Re: [Tagging] Is there a good way to indicate "pushing bicycle not allowed here"?

5 Nov 2019, 18:47 by selfishseaho...@gmail.com: > On Tue, 5 Nov 2019 at 18:25, Volker Schmidt wrote: > >> >> This a well-known (small) problem that from time to time turns up in OSM >> discussions. And then the discussion fizzles out again. >> > > Which is also a well-known problem ... > > I

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - sunbathing

The voting reached the planned end date. There are 18 votes in total submitted there plus 2 non-voting comments. The results are: 13 "yes" including my own vote and 5 "no" including one without a comment, which gives 72% of "yes" votes. It's marginally lower than 74%, but the response is appare

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - sunbathing

Am Mi., 6. Nov. 2019 um 10:19 Uhr schrieb Vɑdɪm : > The voting reached the planned end date. > > There are 18 votes in total submitted there plus 2 non-voting comments. > > The results are: 13 "yes" including my own vote and 5 "no" including one > without a comment, which gives 72% of "yes" votes.

Re: [Tagging] Is there a good way to indicate "pushing bicycle not allowed here"?

Am Mi., 6. Nov. 2019 um 09:16 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny < matkoni...@tutanota.com>: > Also, it may be OK to carry bicycle in a box and not OK > to push (not road access, but in some train you are not allowed to > enter with bicycle, > bit once bicycle is in a box this is considered as entirely

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - sunbathing

On 06/11/19 20:47, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Am Mi., 6. Nov. 2019 um 10:19 Uhr schrieb Vɑdɪm >: The voting reached the planned end date. There are 18 votes in total submitted there plus 2 non-voting comments. The results are: 13 "yes" including m

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (phone)

Given the comments, wouldn't it make sense to reopen at the opposite, i.e legitimating contact:phone over phone? The idea of having only one instead of two tags was apparently quite approved in itself. De : Martin Koppenhoefer Envoyé : mardi 5 novembre 2019 22:2

Re: [Tagging] Is there a good way to indicate "pushing bicycle not allowed here"?

Yes, indeed, and not only for motorcycle. also moped and mofa. There is law that says, pushing the mofa, moped, motorcycle, you must follow the rules of a pedestrian. It also says, where the pedestrian should walk, first on a footway, if that is not there, on cycleway, if that is not there, the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (phone)

Will come, will come, please be patient. This is on ny ToDo list.~ Sören Reinecke alias Valor Naram Original Message Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (phone)From: MARLIN LUKE To: Martin Koppenhoefer ,"Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" CC: Given th

Re: [Tagging] Is there a good way to indicate "pushing bicycle not allowed here"?

Am Mi., 6. Nov. 2019 um 12:47 Uhr schrieb Allroads : > Not only for bicycle dismount is used. These mofa moped motorcycle, need > also wiki pages. > > IMHO we need neither bicycle=dismount, nor similar tags for mofas, mopeds, motorcycles and other vehicles. If you dismount, you are a pedestrian (

Re: [Tagging] Is there a good way to indicate "pushing bicycle not allowed here"?

Their are Government rules and landowner rules. These landowner rules are mostly expressed on the border of their land with a access_sign > access_sign rules >“typically not traffic rules but additional” equally important In the rural, their lots of these access_signs. Mostly wr

Re: [Tagging] Service road - Can it be a driveway if serving multiple houses?

Dave F via Tagging writes: > In the UK, Amazon Logistics are adding useful data from their GPS'd > delivery vehicles. Mainly highway=service as the last part of their > journey to a destination. > > However, one of their contributors removed service=driveway from a > highway=service road. In the

Re: [Tagging] Is there a good way to indicate "pushing bicycle not allowed here"?

On Wed, 6 Nov 2019 15:17:55 +0100 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > Am Mi., 6. Nov. 2019 um 12:47 Uhr schrieb Allroads > >: > > > Not only for bicycle dismount is used. These mofa moped motorcycle, > > need also wiki pages. > > IMHO we need neither bicycle=dismount, nor similar tags for mofas, >

Re: [Tagging] Is there a good way to indicate "pushing bicycle not allowed here"?

Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > IMHO we need neither bicycle=dismount, nor similar tags for mofas, > mopeds, motorcycles and other vehicles. If you dismount, you are > a pedestrian (according to many jurisdictions) But not according to all justifications, as I have explained wrt the UK. > As this

Re: [Tagging] Is there a good way to indicate "pushing bicycle not allowed here"?

On 06/11/19 21:21, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Am Mi., 6. Nov. 2019 um 09:16 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny mailto:matkoni...@tutanota.com>>: Also, it may be OK to carry bicycle in a box and not OK to push (not road access, but in some train you are not allowed to enter with bicycle,

Re: [Tagging] Is there a good way to indicate "pushing bicycle not allowed here"?

Just to add another aspect: There is a full-hight turnstile in Christchurch College Park in Oxford where bicycles and pushchairs do physically not pass. But seriously let's decide on a taking for a hard bicycle=no. As far as dog=yes|no is concerned I am sure this tag is used by dog owners to tag r

Re: [Tagging] Is there a good way to indicate "pushing bicycle not allowed here"?

On 06/11/2019 23:13, Volker Schmidt wrote: Just to add another aspect: There is a full-hight turnstile in Christchurch College Park in Oxford where bicycles and pushchairs do physically not pass. There is no such place as Christchurch College Park in Oxford. -- Steve -- This email has been

Re: [Tagging] tagging extremely large flood control features.

the government released photos of the water control features I’ve mentioned being filled by the recent typhoon. The “flooding” pictured is by design, controlled by short inner and large, tall outer levees. This should give people a better idea of the scale of the water features I am talking ab

Re: [Tagging] tagging extremely large flood control features.

On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 09:50, John Willis via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: That's amazing, thanks, John ~The recent typhoon that completely filled the basins & rivers to become > one giant lake (as designed) controlled by the outer levees: > > http://www.ktr.mlit.go.jp/ktr_content/c