3 is clearly out, 5 seems overly complex
Personally I would use 1.
8 Sep 2020, 20:09 by j...@mueschelsoft.de:
> Hi,
> in the comments of a changeset [1], there is a discussion about how to tag
> the required body height for users of an attraction in a theme park.
> Likewise, some playgrounds hav
I asked about this ~1½ years ago too (
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-February/thread.html#43244
). In the end I thought `sleepable:physical=yes/no` is an accurate tag, and
fits the OSM philosophy well (*
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2019-February/0
Hi there.
How should I tag an area dedicated to vacations, which is not a resort,
only for members of an institution? Those centres are very common near
the sea, and they range from kids camps (sons of government workers), to
bank or police pensioners/workers.
I was about to tag that as amenity=s
On Fri, 11 Sep 2020 at 09:40, António Madeira
wrote:
> Hi there.
>
> How should I tag an area dedicated to vacations, which is not a resort,
> only for members of an institution? Those centres are very common near
> the sea, and they range from kids camps (sons of government workers), to
> bank o
