Hi,
My own view of the building tag is that it notes what the building looks
like to someone on the ground. If it's a fairly generic building then
obviously the current use is a fairly good indicator. Something like a
church or pub though often still retains the characteristics of that type
of bui
> check_date tag is very imprecise. some use it to indicate when they checked
> the object on the ground without knowing what was checked.
> others use it to check the date of objects under construction in external
> sources without verification of the ground.
> I had proposed that we use operat
I removed all "useful combination" on hydrants wiki, because all optional tags
could be added to this list and it would become unnecessarily long.
Best regards
Alberto
---
Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
I think one mapping practice with contact:* could help .
1- addr:* tag space is for generic addresses, used by all consumers
2- if there is ambiguity between adresses (postal, physical, ...) then
use several namespaces
2a - addr:* tag space for physical address (used by geocoding, routing, ...)
2
2017-12-19 9:09 GMT+01:00 Adam Snape :
> Hi,
>
> My own view of the building tag is that it notes what the building looks
> like to someone on the ground. If it's a fairly generic building then
> obviously the current use is a fairly good indicator. Something like a
> church or pub though often st
Adam, Martin,
thanks for your input. It seems that one cannot only rely on what one
sees from the street, or at least not always. Sometimes the name
(church vs cathedral) has to be used to determine the value for
building.
I've seen pubs in all kind of buildings in Belgium, from being located
in t
Hi Viking,
Thank you for your work on this additional part
I'd be in favor of grouping pump et pump:type in on "pump" key.
Valid values would be yes, bilge_pump or electric_pum.
Yes would be used only if pump technology is unknown.
There is no need of 2 keys.
All the best
François
*François
Please don't use "pump:type" as it invites people to use it for loads of
different things. You are actually doing it yourself. A "bilge pump" is
functional and says nothing about the construction or power source (even
if there is such a thing as a typical bilge pump). And "electric_pump"
is about t
Hi Colin,
Am 2017-12-19 16:29, schrieb Colin Smale:
Please don't use "pump:type" as it invites people to use it for loads
of
different things. You are actually doing it yourself. A "bilge pump" is
functional and says nothing about the construction or power source
(even
if there is such a thin
Hi Moritz,
It depends on what characteristics are important to you.
"water driven" is power transfer medium so pump:power_medium=water. This
is not the energy source! It doesn't say if the water has
potential/kinetic energy due to gravity, or if it itself is being
pressurised by a powered pump
This will need a whole proposal to get a comprehensive description for
pumps.
I think we should only use pump=yes for now and wait for a more complete
document to be written.
I agree with Colin, this is a vast question and it takes time to think
about right tags to use.
François
*François Lacomb
Let me show to you, the smallest cathedral in the world:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_of_the_Holy_Cross,_Nin
It's not the seat of a bishop any more, but it was in the past (and
churches are often called cathedrals even after they lose the status of a
seat of a bishop).
I wouldn't tag thi
sent from a phone
> On 19. Dec 2017, at 22:00, Janko Mihelić wrote:
>
> I wouldn't tag this building=cathedral, even building=church is a bit much.
size is not everything, surely you have noticed this is from the nineth
century? If this building is considered a cathedral I would use the tag
13 matches
Mail list logo
