[Tagging] Proposal to Change Road Classification, Road Surface, Road Condition, and Add Number of Lanes

nk and the African Development Bank on roads and highways in more than 50 countries, but mostly in Sub-Saharan Africa, South America, South Asia, East Asia and the Pacific, and Eastern Europe. Alberto Nogales 202-257-8726 A. FUNCTIONAL ROAD CLASSIFICATION for "Motor Vehicles": Rur

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (amenity=kennel)

___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (amenity=kennel)

Here the link to the proposal: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kennel Thank you for any comment. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] amenity=kennel

iling list? Any suggestion from native speakers is welcome. Alberto Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:00:19 +0200 From: Martin Vonwald To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (amenity=kennel) Message-ID: Cont

[Tagging] amenity=kennel

lter" to "animal=shelter" because according to wiki "amenities are an assortment of community facilities" and an animal shelter is one of them. On the other hand the key "animal" is not defined on the wiki and according to taginfo it's often used to indicate

[Tagging] animal shelter

rs that take lost animals but they have also some boxes to take pets from people who go on holiday. If we are looking for a general tag, we have to find one that can fit in all the world. The distinction you say can be done with additional tags, like boarding=

[Tagging] amenity=kennel to amenity=animal_shelter

't know neither the species kept in a shelter, you just tag it with "amenity=animal_shelter". Is it too complicated? Or maybe it would be better for a stray and boarding kennel to tag it with "amenity=animal_shelter" and "animal_shelter:dog=stray;boarding "? Which solution would be correctly interpreted by route planning software? Alberto ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (amenity=animal_shelter)

I've changed the proposal amenity=kennel to amenity=animal_shelter. I ask your help to refine it. See the related discussion page. Thanks a lot. Alberto ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/lis

[Tagging] Animal_shelter, multiple semicolon separated values?

Hi everybody, what do you think about using multiple comma separated values in a key (see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator)? In particular about the new proposal "amenity=animal_shelter". Suppose we need

Re: [Tagging] Animal_shelter, multiple semicolon separated

example you can describe a facility that recover stray dogs and gives them in adoption while it offers boarding for dogs and cats. Or a facility that recovers any type of wounded animals, including stray dogs, then it gives dogs and cats in adoption while rehabilitates and releases wild animals. Albe

Re: [Tagging] Animal_shelter, multiple semicolon separated

vice (e.g. "amenity=veterinary" + "animal_boarding=cat;dog"). In the case of a boarding kennel it would be "amenity=animal_boarding" + "animal_boarding=dog" Alberto ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Animal_shelter and animal_boarding

comments here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Animal_shelter so we can see all of them together. Thank you Alberto ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Animal shelters and animal boarding facilities

n go to the voting phase. Thank you Alberto (Viking81) ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Animal shelters and animal boarding facilities

_facil ities Thank you Alberto (Viking81) ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Animal shelters and animal boarding facilities

Because we found a good compromise in the definition and nobody demands for changes any more, I put the proposal forward for voting: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Animal_shelters_and_animal_boarding_facil ities Thank you Alberto (Viking81

Re: [Tagging] How to tag: Legally separated ways

can do in inkscape :). >Best Regards Tobias J I like it, but you must convert it into .png before you can overwrite the existing file. Alberto ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] How to tag: Legally separated ways

clear where the divider is placed. Cheers Alberto (Viking81) ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] How to tag: Legally separated ways

the very few. I can't see how the service can be "compromised". We can anyway refine and use divider proposal: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Divider Cheers Alberto ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Status of building=stable

ks like , >but is used as stable >I assume, that the majority of who used building=stable in the past >meant "it is used as a stable". >Better? >Martin +1. Since this tag is already used, I think that you should also create a page in active map featu

Re: [Tagging] How to tag: Legally separated ways (2nd Part)

on how long section 5 is and how harsh the split is. +1 I agree with Simone and Martin K. Regards Alberto ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Lane dividers

lication has a problem. I think that tagging the effect is more important than the actual behavior of the sign. If you are in an unknown country, what would you like from your GPS, that it gives you correct navigation instructions or correct rendering? The rendering can be adjusted country by cou

Re: [Tagging] Places & admin boundaries

polygon with a new tag. We created a new proposal for urban area tagging [2]: any advice is appreciated. [1] http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Tag-place-ridondanti-td5727924.html#a5729470 [2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Urban_settlements Cheers Alber

[Tagging] R: agglom?ration

>How do we tag agglom?rations? What's about the proposal for urban settlements? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Urban_settlements Alberto ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/

Re: [Tagging] wiki building=hangar

>so the french, italiano and deutch wiki are wrong when it's explain building=hangar is for storing good? >i can modify the french wiki but not all others language >cheers >didier To me they seem wrong compared to the English page. If you agree I can modify the Italian

Re: [Tagging] Amenity=shelter for field shelter?

enstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Danimal_shelter [2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter_type [3] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Animal Alberto - Viking81 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Amenity=shelter for field shelter?

] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter_type [2] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Animal Alberto - Viking81 - Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 13:24:17 +0100 From: Martin Vonwald Makes sense. So we're back to amenity. Something like amenity=shelter + shelter

Re: [Tagging] Amenity=shelter for field shelter?

To Martin Vonwald. I've added field_shelter here [1]. Can you upload a picture for it? I haven't one and I don't want to upload a copyrighted picture. [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:shelter_type Thank you Alberto - Viking81

Re: [Tagging] Amenity=shelter for field shelter?

Thank you for your photo. I've also updated the animal page [1] and I reused your photo. [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Animal Bye Alberto >Thanks for the update of the wiki. I added one of my photos. > >Best regards, >Martin __

Re: [Tagging] fire_hydrant extensions proposal

it isn't published on the signs. Pressure is measured in bar, it is the pressure of the local water network, and in Italy normally this isn't published on the signs too. Alberto - Viking81 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetma

Re: [Tagging] Power generation refinement: power plant model evolution

d without a physical perimeter. Bye Viking81 - Alberto ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Life cycle group

Well, disused:*=* and abandoned:*=* are widely used, you could simply link to their Wiki pages. For construction, we should make a general proposal separated from power refinements, as you suggest. Bye Viking81 - Alberto ___ Tagging mailing list

Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] Crossroad names

>I think we need some clean-up in the traffic signals tags/relations anyway. +1 for single traffic signals tags and for a relations to manage them. Who wants to make a proposal? Viking81 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.o

Re: [Tagging] Power generation refinement: power plant model evolution

> This is where I still don't understand you: why do I need to specify > that >> a feature XXX has the role XXX? Why do I need to specify, that a >> generator is a generator? A substation a substation? A dam a dam? A >> valve a valve? A weir a weir? And so on. >> > > This is just because a role

Re: [Tagging] bicycle-only crossings

I've tagged some cycle crossing drawn as a single node with highway=crossing, foot=no and bicycle=yes. I would not use access=no because it can be misunderstood and routing software could prevent access to the main street. The best solution is to tag intersection node with highway=crossing and draw

Re: [Tagging] bicycle-only crossings

introduce a new tag for single-node cycle crossing? Or a workaround is to draw the crossing as a way, as I've already said. Cheers Alberto - Viking81 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] bicycle-only crossings

>If the cycleways coming to the crossing are tagged as foot=no, then why does the crossing have to be tagged with access tags? > >Janko If the cycleway is drawn as a way there is no problem. The problem is only when you tag the crossing node and you don't draw the cyc

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (amenity=animal_breeding)

p://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Danimal_boarding> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Danimal_boarding Cheers Viking81 - Alberto ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (highway=bicyle_crossing) (Alberto)

As a result of the discussion done here about bicycle-only crossings, I've made a proposal: <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/bicycle_crossing> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/bicycle_crossing Cheers Alberto

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (highway=bicyle_crossing)

ng and document it. Option A) highway=bicycle_crossing Option B) highway=crossing + crossing:access=no + crossing:bicycle=designated Please tell me. Thanks. I would prefer solution A) for simplicity expecially for new mappers. Alberto ___ Tagging mailin

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (highway=bicyle_crossing)

tmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/bicycle_crossing Cheers Alberto ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (highway=bicyle_crossing)

ould assume that an access tag on a node would influence all ways passing through that node. Alberto ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (highway=bicyle_crossing)

tag also pedestrian crossings always as ways... Cheers Alberto ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (amenity=animal_breeding)

Since I didn't receive any opposition so far, next week I would put to the vote this proposal: <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Animal_breeding> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Animal_breeding Use discussion page for any comment. B

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (amenity=animal_breeding)

Because no oppositions or comments have come so far, I request you to vote on this proposal: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Animal_breeding Thank you. Cheers. Alberto - Viking81 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Animal_breeding

I ask you to express your opinion about this proposal, by voting it: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Animal_breeding So if you approve it, I can set up the final page on the wiki. Thank you Alberto - Viking81 ___ Tagging

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Animal_breeding

I remember you that the voting of this proposal is under way and will end on 2013-06-15: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Animal_breeding Please express your opinion, so we can finally end the procedure and create a definitive wiki page. Thank you Alberto

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Animal_breeding

e used, but probably it would be outside the breeding facility itself. However, ok, I will put a link to landuse=meadow or landuse=farmland too. Thank you for your comments. Cheers Alberto ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Animal_breeding

;s now? Do you think I should create a definitive wiki page assuming the proposal is approved, although we have only 11 votes in total? [1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Animal_breeding Thank you Alberto ___ Tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Animal_breeding

ypass voting as Chris suggests. So what should I do, extend voting or not? Alberto > If you end voting now it means that your proposal is rejected for absence of interest (must have at least 15 votes). I think given the low number of opponents you could extend the voting period and try to encour

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Animal_breeding

other tags like taxon=* or species=* or genus=*. Is this a good deal? Alberto ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] incline default unit ?

st be written 0.10, 15% becomes 0.15 and 100% becomes 1.00. If you write 10 without % it does not mean a ratio of 10% but 1000%. Bye Alberto ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] key: starting=yes ??

As a node, the trailhead proposal might fit as well: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/trailhead Alberto From: Martin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com] Sent: venerdì 11 maggio 2018 11:33 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - via_ferrata

>-Original Message- >From: bredy [mailto:bredy...@yahoo.it] >Sent: lunedì 30 settembre 2013 10:37 >To: Tagging@openstreetmap.org >Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - via_ferrata > >For me all path are equiped with some technical equipment are via ferrata, >because with this tag

Re: [Tagging] Pathways with steep vertical slopes, accessed via climbing chains

of thing you are talking about: >http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/via_ferrata Depending on the length of the assisted section, you might also consider this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Safety_measures_on_hiking_trails Alberto

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (nutrition_supplements)

___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 71, Issue 5

one who cares. > Most who don't use the sub tags are probably not correctly suing > path/footway either. > > > > > > > -- Mensaje reenviado -- > From: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> > To: tagging@openstreetmap.org > Cc: > Date: Mon, 3

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (nutrition_supplements)

Hi! Voting process opened for shop =nutrition_supplements https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/nutrition_supplements

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (nutrition_supplements)

Hi again! Voting process is still opened for nutrition_supplements (6 days remaining) amm... somebody knows if i can add a proposed icon yet? if not, how i should do that? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org

[Tagging] RFC - tag: office=adoption_agency

Hi, nice proposal, but i think you can improve some tags, like "The adoption agency proposal would be tagged building=commercial.", i guess is better use "building=civic". Also, you can add the "operator=*" tag (the city, state, any NGO...) Enviado con MailTrack

Re: [Tagging] How might we best map emergency helicopter landing zones?

site? And what about places which have nothing more than a visible and permanent H, but can also be used for purposes different from an emergency (for example, supply materials not transportable by other means)? Furthermore, how do we specify if an emergency=la

Re: [Tagging] How might we best map emergency helicopter landing zones?

encies or for otherwise very infrequent use (for example, to resupply a hut a few times a year) I now understand that the correct tagging should then be emergency=landing_site, maybe with an additional landing_site=marked. Alberto ___

Re: [Tagging] sidewalks

lly. In Italy pedestrians are forbidden to walk on any road, when paths (such as sidewalks) designated for pedestrians are available. They are only allowed to walk on a road when designated paths either don't exist or are some reason unusable (see Codice della strada, paragraph 190, c

Re: [Tagging] Viewpoint indicators (Panoramic tables)

n information=board board_type=viewpoint_map (or viewpoint_indicator or whatever is the best English term for the panoramic table) I wouldn't use map_size=* with information=board. taginfo reports a board_type=view which is used two times, but I think this is not specific enough. Alberto

Re: [Tagging] Towing service?

confused. I'm not sure >how to make this explicitly clear to reduce confusion, which is why >tag names are usually picked to reduce confusion. Maybe the "handycraft" value might hint that the craft key is used in OSM with a broader meaning? Alberto _

Re: [Tagging] maxweight : x tons exept for bus

I somehow doubt that the traffic sign specifies the maximum actual weight, most likely it sets the maximum permitted weight of the vehicle at full load, as specified by the manufacturer. If this is the case, there are examples in the wiki to tell that the limit applies only to certain classes of

Re: [Tagging] maxweight : x tons exept for bus

And have you ever seen a signs which specifies the maximum weight that is permitted on a bridge, also allow some class of vehicles to exceed that weight rating? -Original Message- From: Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> Sent: lunedì 9 settembre 2024 10:51 To: tagging@openstreetmap.org Subject

Re: [Tagging] maxweight : x tons exept for bus

It would help if Marc_marc could post the image of the traffic sign which originated the thread (or the image of an equivalent sign) and tell the country where it is placed. Then a user with local expertise could chime in, and we could decide if the wiki needs clarification. Where I live, two d

Re: [Tagging] maxweight : x tons exept for bus

axweight : x tons exept for bus Le 09.09.24 à 14:43, Alberto Nogaro via Tagging a écrit : > have you ever seen a signs which specifies the maximum weight that is > permitted on a bridge yes, it does exist, that's the reason for my message https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12166259094

Re: [Tagging] cable:ferry

Maybe we might use “reaction” as a value for the ferry:cable <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ferry:cable> key for those specific types of cable ferries, and keep the value “yes” for a generic/unspecified type of cable ferry, and change the wiki definition accordingly. A

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=scramble

s can compute without the need to explicitly map it. Alberto -Original Message- From: Peter Elderson Sent: 15 September 2022 00:04 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - highway=scramble I would probably apply it to the actual scr

Re: [Tagging] Hiking logbooks

Related, but limited to log books placed on summits of peaks, summit:register=yes is documented and in use (904 uses on points). https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:summit:register There are also limited undocumented uses of: register=yes 3 uses register_book 1 use -Original Message---