On 8/8/20 10:54 am, Andy Townsend wrote:
Hello,
This is a question that actually arose out of a "how to tag" argument
that's come to the attention of the DWG in the USA, but it's actually
easy to describe in terms of data in the UK that I'm familiar with, so
I'll do that.
https://www.openst
Here in Stockholm, trains seem to line up one end of the train with one
end of the platform. Usually, that's the end where the entrance is, but
sometimes there are entrances at both ends, so if you arrive just in
time at an unfamiliar station and find that it's a short train, you may
be in for
The truth is that both shop and
amenity fit and both well have some
people unhappy
7 Aug 2020, 20:59 by tagging@openstreetmap.org:
> Hello
>
> Sorry for pause the bubble tea proposal for a month due to my personal reason.
>
> In the discussion in June and July some people think the tag for bubble
On 8/8/20 8:29 am, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I still believe shop=bubble_tea is suitable, as these are specific shops where
you can get only bubble tea. Although bubble tea is something to drink, I would
rather think of it as a specific kind of sweets, than as a shop where you can
get a bever
On 10/8/20 7:06 pm, Ture Pålsson via Tagging wrote:
Here in Stockholm, trains seem to line up one end of the train with
one end of the platform. Usually, that's the end where the entrance
is, but sometimes there are entrances at both ends, so if you arrive
just in time at an unfamiliar station
On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 10:09, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
The truth is that both shop and
> amenity fit and both well
>
Not exactly. Shop fits where consumption is not allowed on the premises.
Amenity fits where consumption is allowed on the premises. Ameni
sent from a phone
> On 10. Aug 2020, at 14:11, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Not exactly. Shop fits where consumption is not allowed on the premises.
while it could be an indication, there isn’t such a strong rule that you could
tell from seeing a shop=* tag that consumption is never allowed at al
On 08/08/2020 19.12, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Sun, 9 Aug 2020 at 03:39, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
We already have capacity and capacity=disabled, what's the problem with
adding more capacity:*?
But what number do we show for "capacity"?
IIUC, all of them. So...
I started wondering about t
On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 13:50, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> > On 10. Aug 2020, at 14:11, Paul Allen wrote:
> >
> > Not exactly. Shop fits where consumption is not allowed on the premises.
>
> while it could be an indication, there isn’t such a strong rule that you
> could tell from seeing a sh
On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 09:09, Paul Allen wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 13:50, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> > On 10. Aug 2020, at 14:11, Paul Allen wrote:
>> > Not exactly. Shop fits where consumption is not allowed on the premises.
>>
>> while it could be an indication, there isn’t such a
Is there further discussion on this, or do the advocates thing it’s ready for a
vote?
> On Jun 26, 2020, at 11:19, Walker Bradley wrote:
>
>
> I fully support it as outlined by Joseph.
>
>>> On Jun 26, 2020, at 12:59, Joseph Eisenberg
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>
>> > Regarding man_made=qanat vers
On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 15:36, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 09:09, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> > We're into cultural edge cases here.
>
> Not surprising since your "shop fits where consumption is not allowed
> on the premises" is a very your-culture-centric view on things.
>
You
sent from a phone
> On 10. Aug 2020, at 15:11, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> If you disagree with that, then whichever of shop
> or amenity you think is the best fit to your cultural edge case and should
> therefore apply to all types of establishment in all countries, I want the
> other
> one. If y
one of the points that i talked about, that no one has answered yet is what
about someone not local
who just puts 400 + unverified stops on platforms and there all wrong.
>Monday, August 10, 2020 4:30 AM -05:00 from Warin < 61sundow...@gmail.com >:
>
>On 10/8/20 7:06 pm, Ture Pålsson via Tag
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 4:27 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> one of the points that i talked about, that no one has answered yet is
> what about someone not local
>
> who just puts 400 + unverified stops on platforms and there all wrong.
>
Again, is there a re
On 11/8/20 9:25 am, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging wrote:
one of the points that i talked about, that no one has answered yet is
what about someone not local
who just puts 400 + unverified stops on platforms and there all wrong.
If you find something wrong - correct it.
If the things mapped are
the train or trains do not stop where he says they do, and i am talking about
400 +,
unverified platforms. which is 200 + stations,
see; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metra
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2020-August/054669.html
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagg
On 11/8/20 1:11 pm, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging wrote:
the train or trains do not stop where he says they do,
Do they stop at the platform? Yes.
So stop positions maybe mapped.
and i am talking about 400 +,
unverified platforms. which is 200 + stations,
Unverified? Verified by the existing sig
18 matches
Mail list logo
