call a convenience store.  Typically, most of the inventory will be bee

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - rental

2010/9/17 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer : > 2010/9/17 John F. Eldredge : >> At a guess, the combination of amenity=fuel and shop=yes means that there is >> a retail shop in addition to fuel sales.  This most likely is what Americans >> call a convenience store.  Typically, most of the inventory will be bee

Re: [Tagging] shop=wedding_office [Was: New tag value: shop=wedding]

2010/9/28 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer : > yes, probably a specific tag would be suitable: shop=wedding_dresses > or shop=wedding_clothes. > Because nobody who looks for casual clothing would want to find a > specialized wedding shop, and usually who looks for a wedding shop > would want to exclude "normal"

Re: [Tagging] new Key proposal: landcover

2010/10/7 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer : > I know we already talked about this, but actually no actions followed ;-) > > What is the current feeling for a new key "landcover"? Could resolve > many issues, as often landuse is a mixture of actual "use" and > "coverage". > Seems like there is already landcover

Re: [Tagging] How to tag a (main) entrance to a large feature?

2010/11/18 Nathan Edgars II : > Features such as parks may cover a large area, and if the park is > drawn as a polygon, routing software will likely choose the centroid. > The nearest point on public roads to the centroid may however not be > the actual entrance to the park. For example, go to > ht