Also, seriously, no offense to Croatia, the only place in the world not
hostile to Americans that US passports are still accepted. We don't
deserve that gesture, but I appreciate the self-sacrificing move if only to
not make us follow entirely in North Korea's footsteps.
On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 1:
> On Aug 1, 2020, at 7:45 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> Slightly OT question here, please.
>
> I remember reading a US press article ~12 months ago (may have even been
> mentioned on here in discussions at the time re = aboriginal_land?) to the
> effect that the US Supreme Court was shor
sent from a phone
> On 2. Aug 2020, at 03:55, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Much easier to tag the numerical height of the curb as this avoids the
> confusion of words, particularly with different languages, cultures and
> climates.
this would require a lot of measurements, while
sent from a phone
> On 2. Aug 2020, at 09:01, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> Also, seriously, no offense to Croatia, the only place in the world not
> hostile to Americans that US passports are still accepted.
I don’t see it as hostility, it’s reasonable precautions, of temporary nature...
Cheer
service=parking seems like a good idea
to me
2 Aug 2020, 02:40 by dd...@ieee.org:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm interested in proposing and/or documenting existing tagging approaches of
> the wiki to ensure that all highway=service ways can have a service=?
> associated tag. Having done, so I'm planni
Jan,
I see you have done much work on this topic on your page
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Mueschel/DestinationTagging); why
didn't you include these informations on the general Wiki pages instead of your
user pages?
Regards.
--
Nouvelle adresse mail : penegal...@protonmail.com
S
sent from a phone
> On 2. Aug 2020, at 10:19, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
> wrote:
>
> service=parking seems like a good idea
> to me
too generic for me, also not suitable where the road is not just for the
parking.
Proposal: service=access_collector
Cheers Martin
_
On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 at 18:55, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> Proposal: service=access_collector
>
Sorry, means nothing, at least to me?
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
sent from a phone
> On 2. Aug 2020, at 11:28, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> Sorry, means nothing, at least to me?
it’s meant to be a coined word for an access road that leads to more access
roads, that collects different or multiple kind of access roads, in short a
more important access ro
It started as my personal summary of tags, but in the meantime it looks
like it got a rather comprehensive summary of current tagging practice.
I don't really know where to start cleaning up the Wiki, because this
also means to remove some of the existing pages and replace them.
I'm happy if
On Sunday 02 August 2020, Paul Norman via Tagging wrote:
>
> I would consider an area mapped as water both with natural=coastline
> and waterway=riverbank or natural=water in error. I haven't seen any
> cases where this is done.
It is long term established practice at the Elbe and Weser in Germany
sent from a phone
> On 2. Aug 2020, at 12:30, Christoph Hormann wrote:
>
> If you consider that incorrect you also have to ask yourself if you draw
> the same conclusion for natural=bay and natural=strait polygons:
didn’t you argue some time ago that natural=bay should only be placed as nod
On Sun, Aug 02, 2020 at 01:04:15AM -0400, Jmapb wrote:
> On 8/1/2020 8:40 PM, David Dean wrote:
> > I'm interested in proposing and/or documenting existing tagging
> > approaches of the wiki to ensure that all highway=service ways can
> > have a service=? associated tag.
>
> Hi David -- My feeling
On Sunday 02 August 2020, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> >
> > If you consider that incorrect you also have to ask yourself if you
> > draw the same conclusion for natural=bay and natural=strait
> > polygons:
>
> didn’t you argue some time ago that natural=bay should only be placed
> as nodes because
On Sat, 1 Aug 2020 at 20:21, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> > On 1. Aug 2020, at 17:20, Alan Mackie wrote:
> >
> > I don't know how I'd map this. Do you have to pass through border
> checkpoints when you enter or leave the area?
>
>
> around here, no, but neither are there border checkpoints at
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 6:42 PM Paul Norman via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> Starting locally, the Fraser River has a strong tidal influence 25km
> upstream of the coastline/riverbank edge. Fishers report a tidal
> influence 90km upstream. Wikipedia says the Columbia has tidal infl
On Sun, 2 Aug 2020 at 07:56, Alan Mackie wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Aug 2020 at 20:21, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> > On 1. Aug 2020, at 17:20, Alan Mackie wrote:
>> > I don't know how I'd map this. Do you have to pass through border
>> > checkpoints when you enter or leave the area?
>>
>> around h
Hi Garry,
On 2020-06-13 18:49, Garry Keenor wrote:
> Also, there are only 2 networks that I can identify worldwide that are 4th
> rail, and I've tagged them both already. :-)
You may have missed one I just discovered that the LIM lines of
SkyTrain (Vancouver) have some kind of 4-rail syste
> - Roads through cemeteries
> - Roads through campgrounds
> - Roads through schools
> - Roads through universities
> - Roads through hotels
> - Roads through museums
> - Roads through prisons
> - Roads through military areas
> - Roads through airports
> - Roads through retirement homes
>
On Mon, 3 Aug 2020 at 05:49, Tobias Zwick wrote:
>
> So what all these have in common is that they are not public roads not
> intended for through-traffic. They are all on private/public properties.
> So maybe they could be summarized under service=property, with a
> description like "roads on (p
sent from a phone
> On 3. Aug 2020, at 00:18, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
>>
>> So what all these have in common is that they are not public roads not
>> intended for through-traffic. They are all on private/public properties.
>> So maybe they could be summarized under service=property, with
On 2/8/20 5:41 pm, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 2. Aug 2020, at 03:55, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
Much easier to tag the numerical height of the curb as this avoids the
confusion of words, particularly with different languages, cultures and
climates.
this woul
sent from a phone
> On 3. Aug 2020, at 02:15, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The point is that a 'normally expected curb' may be a considerable obstacle
> to a wheelchair person. And the purpose of this tagging is to indicate
> wheelchair access difficulties.
wheelchair users are
Thanks for the great feedback, everyone.
Firstly, I don't want anyone to feel that just tagging highway=service is
wrong, and you have to have a service tag. Any information available on the
map is more useful than no information. I just want the ability to
differentiate between 'we don't know wha
24 matches
Mail list logo
