Re: [Tagging] capacity=* of bicycle sharing stations when no. of bikes > no. of stands

Mar 31, 2019, 3:51 AM by www.ha...@gmail.com: > Hi all, > > A new bicycle-sharing scheme called MEVO has just (sort of) started in Poland. > It consists of 660 stations, which function like regular bicycle stands (no > active parts). > > The bikes are station-less, which means they can be left

Re: [Tagging] capacity=* of bicycle sharing stations when no. of bikes > no. of stands

Mar 31, 2019, 4:20 AM by 61sundow...@gmail.com: > On 31/03/19 12:51, Michał Brzozowski wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> A new bicycle-sharing scheme called MEVO has just (sort of) started in >> Poland. >> It consists of 660 stations, which function like regular bicycle stands (no >> active parts). >

Re: [Tagging] airport check in counters

The check in counters are generally quite numerous, so you’d need a detailed indoor map which I’m yet to see for an airport in osm. The wiki aeroways page mentions the undocumented amenity=check_in and security control. For arrival lounges, I think there were a number of “waiting area” proposal

Re: [Tagging] Horse mounting steps compared to horse walker

Am 31.03.2019 04:30, schrieb Warin: On 27/03/19 20:23, Hufkratzer wrote: On 27.03.2019 07:37, Warin wrote: [...] I'd still call it a 'mounting block' ... no steps in the name so it can be a ramp or, in your case, a platform. Add wheelchair=yes and a description=* tag ??? +1, in wikipedia it

Re: [Tagging] Values in namespaces/prefixes/suffixes Considered Harmful - Or: Stop over-namespacing and prefix-fooling

Hi, 24. März 2019 12:05 bkil wrote: > What about these (also added to the wiki talk page)? Thanks for compiling this list of (over-)namespaced tags currently which contain mainly yes and are mentioned in this wiki and/or currently in use in OSM. I renamed the wiki subtitle from "What about these?

Re: [Tagging] Values in namespaces/prefixes/suffixes Considered Harmful - Or: Stop over-namespacing and prefix-fooling

sent from a phone > On 31. Mar 2019, at 18:07, Stefan Keller wrote: > > This deteriorates the quality of OSM - and it hurts, given the fact, > that there is a proven alternative with semi-colon separated values, > which even allows tagging no-values (e.g. > service=no_retail,retail,repair,seco

Re: [Tagging] Values in namespaces/prefixes/suffixes Considered Harmful - Or: Stop over-namespacing and prefix-fooling

Hallo Martin Am So., 31. März 2019 um 22:01 Uhr schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer : > what about amenity=school;place_of_worship > is this desirable tagging? No, because amenity=school and amenity=place_of_worship are aka "top-level" keys (= main entities, main concepts) with one to several sub-keys.

Re: [Tagging] Values in namespaces/prefixes/suffixes Considered Harmful - Or: Stop over-namespacing and prefix-fooling

I strive to separate all entities by function to a reasonable extent. > what about amenity=school;place_of_worship > is this desirable tagging? > > What does it mean? A mix of a school and a place_of_worship or a place of > worship and a school? > Could you please give us more information on thi

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Runway Holding

> I'm planning on using the same format as the How to Map section of waterway=dock There is already an existing international aerodrome mapping standard and published schema which defines all features, their attributes, the hierarchical re

Re: [Tagging] airport check in counters

sent from a phone > On 31. Mar 2019, at 06:50, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There are also 'arrival lounges' where people can wait for family/friends > arriving. These are less of a problem, but still it would be good to have a > method of tagging them. > > Thoughts? there is a

Re: [Tagging] Values in namespaces/prefixes/suffixes Considered Harmful - Or: Stop over-namespacing and prefix-fooling

sent from a phone > On 31. Mar 2019, at 22:41, Stefan Keller wrote: > > No, because amenity=school and amenity=place_of_worship are aka > "top-level" keys (= main entities, main concepts) with one to several > sub-keys. this is also my interpretation, but this distinction is not always clear

Re: [Tagging] Values in namespaces/prefixes/suffixes Considered Harmful - Or: Stop over-namespacing and prefix-fooling

sent from a phone > On 31. Mar 2019, at 22:44, bkil wrote: > > I guess that you want to indicate a recycling container that also > includes a non-recycling communal waste compartment. None of these are tags I have ever used (in this combination), they are examples from taginfo. Like you I c

Re: [Tagging] airport check in counters

On 31/03/19 20:19, Anton Klim wrote: The check in counters are generally quite numerous, so you’d need a detailed indoor map which I’m yet to see for an airport in osm. A reason why they are not detailed is there are no tags for them, and then they do not render. I came across them in the Sy

Re: [Tagging] airport check in counters

On 01/04/19 09:20, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 31. Mar 2019, at 06:50, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: There are also 'arrival lounges' where people can wait for family/friends arriving. These are less of a problem, but still it woul

Re: [Tagging] Values in namespaces/prefixes/suffixes Considered Harmful - Or: Stop over-namespacing and prefix-fooling

On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 08:38, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 31. Mar 2019, at 22:44, bkil wrote: > > > > I guess that you want to indicate a recycling container that also > > includes a non-recycling communal waste compartment. > > > None of these are tags I have ever

Re: [Tagging] Horse mounting steps compared to horse walker

Ok .. I have a draft for mounting blocks https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/mounting_block Think I have the main points downs.. I'll leave it for a week and see. Then I'll do the RFC thing and see what happens.. Not certain about the voting method to determine the key.. if

[Tagging] historic=archaeological_site with site_type=rock_art, rock_painting definitions

Hi, I came across this https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Asite_type It posses a problem with rock_painting, rock_carving (petroglyph) and rock_art. rock_carving (petroglyph) is already well defined https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Asite_type%3Dpetroglyph Neither of the ot