On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 6:30 PM Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 27. Jan 2019, at 12:29, Marc Gemis wrote:
> >
> > But often, the cycleway crossing the road is not mapped. How would you
> > map a bicycle only crossing if the parallel cycleway is mapped as
> > cycleway
sent from a phone
> On 28. Jan 2019, at 10:59, Marc Gemis wrote:
>
> representing a way in OSM, and foot=yes on the way (can be implicit),
> but foot=no on the X representing the bicycle crossing, pedestrians
> cannot pass point 'X'.
> At least that is how I understand the current access rules
On Sun, 27 Jan 2019 at 23:52, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
>
> "Both the cape & the peninsula can sometimes share the same name eg "Cape York
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2138519757#map=9/-10.6415/142.5873 is the
> extreme tip of Cape York Peninsula
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cape_York_
As a quick objection from a British mapper old enough to remember obsolete
measurements: long tons are pointless, too similar to toes and not used on
signs anywhere I know of, the abbreviation st can stand for a stone (6.3kg or
14lb).
--
Andrew
From: Warin <61su
Point. However where have you seen a weight limit in stone?
Possibly a lift? Though they usually just say number of people .. and
beep if over loaded.
The abbreviation form short ton has been there a while.
On 29/01/19 08:51, Andrew Hain wrote:
As a quick objection from a British mapper old
