Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hazards

2020-11-27 Thread Niels Elgaard Larsen
På Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:11:25 -0500 I am missing values for: horse riding: https://www.retsinformation.dk/image.aspx?id=196668&img=CX316_8_47.png hazard:animal=horse should only be for wild horses Crossing bicyclists: https://www.retsinformation.dk/image.aspx?id=196668&img=CX316_8_45.png Slippe

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hazards

2020-11-27 Thread Andy Townsend
On 27/11/2020 04:25, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote: Assuming that the boundary of that area is reasonably permanent, my first reaction is that this could be described by military=danger_area.  However, that tag requires landuse=military as the primary tag, which probably isn't correct here. On

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hazards (mine shaft)

2020-11-27 Thread ael via Tagging
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 04:01:09PM -0500, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 3:41 PM ael via Tagging > wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 09:11:25AM -0500, Brian M. Sperlongano wrote: > > > I am not opposed to including unsigned hazards > > > > There are a surprising number o

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hazards

2020-11-27 Thread Brian M. Sperlongano
Niels, thanks for the list. I was able to find examples and existing tagging for most of the values you noted as missing, and I've updated the proposal to add them. I did already have a value listed dangerous intersection (hazard=dangerous_junction, 400 usages). The one you listed that is not cl

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hazards

2020-11-27 Thread Brian M. Sperlongano
It looks like you're referring to this area: https://www.openstreetmap.org/query?lat=40.3482&lon=46.5377#map=10/40.3812/46.8347 It seems that this giant border-area polygon was removed recently as it's only rendered at lower zoom levels. If the precedent is that military conflict areas are mapped

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hazards (mine shaft)

2020-11-27 Thread Brian M. Sperlongano
It seems to me that there is a clear case for there being both hazardous and non-hazardous examples of man_made=mineshaft. The question is how to tag the ones that are hazardous. I think the right answer is simply man_made=mineshaft + hazard=yes. If we were to approve hazard=open_mineshaft, you

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hazards

2020-11-27 Thread Peter Neale via Tagging
>Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2020 12:08:25 -0500 >From: "Brian M. Sperlongano" >To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" >    >Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Hazards >Message-ID:     >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >Niels, thanks for the list. >I was able to find examp