Re: [Tagging] amenity=festival_ground

2018-07-28 5:11 GMT+02:00 Mike H <1jg...@gmail.com>: > I came across the tag amenity=festival_grounds > and > it has quite a bit of variance in its use. I wrote a diary entry on it so I > have more details there. https://www.open

Re: [Tagging] default access tag for driveways

1) data is easier to understand for other mappers2) less fragile data, less likely to break in future edits3) maps that I use tend to show access on roads and not on barriers (it is notagainst "don't tag for renderer" advice as I am not adding incorrect data)4) I have never considered omitting a

Re: [Tagging] amenity=festival_ground

Martin, With the first case I meant places where a festival is held, but it's normally something else like the examples you gave. It also includes festivals that take place in just open fields. Most of the examples had information on the event and not any physical features, which is my biggest conc

Re: [Tagging] amenity=festival_ground

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Mike H <1jg...@gmail.com> wrote: > The third case was for places that are designated to host festivals such as > fairgrounds, showgrounds, etc... These sites will often be used for other > uses when they are not hosting festivals, but they are primarily built for >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - man_made=footwear_decontamination

Hi, Well it has been just over 2 weeks ... I have made some editorials - add 'for hikers' to the definition so as to exclude laboratory, door mats at residences etc, applies to areas and nodes, placing a link on the hiking page as a reference. If there are no further thoughts, comments then