Re: [Tagging] StreetComplete: no re-survey for speed limits

I am not sure what is the message of your statement. Is this just a general opinion regarding speed limits or is this somehow referring to the explanation I linked in the thread starter? If the latter, and you think after all it would be possible to implement such a re-survey for speed limits with

Re: [Tagging] StreetComplete: no re-survey for speed limits

Aug 20, 2020, 01:08 by o...@westnordost.de: > Hey guys, > > I just wanted to inform you that unfortunately, StreetComplete will not > offer a re-survey for speed limits in the upcoming "Map Maintenance with > StreetComplete" feature but probably never anyway. > > Short explanation: It is imposs

Re: [Tagging] We should stop using hyphens to denote address ranges

Aug 19, 2020, 10:46 by lon...@denofr.de: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:29:50PM +0200, Colin Smale wrote: > >> I think you misunderstand hyphenated addresses in Queens. The second >> part of the hyphenation is not a flat/apartment number. As an example, >> the Dunkin Donuts at the corner of 31st

Re: [Tagging] StreetComplete: no re-survey for speed limits

sent from a phone > On 20. Aug 2020, at 14:29, Tobias Zwick wrote: > > I am not sure what is the message of your statement. Is this just a > general opinion regarding speed limits or is this somehow referring to > the explanation I linked in the thread starter? I have commented on your point

Re: [Tagging] We should stop using hyphens to denote address ranges

sent from a phone > On 20. Aug 2020, at 15:29, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging > wrote: > > And it may be useful to have tag to mark "yes this is actually a single > housenumber despite > that includes hyphen or something else that suggests range" referring to addresses or to housenumbers,

Re: [Tagging] We should stop using hyphens to denote address ranges

> > > And it may be useful to have tag to mark "yes this is actually a single > housenumber despite > that includes hyphen or something else that suggests range" > I would assume that to be the default, when there are multiple addresses best to mark them all out individually or use a linear way wi

Re: [Tagging] We should stop using hyphens to denote address ranges

Aug 20, 2020, 15:50 by andrew.harv...@gmail.com: >>> >>> >> And it may be useful to have tag to mark "yes this is actually a single >> housenumber despite >> that includes hyphen or something else that suggests range"   >> > > I would assume that to be the default, when there are multiple addr

[Tagging] Canopy Walkways

I can’t find any references to canopy walkways in the wiki or on Taginfo. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canopy_walkway https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Canopy_walkways Current

Re: [Tagging] We should stop using hyphens to denote address ranges

then why not using addr:interpolation=no to state that the hyphen in addr:housenumber does not define a range ? I think everyone would be happy and it will not break current tagging schema. QA tools would raise a warning if there is an hyphen and no addr:interpolation tag. Default rule might be t

[Tagging] StreetComplete: summary of re-survey quests and how they will be tagged

Hi there, for your information, here is a summary of all re-survey enabled quests with intervals, element selection and notes what will be tagged now: https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/issues/1998#issuecomment-677825912 Cheers Tobias ___

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - kerb=regular

Voting is now open for the tag kerb=regular: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/kerb%3Dregular I intend to add the tag /kerb=regular/ to explicitly distinguish kerbs/curbs with "normal" standard height from /kerb=raised/ to solve a lack of clarity in the differentiation between

Re: [Tagging] Canopy Walkways

What's wrong with "bridge" ? Virus-free. www.avast.com <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - kerb=regular

Worth mentioning that the proposal intends to redefine the tag kerb=raised , true? Cheers Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Canopy Walkways

sent from a phone > On 20. Aug 2020, at 23:18, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > What's wrong with "bridge" ? it’s ok, but not sufficient when you want to search them. Maybe something like leisure=canopy_walkway or tourism=canopy_walkway (in addition)? Or maybe footway=canopy_walkway? highway= Foot

Re: [Tagging] Canopy Walkways

On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 07:50, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > Or maybe footway=canopy_walkway? highway= Footway and bridge=yes seem > essential for a basic description. > The combination of the three of them seems like a good, simple solution! Thanks Graeme _

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - kerb=regular

On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 2:33 PM Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > Worth mentioning that the proposal intends to redefine the tag kerb=raised > , true? > Martin - does that suggest that over 12,000 existing raised kerbs will need to be resurveyed? I've done hundreds of raised curbs in my county. While

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - kerb=regular

sent from a phone > On 21. Aug 2020, at 01:05, Clifford Snow wrote: > > Martin - does that suggest that over 12,000 existing raised kerbs will need > to be resurveyed? that’s how I read it, and there are actually 28.4K raised kerbs affected (because you have to look at the ways as well).

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - kerb=regular

>in the united states it is Curb. > >  >>Thursday, August 20, 2020 6:20 PM -05:00 from Martin Koppenhoefer < >>dieterdre...@gmail.com >: >>  >> >> >>sent from a phone >>  >>> On 21. Aug 2020, at 01:05, Clifford Snow < cliff...@snowandsnow.us > wrote: >>> >>> Martin - does that suggest that over 1

Re: [Tagging] Canopy Walkways

The footway= approach isn't so good. A canopy walkway is more a bridge type. On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, 00:28 Graeme Fitzpatrick, wrote: > > > > On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 07:50, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > >> >> Or maybe footway=canopy_walkway? highway= Footway and bridge=yes seem >> essential for a