[Tagging] tagging laboratories

Hi, From https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/62806/how-to-tag-a-research-laboratory and https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/thevikas/diary/47849 There appearsto be no information on how to tag a laboratory. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laboratory These can be commercialfirms, part of t

Re: [Tagging] tagging laboratories

Mar 4, 2019, 9:35 AM by 61sundow...@gmail.com: > Hi, > > From > > https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/62806/how-to-tag-a-research-laboratory > > > > and > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/thevikas/diary

Re: [Tagging] tagging laboratories

Am Mo., 4. März 2019 um 09:37 Uhr schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > > > These can be commercialfirms, part of the government, or part of a > university etc. > > They usually specialise in one field so will need sub tags. I would question whether we put all kind of "laboratory" into the

[Tagging] "satellit"

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/antenna%3Atype#values mentions "parabolic_satellit" "parabolic_satellit_uplink" and "parabolic_satellite_uplink". I have two remarks about that... First, evidently, "satellit" is wrong and should be "satellite"... Or have I missed something ? Unless someone e

Re: [Tagging] "satellit"

I would expect the "uplink" information to be relevant, as most satellite antennas are used for receiving only (those private tv reception antennas). Do not counter this with "not sufficiently relevant for mapping", as you'll see people will likely tag it ;-) Subtagging (or a property) seems bette

Re: [Tagging] "satellit"

On 2019-03-04 11:54, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > Do not counter this with "not sufficiently relevant for mapping", as you'll > see people will likely tag it ;-) Personally I counter this for lack of observability/verifiability. From https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Verifiability "At th

Re: [Tagging] Clarification unclassified vs residential

Hello Mateusz, You can not render correctly with a bad tagging, and that is the case here : in France, a trunk road have 2 lanes and oneway=yes by default, not in UK. I understand your criticism about the values I’ve used, it is not definitive :). Except maybe the values for road_level : they sh

Re: [Tagging] Mapping curb (kerb) lines as the home of curb, parking, etc information

It is the same story again and again. -First was the node and ways. And some classification . It was not enough -Second arrived relations. but when you want to specify more..it is not enough -Then it was other tags like classification, lanes, sidewalks... it is not enough if you want to make all

Re: [Tagging] Mapping curb (kerb) lines as the home of curb, parking, etc information

Putting aside the preexistence of barrier=kerb + kerb=* on lines, do you mean we should put kerb=* on a sidewalk line, a road line, or both? Keep in mind that every time the kerb type changes, this would imply splitting the way, so city street ways would be split another 2-8 times. And what about

Re: [Tagging] Mapping curb (kerb) lines as the home of curb, parking, etc information

More detail means more information and barrier=kerb on ways has existed for about a decade. I'm interested in hearing pros and cons of different strategies, if anyone is interested. On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:32 AM yo paseopor wrote: > It is the same story again and again. > > -First was the node

Re: [Tagging] Mapping curb (kerb) lines as the home of curb, parking, etc information

sent from a phone > On 4. Mar 2019, at 17:28, Nick Bolten wrote: > > Putting aside the preexistence of barrier=kerb + kerb=* on lines, do you mean > we should put kerb=* on a sidewalk line, a road line, or both? I would prefer a dedicated way for the kerb, and would not tag it on the road

Re: [Tagging] Mapping curb (kerb) lines as the home of curb, parking, etc information

On 03.03.19 20:12, Nick Bolten wrote: > I wanted to get a discussion started to see what people think of > mapping curbs as ways. Can we please first define a solution (e.g. a relation) for connecting such separately mapped components of a road to the highway? Painting lines next to each other fa

Re: [Tagging] "satellit"

On 04/03/19 21:54, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: I would expect the "uplink" information to be relevant, as most satellite antennas are used for receiving only (those private tv reception antennas). Do not counter this with "not sufficiently relevant for mapping", as you'll see people will likely

Re: [Tagging] Mapping curb (kerb) lines as the home of curb, parking, etc information

I'm also a fan of the dedicated line, my primary interest being pedestrian accessibility + QA-ability of such data. I keep thinking, "hey, I'll go map a curb line!" and run into a related issue: I can definitely map barrier=kerb and kerb=raised when one of those exists along a path - could be near

Re: [Tagging] Mapping curb (kerb) lines as the home of curb, parking, etc information

I recall seeing a lightning talk at the 2016 State of the Map US in Seattle about mapping curb lines. Lou Huang gave a talk "Representing streets in OSM with Curblines" [1] which proposed mapping streets from curb to curb as polygons if I recall correctly. (Unfortunately I couldn't find a video of

Re: [Tagging] Mapping curb (kerb) lines as the home of curb, parking, etc information

> Can we please first define a solution (e.g. a relation) for connecting such separately mapped components of a road to the highway? I agree, this is a very important issue and it happens for a lot of different situations - a lot of different features that can and are mapped separately would benef

Re: [Tagging] Mapping curb (kerb) lines as the home of curb, parking, etc information

For anyone interested in listening to Lou Huang's talk, I found it on Youtube. It starts at about 42:00 and ends at 48:00 [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOGsy9BFJ5Y On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 4:02 PM Nick Bolten wrote: > > Can we please first define a solution (e.g. a relation) for connecting

Re: [Tagging] New Tag "Departures" voting results.

Hello, I've gotten paid for wrangling GTFS worldwide before - happy to tell you some of my experiences. On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 at 19:42, Paul Allen wrote: > As I said, I'd prefer not to use url=* because it could be for anything - a > page about the history of > the bus stop (maybe the shelter is a

Re: [Tagging] tagging laboratories

On 04/03/19 21:25, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Am Mo., 4. März 2019 um 09:37 Uhr schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com >: These can be commercialfirms, part of the government, or part of a university etc. They usually specialise in one field so will

Re: [Tagging] tagging laboratories

In general at my university we usually talk about "wet labs" vs "dry labs", mostly in regards to hazardous materials. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wet_lab And for wet labs, there are different levels for biosafety... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosafety_level On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:

Re: [Tagging] tagging laboratories

... and then there are big research centres that are called "laboratory". Like LLNL or Los Alamos National Laboratory. On Tue, 5 Mar 2019, 06:08 Kevin, wrote: > In general at my university we usually talk about "wet labs" vs "dry > labs", mostly in regards to hazardous materials. > > https://en.