On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 23:02, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> +1, or e.g. sidewalk:right=lane
> there are a few instances tagged like this:
> https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/sidewalk%3Aright=lane
18 out of 30 are additionally tagged sidewalk=right. I think it's
better to keep "sidewalk" ou
Am 20.10.2019 um 11:24 schrieb Markus:
On Sat, 19 Oct 2019 at 23:02, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
+1, or e.g. sidewalk:right=lane
there are a few instances tagged like this:
https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/sidewalk%3Aright=lane
18 out of 30 are additionally tagged sidewalk=right. I think
I have seen this kind of sidewalk that is just a marked lane in Germany as
well, usually as part of parking lots or larger company grounds.
How about:
sidewalk=right
sidewalk:right:kerb=no
sidewalk:right:surface=asphalt
The most important thing is to tag whether there is a sidewalk or not.
Re
I think you guys forgot one thing: the OSM is not specifically about UK,
Australia or any other country. It's a global map.
In your region you may perhaps you may not have any dedicated areas for
sunbathing, so -- don't use the tag. On the other hand I could imagine there
are some countries you co
Landcover classification systems do not match directly with current
OpenStreetMap data and tagging. Our tagging system developed
organically, based on what people would call map features in ordinary
British English, so we have tags like natural=wood, rather than
natural=wetland, natural=heath, rath
On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 12:43, Vɑdɪm wrote:
> I think you guys forgot one thing: the OSM is not specifically about UK,
> Australia or any other country. It's a global map.
>
I didn't forget that. I'm pretty sure some of the others didn't forget
that either.
>
> In your region you may perhaps yo
We have a widely used scheme for tagging cycle lanes/paths on the road way:
cycleway=lane|track with variants.
Extrapolating from that for the pedestrian "lane" seems obvious to me:
sidewalk=lane (plus variants).
For separate sidewalks there is
sidewalk=yes (plus variants)
Why invent something dif
On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 12:42, Tobias Zwick wrote:
>
> How about:
>
> sidewalk=right
> sidewalk:right:kerb=no
I dislike using these tags for pedestrian lanes for the following
reasons (sorry if i repeat myself):
* It doesn't make sense: if it doesn't have a kerb (or any other
physical barrier)
On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 12:24, Georg Feddern wrote:
>
> Why not in analogy to cycleway=track|lane|...
> sidewalk=track|lane|...
This would require a huge amount of retagging. (There are currently
over 1.5 millions uses of sidewalk=*.)
On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 19:11, Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
> We ha
On 20.10.19 12:40, Tobias Zwick wrote:
I have seen this kind of sidewalk that is just a marked lane in Germany as
well, usually as part of parking lots or larger company grounds.
How about:
sidewalk=right
sidewalk:right:kerb=no
sidewalk:right:surface=asphalt
I also prefer this kind of taggin
Hey,
I finally opened the voting "Make `phone` Tag default for tagging
telephone numbers in OSM and deprecating contact:phone`. Please place
your voice at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Discussions/tagging/contact:phone_or_phone.
The Voting will be closed at 5th Novembre 2019. Please read t
On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 19:52, Jan Michel wrote:
>
> I also prefer this kind of tagging. I don't see a reason to invent a
> fully new tag for this - it is an area meant just for pedestrians just
> like a sidewalk. [...]
I don't know how it is elsewhere, but in Switzerland vehicles are
allowed to d
I'm not familiar with the laws of the country the picture [1] listed in the
first post on this thread, but the diagonal yellow lines look to me like a
don't park here rather than a sidewalk. Even the one pedestrian in the
picture isn't walking the diagonal yellow lines. Can someone confirm that
tho
On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 09:19:10 +0900
Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> How should areas of bare soil, such as badlands, be tagged?
>
> Currently there are documented tags for dry areas of bedrock, stones
> and sand:
>
> natural=bare_rock, natural=shingle, natural=scree, and natural=sand
>
> For tidal a
I think in bicycle-OSM we have kind of an tacitly agreed approach: bicycle
lanes (divided from motorised traffic by a painted line) are generally
mapped on the road way whereas separate parallel cycleways are tagged
either on the road way or as separate way, with the former often being the
first, f
I'm in favor of deprecating contact:phone now (and the other
contact:XXX duplicates later), but I don't know about your other
proposed changes.
For example, requiring the country code in all phone numbers would not
be standard practice in Indonesia or the USA, since people in these
countries very
On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 6:54 PM Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> For example, requiring the country code in all phone numbers would not
> be standard practice in Indonesia or the USA, since people in these
> countries very rarely make phone calls to other countries.
Including the country code in the US,
> On Oct 21, 2019, at 2:08 AM, Markus wrote:
>
> * It doesn't make sense: if it doesn't have a kerb (or any other
> physical barrier) it isn't a sidewalk.
This is the most important information.
it should be tagged as a “footway lane” or “pedestrian lane” or similar.
Javbw
a "sidewalk l
On 21/10/19 09:52, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
I'm in favor of deprecating contact:phone now (and the other
contact:XXX duplicates later), but I don't know about your other
proposed changes.
For example, requiring the country code in all phone numbers would not
be standard practice in Indonesia or t
On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 00:58, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21/10/19 09:52, Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
> >
> > For example, requiring the country code in all phone numbers would not
> > be standard practice in Indonesia or the USA, since people in these
> > countries very rarely make phon
> Whatever else may have been changed in this proposal, the number format
wasn't one of those changes
Sorry, I didn't realize this. I was reading the proposal and assumed
that the "Content" section was supposed to be different.
Valor Naram, could you clarify what specific changes will be made to
That sounds right. So natural=badlands could be used on a node, or on
an area covering the heavily-eroded, bare soil area of the landform?
On 10/21/19, Mark Wagner wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 09:19:10 +0900
> Joseph Eisenberg wrote:
>
>> How should areas of bare soil, such as badlands, be tagge
Am 20.10.2019 um 23:23 schrieb Clifford Snow:
I'm not familiar with the laws of the country the picture [1] listed
in the first post on this thread, but the diagonal yellow lines look
to me like a don't park here rather than a sidewalk. Even the one
pedestrian in the picture isn't walking the d
+1 to this tagging scheme.
I strongly prefer new tags for additional
detail over new incompatible ones.
20 Oct 2019, 19:49 by j...@mueschelsoft.de:
> On 20.10.19 12:40, Tobias Zwick wrote:
>
>> I have seen this kind of sidewalk that is just a marked lane in Germany as
>> well, usually as part of
20 Oct 2019, 19:08 by selfishseaho...@gmail.com:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 12:42, Tobias Zwick wrote:
>
>>
>> How about:
>>
>> sidewalk=right
>> sidewalk:right:kerb=no
>>
>
> I dislike using these tags for pedestrian lanes for the following
> reasons (sorry if i repeat myself):
>
> * It doesn't m
25 matches
Mail list logo
