Re: [Tagging] Add some tag to identify disputed borders

Hi, You are right Andy, it depends a lot about the use case problem you are trying to fix. Let's say they are two use cases: The first one is about creating polygons from administrative boundaries relations, to make some geographical inclusions or reverse geocoding magic. I use Cosmogony

[Tagging] Tagging animal sanctuaries

According to Wikipedia, an animal sanctuary "is a facility where animals are brought to live and be protected for the rest of their lives. Unlike animal shelters, sanctuaries do not seek to place animals with individuals or groups, instead maintaining each animal until its natural death."[1] Cu

Re: [Tagging] Tagging animal sanctuaries

On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 18:35, Nicolas Maia wrote: > > So I propose to extend animal_shelter:purpose= to allow the value > "sanctuary", which ideally should be coupled with "animal_shelter:release=no". As you wrote, animal sanctuaries aren't animal shelters, so why not tagging them amenity=animal

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - landuse=governmental

Hello Thank you all for your feedback on this proposal so far. I'm wondering whether central banks should be included or excluded from landuse=governmental. Actually, a central bank isn't a part of the government, but is a governmental institution. However, it belongs to the core of the state and

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Tramtrack_on_highway)

Sorry that I enter the discussion late. First, is my understanding correct that you want to add a tag on a highway that has embedded tram rails? So e.g. a bicycle router might avoid such highways? Generally a good idea, I think. However to use railway=separately_mapped is not so good in my opin

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Tramtrack_on_highway)

Hmm, if someone want to do something with the railway key, they will look at the value. It's a good proposal. Yves Le 20 novembre 2018 22:02:01 GMT+01:00, Rainer a écrit : >Sorry that I enter the discussion late. >First, is my understanding correct that you want to add a tag on a >highway that

[Tagging] Suggestion: ref:mobile_payment for amenity=parking

Hi, this is my first message to the mailing list, so bear with me if this is not the correct way for suggesting something like this. I'd like to make a change to the Wiki but wanted to get your opinions first. Many (most?) public parking lots in Germany have the possibility to pay via SMS or

Re: [Tagging] Suggestion: ref:mobile_payment for amenity=parking

I am not 100% sure that mobile payment is the correct term, that to me implies using your phone for contactless payment. The English term used in these cases is Pay by Phone. Here payment can be made using coins, debit/credit cards (contactless or chip and pin) so I must admit I have ignored th

Re: [Tagging] Suggestion: ref:mobile_payment for amenity=parking

Le 20. 11. 18 à 22:51, Michael Brandtner a écrit : > this is my first message to the mailing list welcome > a specific number that has to be entered when paying with the mobile device it's a ref specific to this parking to be entered in an app ? or a https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payme

Re: [Tagging] Estimated values for height

> on the object it-self height=3 group all objet with this source, and put on the changeset : source=survey source:height=estimated or eyeball Yes, but this makes it far harder for a standard mapper to do QA - they now need to create the convoluted set of requests and filters I mentioned in the pr

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - landuse=governmental

sent from a phone > On 20. Nov 2018, at 21:05, SelfishSeahorse wrote: > > I'm wondering whether central banks should be included or excluded > from landuse=governmental. Actually, a central bank isn't a part of > the government, but is a governmental institution. However, it belongs > to the c

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - landuse=governmental

Correct: it very much depends and vary from state to state: Italy's central bank, Bank of Italy, is not a goverenmental institution (/it has shareholders.../), and the same is true (/afaik, but haven't checked/) for the US Federal Reserve Bank... On 2018-11-21 00:16, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Tramtrack_on_highway)

I like this very much! Maybe I'd love it even better if it would be: "surface:embedded rails=tram|railway" Cheers, Sergio On 2018-11-20 22:02, Rainer wrote: > ... > As the rails in the highway are a feature that describes the shape of the > highway similar to surface=*, I would rather use a