On 9/9/23 17:31, Volker Schmidt wrote:
Be careful: oneway=* is a legal access tag, only valid for vehicles,
not for pedestrians.
Some pedestrian barriers are 'oneway' .. for example turnstiles at train
stations where the turnstile only allows travel if a card/ticket is
produced. I know of
HI,
I am coming across cases of OSM entered addresses on buildings that are
some kilometers from the nominated address location. These appear to be
'gated communities', 'retirement villages' and possibly other things
that use some official address and thus keep deliveries from going to
the ac
There's https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:delivery_point but I wasn't
convinced by the description
On Sun, 10 Sep 2023, 10:15 Warin, <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> HI,
>
> I am coming across cases of OSM entered addresses on buildings that are
> some kilometers from the nominated address
On Sun, 2023-09-10 at 19:09 +1000, Warin wrote:
> HI,
>
> I am coming across cases of OSM entered addresses on buildings that
> are
> some kilometers from the nominated address location. These appear to
> be
> 'gated communities', 'retirement villages' and possibly other things
> that use some
Volker Schmidt:
Be careful: oneway=* is a legal access tag, only valid for vehicles, not for
pedestrians.
We do have a lot of highway=footway,oneway=yes
at museums, train stations, airports, zoos, etc.
Which is useful for routers.
The wiki does mention vehicles. It may not always be a very l
On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 01:25, Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote:
> Volker Schmidt:
> > Be careful: oneway=* is a legal access tag, only valid for vehicles, not
> for pedestrians.
>
>
> We do have a lot of highway=footway,oneway=yes
>
Also know of suspended Tree Walk walkways e.g.
https://www.openstree
Sep 10, 2023, 23:37 by graemefi...@gmail.com:
>
> On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 01:25, Niels Elgaard Larsen <> elga...@agol.dk> >
> wrote:
>
>> Volker Schmidt:
>> > Be careful: oneway=* is a legal access tag, only valid for vehicles, not
>> for pedestrians.
>>
>>
>> We do have a lot of highwa
The problem is that we frequently have cycleways or food-cycle-ways that
are legally oneway for cyclists, but not for pedestrians. They are tagged
"oneway=yes". I agree we need a oneway tag for pedestrians, but it cannot
be a simple oneway=yes because that is already in use with a different
meaning
On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 16:22, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> The problem is that we frequently have cycleways or food-cycle-ways that
> are legally oneway for cyclists, but not for pedestrians. They are tagged
> "oneway=yes". I agree we need a oneway tag for pedestrians, but it cannot
> be a simple one
