On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 04:08, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
> To sidestep your question, oneway=yes on a highway=footway, cycleway or
> path already implies it's not accessible to vehicles so a oneway tag on any
> of those highway tags should apply to all modes of transport. So
> highway=footway + oneway=
Hello,
I created the preset as we needed something to map offices of
* Christelijke Mutualiteit (CM) https://www.cm.be/ - on Wikipedia:
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landsbond_der_Christelijke_Mutualiteiten
* Socialistische Mutualiteit https://www.socmut.be/
* Liberale Mutualiteit https://www.lm.
sent from a phone
> On 16. Apr 2020, at 05:04, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> Some paths and footways have oneway=yes. Sometimes this means that
> bicycles may only access these features in one direction, but other
> times it has been used for one-way features for pedestrians (for
> example, q
sent from a phone
> On 16. Apr 2020, at 05:44, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
>
> foot:backward=no may make sense
> to someone who has already read the wiki or other documentation, but is
> confusing and has the double negative aspect to it.
there is no double negative to it, it is a simple transport
On 16/4/20 7:59 pm, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 16. Apr 2020, at 05:04, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
Some paths and footways have oneway=yes. Sometimes this means that
bicycles may only access these features in one direction, but other
times it has been used for one-way featur
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 11:48, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What reason is there for excluding other modes of transport?
>
>
Many ways permit more than one mode of transport. Does oneway apply
to all modes? Does that mean I can only walk in the same direction that
traffic is permitted
But on a highway=footway,cycleway,path you can't drive a vehicle, so in
those cases if there is a oneway=yes it's fair to assume it applies to all
modes of transport on that way, unless otherwise indicated. Sure you can
add oneway:foot=yes if you like, but oneway=yes should be interpreted as
the sa
Bicycle is a vehicle (in OSM transportation mode hierarchy at least)
An other way to explain Martin point is by saying that oneway key is an
alias of vehicle:backward|forward
oneway=yes -> vehicle:backward=no
oneway=-1 -> vehicle:forward=no
oneway=yes -> vehicle:backward=no
oneway:bicycle=no -> b
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 12:50, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
> But on a highway=footway,cycleway,path you can't drive a vehicle, so in
> those cases if there is a oneway=yes it's fair to assume it applies to all
> modes of transport on that way, unless otherwise indicated. Sure you can
> add oneway:foot=ye
sent from a phone
> On 16. Apr 2020, at 11:41, Marc Gemis wrote:
>
> It's a health fund, and every adult Belgian needs to have one
judging by their names, are they all mutual insurance companies?
Cheers Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@
Yes I agree to your proposes.
So I conclude that an under-tag for highway=traffic_signals to mark that the lights are controlling a crossing only is not really needed?
Or maybe could it just be an addition to highway=traffic_signals, no matter whether the highway=traffic_signals-osm-node appea
Am Do., 16. Apr. 2020 um 12:48 Uhr schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
> On 16/4/20 7:59 pm, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
> sent from a phone
>
>
> On 16. Apr 2020, at 05:04, Joseph Eisenberg
> wrote:
>
> Some paths and footways have oneway=yes. Sometimes this means that
> bicycles may only
Am Do., 16. Apr. 2020 um 13:50 Uhr schrieb Andrew Harvey <
andrew.harv...@gmail.com>:
> But on a highway=footway,cycleway,path you can't drive a vehicle, so in
> those cases if there is a oneway=yes it's fair to assume it applies to all
> modes of transport on that way, unless otherwise indicated.
On 4/16/2020 4:46 AM, Paul Allen wrote:
On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 04:08, Andrew Harvey mailto:andrew.harv...@gmail.com>> wrote:
To sidestep your question, oneway=yes on a highway=footway,
cycleway or path already implies it's not accessible to vehicles
so a oneway tag on any of those hi
Hello,
According to Martin and Warin, the difference between large and small refugee site is not clear enough,
Martin suggested to use population capacity, for instance less than 200 people fro small refugee site,
Warin suggested to use number of square meters,
sent from a phone
> On 13. Apr 2020, at 01:11, François Lacombe wrote:
>
> It is still proposed to discourage pump=powered/manual as they're at least
> redundant with proposed classification of pumps/drivers technologies.
aren’t manual pumps powered as well? (human powered?)
Manual means b
The previous proposal of Hiking trail role values appears to be stuck. The
initiator has let me know that help would be appreciated. I then prepared a
much simpler concept proposal which IMO could pass, and asked his opinion.
So far he has not responded, but a helpful soul has moved my concept to
"
Maybe I missed something on this long thread but I don't understand why
we need to divide large refugee site from small refugee site. Why create
ambiguities if all of them are refugee sites?
Do we divide big schools from small schools? Or small theatres from big
theatres?
Why don't we just create
Hi all,
As explained here
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Pumping_proposal#Consider_drivers_as_pump_specific_devices
motion_driver=* is the best term I found to make a distinction with actual
(human) drivers and prevent to use "pump" word as it have to be suitable
for f
On 15/04/2020 23:03, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
Some paths and footways have oneway=yes. Sometimes this means that
bicycles may only access these features in one direction, but other
times it has been used for one-way features for pedestrians (for
example, queues in theme parks or at border control
After communicating with lutz from Historic.Place, he told me they
didn't create this heritage scheme, they just adopted it.
I took the opportunity to present him my proposal of refining this
scheme and I got his support to go ahead with it, so I'm presenting it
here in order to make the necessary
21 matches
Mail list logo
