On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 6:30 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > sent from a phone > > > On 27. Jan 2019, at 12:29, Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > But often, the cycleway crossing the road is not mapped. How would you > > map a bicycle only crossing if the parallel cycleway is mapped as > > cycleway=lane on the highway=x ? > > > foot=no on the highway=crossing node > Also if the cycleway is mapped explicitly it would make sense (if it were > forbidden for pedestrians to cross the street there), because it could still > mean there’s an implicit footway crossing otherwise.
foot=no means that pedestrians cannot pass that node for any way passing through the node, not ? so if you have ------------------X-------------------> representing a way in OSM, and foot=yes on the way (can be implicit), but foot=no on the X representing the bicycle crossing, pedestrians cannot pass point 'X'. At least that is how I understand the current access rules in OSM. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
